Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (184)
- UIC School of Law (77)
- University of Colorado Law School (10)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
-
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- BLR (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- California Western School of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- The University of Akron (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal research (13)
- Law (12)
- Technology (10)
- Algorithms (9)
- Black box (9)
-
- Empirical (8)
- Human/computer interaction (8)
- Language (8)
- Logic (8)
- Electronic legal research (7)
- Privacy (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Artificial intelligence (6)
- ESG (6)
- Law and computers (6)
- Securities and exchange commission (6)
- Computers (5)
- Copyright (5)
- Data (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Electronic search capabilities (5)
- Machine-readable data (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities Law (5)
- AI (4)
- Addiction (4)
- Administrative Law (4)
- Antitrust (4)
- Artificial Intelligence (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law (73)
- Publications (8)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (7)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (7)
-
- Articles (6)
- ExpressO (3)
- Georgia State University Law Review (3)
- Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Research Data (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- UIC Law Review (2)
- Akron Law Review (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Books (1)
- Canadian Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Librarian Scholarship (1)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 211 - 240 of 312
Full-Text Articles in Legal Writing and Research
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 251 (2014), Amany Awad, Kelly O'Neill, Arlo Walsman
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
The Thirty-Third Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 31 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 285 (2014), Sara Schroeder, Austin Hoffman, Becky Fey
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 339 (2013), Dana Benedetti, Daniel Johnson, Kalli Kling, Samantha Levin, Zayna Nubani, Pamela Szelung
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 339 (2013), Dana Benedetti, Daniel Johnson, Kalli Kling, Samantha Levin, Zayna Nubani, Pamela Szelung
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
.
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 373 (2013), Eliana Albelbaisi, Robert Koehl, Todd Smith
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 373 (2013), Eliana Albelbaisi, Robert Koehl, Todd Smith
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
.
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 403 (2013), Samuel Bragg, Leslie Brockhoeft, Matthew Vinson
The Thirty-Second Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 30 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 403 (2013), Samuel Bragg, Leslie Brockhoeft, Matthew Vinson
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
.
Giving Purpose To Your Life As A Legal Writer, David Spratt
Giving Purpose To Your Life As A Legal Writer, David Spratt
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Safe To Be Open: Study On The Protection Of Research Data And Recommendations For Access And Usage, Lucie Guibault, Andreas Wiebe
Safe To Be Open: Study On The Protection Of Research Data And Recommendations For Access And Usage, Lucie Guibault, Andreas Wiebe
Books
Openness has become a common concept in a growing number of scientific and academic fields. Expressions such as Open Access (OA) or Open Content (OC) are often employed for publications of papers and research results, or are contained as conditions in tenders issued by a number of funding agencies. More recently the concept of Open Data (OD) is of growing interest in some fields, particularly those that produce large amounts of data – which are not usually protected by standard legal tools such as copyright. However, a thorough understanding of the meaning of Openness – especially its legal implications – …
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 673 (2012), Russell Bottom, Greer Herman, Catherine Nance, Robin Ann Sowizrol, Gina Spada
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 673 (2012), Russell Bottom, Greer Herman, Catherine Nance, Robin Ann Sowizrol, Gina Spada
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 701 (2012), Kyle Fonville, Grace Hwang, Nivesh Oudit
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 701 (2012), Kyle Fonville, Grace Hwang, Nivesh Oudit
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 733 (2012), Christopher Dabney, Kara Franklin
The Thirty-First Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 733 (2012), Christopher Dabney, Kara Franklin
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Federal Register 2.0: Public Participation In The Twenty-First Century, Lauren R. Dudley
Federal Register 2.0: Public Participation In The Twenty-First Century, Lauren R. Dudley
Legislation and Policy Brief
On July 26, 2010, the Office of the Federal Register and the Government Printing Office (GPO) launched “Federal Register 2.0,” a web version of the daily Federal Register. As of now, the site is only a prototype; therefore, “Federal Register 2.0” is not yet an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and it will not become official until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting “Federal Register 2.0” official legal status. Once “Federal Register 2.0” becomes official, the website will allow the public to receive notice of proposed agency regulations, link to a separate …
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 75 (2011), Russell Bottom, Matthew T. Andris, Robin Ann Sowizrol
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 75 (2011), Russell Bottom, Matthew T. Andris, Robin Ann Sowizrol
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 103 (2011), Nate Lindsey, Chris Omlid
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 103 (2011), Nate Lindsey, Chris Omlid
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 139 (2011), Elena Jacob, Steven Osit, Darya Zuravicky
The Thirtieth Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 29 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 139 (2011), Elena Jacob, Steven Osit, Darya Zuravicky
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Make Your Life Easier: Free Online Productivity Tools And Resources, Kincaid C. Brown
Make Your Life Easier: Free Online Productivity Tools And Resources, Kincaid C. Brown
Law Librarian Scholarship
CiteGenie works primarily for caselaw and Internet resource research but is experimenting with the ability to add citations for statutes and regulations. CiteGenie provides a number of formatting options and allows you to choose citation rules for a particular state, use parallel citations, remove star-pagination marks from quoted texts, and personalize abbreviations. This tool is easy to use; when researching in Firefox, select CiteGenie from the right-click menu and a pop-up displays the copied text and citation to be pasted.
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 81 (2010), Erin Murphy-Hillstrom, Whitney Hutchinson, Efthymios Katsarelis, Amber Lynn Wagner, Panagiota Kelali
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 81 (2010), Erin Murphy-Hillstrom, Whitney Hutchinson, Efthymios Katsarelis, Amber Lynn Wagner, Panagiota Kelali
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Petitioner, Aaron Murphy, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the grant of summary judgment in favor of Respondent, MarshCODE, on his claims of defamation, false light invasion of privacy, and breach of contract. Thus, there are now three issues before the Marshall Supreme Court. The first two issues concern whether an individual can maintain an action of defamation and false light invasion of privacy when the false statement arose because of a computer malfunction. The last issue concerns whether the unilateral modification of a privacy agreement constitutes a breach of contract when assent to the modification …
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Petitioner, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 119 (2010), Kelly Foss, Vince Lombardozzi, Jared Palmer
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Petitioner, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 119 (2010), Kelly Foss, Vince Lombardozzi, Jared Palmer
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The circuit court erred when it granted summary judgment in favor of MarshCODE because Mr. Murphy has demonstrated facts to support the elements of the (1) defamation, (2) false light invasion of privacy, and (3) breach of contract claims. First, Mr. Murphy has provided facts to support the defamation claim. MarshCODE made a false and defamatory statement about Mr. Murphy when it told Ms. Who that he was her father. Because this matter concerns Mr. Murphy's private life, a negligence standard applies rather than the First Amendment's actual malice standard. Mr. Murphy has demonstrated that MarshCODE acted either negligently or …
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Respondent, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 151 (2010), Kimberly Hodgman, Jody Rodenberg, Erin Tyler
The Twenty-Ninth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For Respondent, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 151 (2010), Kimberly Hodgman, Jody Rodenberg, Erin Tyler
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
The First District Court of Appeals properly affirmed summary judgment on behalf of MarshCODE because Appellant failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact on his defamation claim. First, MarshCODE's accidental disclosure of information, which implied that Appellant participated in premarital sex or had a homosexual child, was not defamatory because an average person would not lower his estimation or be deterred from associating with Appellant based on such a statement. Second, no publication was made because MarshCODE did not act with negligence and was unaware of the program malfunction that resulted in the release of the information. Third, …
Safeguarding "The Precious": Counsel On Law Journal Publication Agreements In Digital Times, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 217 (2010), Michael N. Widener
Safeguarding "The Precious": Counsel On Law Journal Publication Agreements In Digital Times, 28 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 217 (2010), Michael N. Widener
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Heaping scholarship fills the academic print and online press about where legal scholars should publish and how to have one’s paper accepted for publication. But there is scarce writing about the contractual relationship between the law journal and the author of an accepted paper. This may be due in part to broadly misconstrued or ignored publication agrees, or perhaps that the business relationship is unworthy of scholarly attention. Regardless, this paper introduces a pragmatist’s perspective on evaluating and revising publication agreements, and informs student editors how publication agreements accomplish a journal’s objectives, based on current copyright law. Finally, this paper …
The New Ontologies: The Effect Of Copyright Protection On Public Scientific Data Sharing Using Semantic Web Ontologies, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 181 (2010), Andrew Clearwater
The New Ontologies: The Effect Of Copyright Protection On Public Scientific Data Sharing Using Semantic Web Ontologies, 10 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 181 (2010), Andrew Clearwater
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
The semantic web is going to become an important tool for scientists who need to accurately share data given context through structured relationships. The structure that defines contextual relationships on the semantic web is known as an ontology; which is a hierarchical organization of a knowledge domain that contains entities and their relations. This paper seeks to answer whether semantic web ontologies are protectable by copyright, and regardless of the outcome, what the best practices are for the scientific community. The best practices for the scientific community should include the adoption of a machine readable ontology license which disclaims copyright …
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 95 (2009), Sarah M. Knight, William S. Weltman, Andrew T. Call, Panagiota Kelali
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 95 (2009), Sarah M. Knight, William S. Weltman, Andrew T. Call, Panagiota Kelali
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Petitioner, Phillip Nevilson, appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from a decision affirming the granting of summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Marshoogle, Inc., on his claims of intrusion upon seclusion, publication of private facts, and tortious interference with business expectancy claims. The issues in this case concern whether an individual can state a claim for invasion of privacy against an Internet search engine provider where liability is based on taking a photograph of an individual in his home and the publication of such photograph on a website. The final issue concerns whether the act of publication of the photograph …
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 131 (2009), Megan Peterson, Tyler Rench
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 131 (2009), Megan Peterson, Tyler Rench
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT: As encroaching technologies shrink the realm of privacy and expose intimate details of the home, courts must craft a solution that will provide a remedy to the injured. When Marshoogle’s prying cameras took photographs of Nevilson seated inside his home, they invaded his privacy by intruding into his private area of seclusion and this court should give Nevilson the opportunity to seek a remedy. Because Nevilson was inside his home when the images were captured, he had a reasonable expectation of privacy, which cannot be lost simply by leaving his curtains open. Marshoogle’s cameras were intentionally …
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 169 (2009), Michael Jones, Stuart Ladner, Sabrina Stone
2009 John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 27 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 169 (2009), Michael Jones, Stuart Ladner, Sabrina Stone
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT: Nevilson has not raised a genuine issue of material fact on his intrusion upon seclusion claim. First, Nevilson cannot show Marshoogle intentionally invaded Nevilson’s privacy. When Marshoogle captured the images for its Marshall Avenue Perspective feature, no one physically entered Nevilson’s property or used sensory enhancements or telephoto lenses to pry into his private space. Second, Marshoogle’s actions were not highly offensive to a reasonable person because the photographs were not captured in an effort to exploit or defame Nevilson, but rather were captured in an effort to produce a free and effective virtual map for …
The Definitional Hub Of E-Commerce: "Record", Christina L. Kunz
The Definitional Hub Of E-Commerce: "Record", Christina L. Kunz
Faculty Scholarship
This Article is a drafting history and a white paper on “record,” setting out the ABA's Working Group on Electronic Writings and Notices' (WG) deliberations and choices, the WG's interactions with concurrent and subsequent UCC redraft committees, the principles and policies underlying the WG's final decisions, and uses of “record” in subsequent statutes.
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 337 (2008), Joshua Deitz, Kakuti Lin, Lindsey Shinn
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 337 (2008), Joshua Deitz, Kakuti Lin, Lindsey Shinn
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 305 (2008), Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Panagiota Kelali, Jessica Diehl, Carlos A. Encinas, Matthew Hector, Gina Spada, Steven Tseng, Priya Krishnamoorthy Venkat
The Twenty-Sixth Annual John Marshall International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Bench Memorandum, 25 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 305 (2008), Leslie Ann Reis, David E. Sorkin, Panagiota Kelali, Jessica Diehl, Carlos A. Encinas, Matthew Hector, Gina Spada, Steven Tseng, Priya Krishnamoorthy Venkat
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
Wikipedia Made Law? The Federal Judicial Citation Of Wikipedia, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 229 (2008), Amber Lynn Wagner
Wikipedia Made Law? The Federal Judicial Citation Of Wikipedia, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 229 (2008), Amber Lynn Wagner
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
In this comment the author examines the new and growing body of federal opinions citing Wikipedia an authoritative source. The comment details how Wikipedia articles are generated, and the ease with which anyone can edit them, to illustrate their shortcomings as sources for making judicial determinations. The author provides examples of federal cases where judges rely on Wikipedia to define terms ranging from colloquial phrases to medical equipment. The author points out that in spite of several academic institutions and the U.S. Trade and Patent Office banning it as a source, federal judges continue to rely on Wikipedia in their …
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law:Summary Of Bench Memorandum, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 259 (2008), Robin Ficke, James Lai, Steven Tseng, Panagiota Kelali
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law:Summary Of Bench Memorandum, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 259 (2008), Robin Ficke, James Lai, Steven Tseng, Panagiota Kelali
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
Petitioner, Alex Romero (“Romero”), appeals to the Marshall Supreme Court from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent, Windbucket Entertainment, LLC (“Windbucket”). Romero’s lawsuit alleged that Windbucket and a third party (not a party to the present appeal) were liable to him for invasion of privacy by intrusion upon seclusion. Romero then sought discovery sanctions against Windbucket for violations of Marshall Rule of Civil Procedure 37. The issues in the case concern whether a subscriber to an Internet-based, multiplayer computer game can state a valid invasion of privacy claim against the game’s publisher, when liability is based on …
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 283 (2008), David Caras, Jennifer Robbins, Zach Rudisill
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Petitioner, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 283 (2008), David Caras, Jennifer Robbins, Zach Rudisill
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 321 (2008), Adam Powell, Erin Blake, Kris Kokotayo
The Twenty-Seventh Annual John Marshall Law School International Moot Court Competition In Information Technology And Privacy Law: Brief For The Respondent, 26 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 321 (2008), Adam Powell, Erin Blake, Kris Kokotayo
UIC John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law
No abstract provided.