Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (20)
- Constitutional Law (19)
- Courts (16)
- Law and Society (14)
- Jurisprudence (11)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Civil Law (9)
- Civil Procedure (9)
- Legal History (9)
- First Amendment (8)
- Judges (8)
- Litigation (8)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (7)
- Law and Economics (7)
- Law and Politics (7)
- Law and Race (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Rule of Law (7)
- Torts (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (6)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- President/Executive Department (6)
- Business Organizations Law (5)
- Common Law (5)
- Criminal Law (5)
- Education Law (5)
- Evidence (5)
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (7)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- New York Law School (2)
-
- Pepperdine University (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- NYLS Law Review (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
-
- Scholarly Works (2)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Catholic University Law Review (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Journal of Public Policy and Practice (1)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (1)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 34 of 34
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Mental Health Courts And Title Ii Of The Ada: Accessibility To State Court Systems For Individuals With Mental Disabilities And The Need For Diversion, S. Elizabeth Malloy
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
Access to the judicial system, a fundamental right that has paramount importance in our society, can often present obstacles to people with disabilities in a variety of significant ways. Yet Title II mandates that state and local judicial facilities be accessible to individuals with disabilities. Recent shifts in paradigmatic approaches to special populations such as drug offenders and offenders with mental disabilities have lead to the creation of mental health courts specifically designed to address the needs of the persons with mental disabilities in order to avoid incarceration. Early outcomes in states like Ohio suggest mental health courts may better …
Supreme Court 2002 Term - The Property Cases: Iolta, Qui Tam Actions, And Punitive Damages (Symposium: The Fifteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Latest Word From The Supreme Court On Punitive Damages (Symposium: The Thirteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
The Latest Word From The Supreme Court On Punitive Damages (Symposium: The Thirteenth Annual Supreme Court Review), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Full Faith And Credit And The Equity Conflict, Polly J. Price
Full Faith And Credit And The Equity Conflict, Polly J. Price
Faculty Articles
As this Article relates, the current problem with interstate enforcement of injunctions and other equitable decrees is illustrated by the Court's confusion in Baker. The Court reached the correct result in the case before it, but the basic problems of "equity conflict" remain unresolved. Both the Court's opinion and the two concurrences were unsatisfactory because the Court failed to address the key underlying issue of whether or to what extent courts may rely on state law to enjoin extraterritorial conduct. Had the Court focused on this issue, I argue, it could have based its decision upon a more appealing rationale. …