Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (184)
- UIC School of Law (77)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
-
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- BLR (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal research (13)
- Law (12)
- Technology (10)
- Algorithms (9)
- Black box (9)
-
- Empirical (8)
- Human/computer interaction (8)
- Language (8)
- Logic (8)
- Electronic legal research (7)
- Privacy (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Artificial intelligence (6)
- ESG (6)
- Law and computers (6)
- Securities and exchange commission (6)
- Computers (5)
- Copyright (5)
- Data (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Electronic search capabilities (5)
- Machine-readable data (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- AI (4)
- Addiction (4)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Antitrust (4)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (73)
- Publications (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (7)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (7)
-
- Articles (6)
- ExpressO (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Research Data (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Books (1)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Librarian Scholarship (1)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 312
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 643 (1999), George B. Trubow, Mark Herrick, Laura Mcfarland-Taylor
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 643 (1999), George B. Trubow, Mark Herrick, Laura Mcfarland-Taylor
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In this moot court competition bench memo, the Supreme Court the state of Marshall has to decide whether the monitoring and recording of a voice mail message in the work environment constitutes a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act ("ECPA") or an invasion of privacy. Plaintiff's brother is an employee of a for-profit corporation that provides a digital telephone system that allows employee use features such as voice mail. Employees can access their voice mail both at their desks or other location within the company. The company, however, implements a policy of random phone conversation monitoring to avoid abuse …
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 661 (1999), Donna Coury, Rebecca F. Kelley, Mark A. Miller
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 661 (1999), Donna Coury, Rebecca F. Kelley, Mark A. Miller
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 689 (1999), Jennifer Byram, Jacqueline Gray, Ian Wallach
1998 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 689 (1999), Jennifer Byram, Jacqueline Gray, Ian Wallach
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Electronic Commerce And Digital Signatures: An Annotated Bibliography, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1043 (1999), John R. Austin
The Law Of Electronic Commerce And Digital Signatures: An Annotated Bibliography, 17 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1043 (1999), John R. Austin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This bibliography is an annotated list of sources, including books, official documents, and web sites, that discuss the national and international issues surrounding electronic commerce and digital signatures. The sources are quite diverse and offer a wide range of research opportunities, which may save you untold research time by helping to narrow your search. For your convenience, the sources have been organized into several topic categories: Electronic Commerce (In general) Digital Signatures Certification Authorities Infrastructure Models and Authentication Techniques Uniform Commercial Code/ Statute of Frauds and Evidentiary Issues Encryption, Cryptography and Security Issues Foreign and International Aspects. Note that all …
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 181 (1999), George B. Trubow, Ann Liebschutz, Maria Pope
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 181 (1999), George B. Trubow, Ann Liebschutz, Maria Pope
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Every year The Center for Information Technology and Privacy Law of the John Marshall Law School hosts a moot court competition. This year's topic dealt with Internet hacking and subsequent harassment from personal information displayed on the web. The respondent, an Internet company that specializes in displaying pages from hacked websites, published a hacked page that contained personal information about the petitioner. The personal information included his social security number, home telephone number, and home address. Petitioner claimed invasion of privacy. The decision, from which the petitioner appeals, granted summary judgment in favor of the respondent. The issues presented in …
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 195 (1999), Harry Apostolakopoulos, Hunter M. Barrow, Kristi Belt
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 195 (1999), Harry Apostolakopoulos, Hunter M. Barrow, Kristi Belt
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Lawbrief For The Respondent, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 235 (1999), Alice Sum, Christine Lent, Kimberly Gilyard
1999 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Lawbrief For The Respondent, 18 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 235 (1999), Alice Sum, Christine Lent, Kimberly Gilyard
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Notaries Public: A Pathfinder, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1065 (1999), Glenn-Peter Ahlers Sr.
Notaries Public: A Pathfinder, 32 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1065 (1999), Glenn-Peter Ahlers Sr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Some Examples Of Using Legal Relations Language In The Legal Domain: Applied Deontic Logic, Layman E. Allen
Some Examples Of Using Legal Relations Language In The Legal Domain: Applied Deontic Logic, Layman E. Allen
Articles
The fundamental concept of the LEGAL RELATIONS Language (LRL) is the recursively-defined notion of LEGAL RELATION (LR). As LR is defined here, there is an infinite number of different LEGAL RELATIONS, and LRL is a language for precisely and completely describing each of those infinite number of dfferent LEGAL RELATIONS. With its robust collection of dfferent names, one for each of the different LEGAL RELATIONS, LRL provides adequate vocabulary for (1) describing every possible legal state of affairs, (2) accounting for every possible change from one legal state of affairs to another, (3) representing every possible legal rule, and (4) …
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 587 (1997), David E. Sorkin
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 587 (1997), David E. Sorkin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 609 (1997), Donna Blevins, Kathy Partain, Jay Ray
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 609 (1997), Donna Blevins, Kathy Partain, Jay Ray
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 645 (1997), Stacey Mckinley, Elizabeth Schmidt, Jeffrey Whitesell
1996 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 15 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 645 (1997), Stacey Mckinley, Elizabeth Schmidt, Jeffrey Whitesell
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 709 (1998), John Cartaina, Robert Dixon, Eric Rogers
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 709 (1998), John Cartaina, Robert Dixon, Eric Rogers
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 743 (1998), Michelle Regal Herrmann, Jennifer L. Johnson, Candace A. Ourso
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 743 (1998), Michelle Regal Herrmann, Jennifer L. Johnson, Candace A. Ourso
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 685 (1998), David E. Sorkin, Steven A. Mcauley, David B. Nash Iii
1997 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 16 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 685 (1998), David E. Sorkin, Steven A. Mcauley, David B. Nash Iii
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Many public libraries provide patrons with free public-access Internet terminals, largely for accessing information available on the World Wide Web. However, public concern exists over the ability of children who browse the Web without adult supervision to view sexually explicit materials and other inappropriate items. This concern has led to the development of various Internet filtering software programs. Some filtering programs operate by blocking access to documents containing certain words or phrases or combinations thereof. However, more common programs permit access only to documents or sites that appear in a pre-selected, "safe" database or that block access to documents that …
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 563 (1996), Gary L. Gassman
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
This is a Bench memorandum for the 1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition in Information Technology and Privacy Law. It is an interlocutory appeal from a circuit court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s defamation action. The facts include the defendant, Robert Jacobs, posting an allegedly defamatory comment aimed at the plaintiff, Jennifer Fetty on an online discussion board during a debate on abortion. Both reside in Illinois, but the comment was read and replied to by David Bornmann, a resident of the State of Marshall. The issues include whether defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction …
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 595 (1996), Aaron Reber, Todd Schrader, Rachelle Zidar
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 595 (1996), Aaron Reber, Todd Schrader, Rachelle Zidar
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 627 (1996), John Matney, Carmen Symes, Laura Underwood
1995 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 627 (1996), John Matney, Carmen Symes, Laura Underwood
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1994 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 505 (1995), Jeffrey Gold, Anne Gurnsey, Joseph Horzepa
1994 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 505 (1995), Jeffrey Gold, Anne Gurnsey, Joseph Horzepa
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1994 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 537 (1995), Candyce Beneke, Ursual Hall, Pam Rea
1994 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 13 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 537 (1995), Candyce Beneke, Ursual Hall, Pam Rea
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 627 (1994), Timothy R. Rabel
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 627 (1994), Timothy R. Rabel
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 645 (1994), Marie-Louise R. Samuels, Thomas W. Poultron, Scott W. Mcmickle
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 645 (1994), Marie-Louise R. Samuels, Thomas W. Poultron, Scott W. Mcmickle
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 679 (1994), Spiro P. Fotopoulos, Joseph E. Helweg, Alyce E. Hill
1993 John Marshall National Moot Court Competition In Information And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 12 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 679 (1994), Spiro P. Fotopoulos, Joseph E. Helweg, Alyce E. Hill
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Automatic Generation Of A Legal Expert System, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
Automatic Generation Of A Legal Expert System, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
Book Chapters
The use of the AUTOPROLOG system to generate automatically a legal expert system is described in this chapter. The interpretation of a statutory or other legal rule by one expert (or by the consensus of a group of experts) expressed in a normalized form is the only input needed by the AUTOPROLOG system (which includes Turbo Prolog, the AUTOPRO program, and some data files) to produce automatically a computer program that is an expert system for that legal rule. The process for producing a legal expert system for Section 213.1 of the Modal Penal Code, which deals with rape and …
Exploring Computer Aided Generation Of Questions For Normalizing Legal Rules, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
Exploring Computer Aided Generation Of Questions For Normalizing Legal Rules, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
Book Chapters
The process of normalizing a legal rule requires a drafter to indicate where the intent is to be precise and where it is to be imprecise in expressing both the between-sentence and within-sentence logical structure of that rule. Three different versions of a legal rule are constructed in the process of normalizing it: (1) the logical structure of the present version, (2) the detailed marker version, and (3) the logical structure of the normalized version. In order to construct the third version the analyst must formulate and answer specific questions about the terms that are used to express the logical …
One Use Of Computerized Instructional Gaming In Legal Education: To Better Understand The Rich Logical Structure Of Legal Rules And Improve Legal Writing, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
One Use Of Computerized Instructional Gaming In Legal Education: To Better Understand The Rich Logical Structure Of Legal Rules And Improve Legal Writing, Layman E. Allen, Charles S. Saxon
Articles
This article describes an innovation in legal education and speculates about its importance and effectiveness as an educational tool. The speculations about its potential use, however, are ones that each legal educator will be able to test individually to determine the effectiveness of this use of microcomputers to improve legal education. The computer software that permits the innovation to be used will be available to interested persons by the time that this article is published.
Ownership Of Access Information: Exploring The Application Of Copyright Law To Library Catalog Records, 4 Computer L.J. 305 (1983), Celia Delano Moore
Ownership Of Access Information: Exploring The Application Of Copyright Law To Library Catalog Records, 4 Computer L.J. 305 (1983), Celia Delano Moore
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Need For Clear Structure In 'Plain Language' Legal Drafting, Layman E. Allen, C. Rudy Engholm
The Need For Clear Structure In 'Plain Language' Legal Drafting, Layman E. Allen, C. Rudy Engholm
Articles
Language is not simple. To pretend otherwise is to mislead. In practice the aspect that is handled most ineptly in written legal materials is the structure. The focus of this article is upon structure and how to improve it. At the outset, let one thing be absolutely clear. In seeking to achieve clarity of expression, those who have no more to recommend than short sentences, simple words, and readability formulas are offering a cracker in circumstances where a full gourmet feast is gleaming in the chef's eye for those with the wit but to ask for the menu. To practice …
Implementation And Cost Effectiveness Of Computerized Legal Research - Lexis And Westlaw Compared, 1 Computer L.J. 359 (1978), Richard M. Mcgonigal
Implementation And Cost Effectiveness Of Computerized Legal Research - Lexis And Westlaw Compared, 1 Computer L.J. 359 (1978), Richard M. Mcgonigal
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Computer-Assisted Legal Research Case Digest, 1 Computer L.J. 405 (1978), Robert N. Schlesinger
Computer-Assisted Legal Research Case Digest, 1 Computer L.J. 405 (1978), Robert N. Schlesinger
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.