Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Torts (157)
- Legislation (63)
- Litigation (54)
- Contracts (52)
- Courts (49)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (43)
- State and Local Government Law (37)
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Civil Procedure (29)
- Property Law and Real Estate (28)
- Common Law (24)
- Labor and Employment Law (24)
- Jurisdiction (20)
- Law and Economics (20)
- Securities Law (20)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (19)
- Criminal Law (19)
- Business Organizations Law (18)
- Commercial Law (18)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- Admiralty (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Intellectual Property Law (14)
- Legal History (14)
- Estates and Trusts (12)
- Insurance Law (12)
- International Law (12)
- Law and Psychology (11)
- Keyword
-
- Damages (98)
- Liability (61)
- Injuries (58)
- Compensation (57)
- Law reform (37)
-
- Negligence (35)
- United States Supreme Court (34)
- Recovery (26)
- Restitution (26)
- Judgments (25)
- Punitive damages (19)
- Michigan (18)
- Victims (17)
- Causes of action (15)
- Injunctions (14)
- Juries (14)
- Products liability (14)
- Federal courts (13)
- Obligations (13)
- Remedies (13)
- Risk (13)
- Settlements (13)
- State courts (13)
- Trials (13)
- Corporations (12)
- England (12)
- Fraud (12)
- Class actions (11)
- Damage (11)
- Equity (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (268)
- Articles (86)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (63)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (13)
- Books (6)
-
- Book Chapters (5)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (5)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (4)
- Reviews (4)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (3)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (2)
- Michigan Journal of Gender & Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (1)
- Michigan Law Review Online (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 463
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Equity-Bill To Remove Cloud From Title
Equity-Bill To Remove Cloud From Title
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff who was holder of a long term lease on the land and buildings in Chicago known as the Auditorium found that its plans for rebuilding so as to secure a return commensurate with its investment were seriously interfered with by the defendant lessors who took the position that wrecking the old building would constitute such waste as would work a forfeiture of the lease. The publicity of these claims, made the financial underwriters insist on a settlement of them before advances were made. Under this posture of affairs, the plaintiff filed a bill in the United States District Court …
Constitutional Law-Methods Of Testing The Constitutionality Of Rate Status Involving Heavy Penalties
Constitutional Law-Methods Of Testing The Constitutionality Of Rate Status Involving Heavy Penalties
Michigan Law Review
Where a state statute prescribes maximum intrastate railroad rates and also attaches heavy penalties for violations of the statute by a railroad or its agents, and where a railroad thinks the rates are confiscatory and hence unconstitutional, it is faced with an apparent dilemma. Must it either submit to the supposed confiscatory rates or else run the chance of incurring heavy penalties in case the statute is held constitutional? Or, is there another alternative-a painless way of testing the validity of the rates?
Injunction Against Search By Police Officers
Injunction Against Search By Police Officers
Michigan Law Review
A nice equipoise of public and private interest is disclosed in the case of Des Moines Drug Co. v. Doe, in which the Iowa Supreme Court recently had occasion to consider questions raised by a bill in equity to enjoin a search by police officers endeavouring to enforce the liquor laws.
Declaratory Judgments Under State Statutes In Federal Courts
Declaratory Judgments Under State Statutes In Federal Courts
Michigan Law Review
Will the federal courts render declaratory judgments when sitting in states which have adopted statutes authorizing that form of relief? A recent decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, written by Justice Sanford, has thrown the whole problem of declaratory judgments in the federal courts into a most unfortunate state of confusion. Liberty Warehouse Co. v. B. S. Grannis, 47 Sup. Ct. Rep. 282.
The Early Liability Of A Bailee, Norman F. Arterburn
The Early Liability Of A Bailee, Norman F. Arterburn
Michigan Law Review
All discussion of the origin of the absolute liability of a common carrier of goods naturally harks back to the earliest conception of a bailment and its related remedies. We have had two diametrically opposed views urged as to the first liability of the ordinary bailee. Justice Holmes and numerous other authorities take the view that the liability in the' first instance was absolute in the case of all bailees. Professor Beale is the exponent of the opposing view, that such liability was qualified to such an extent that it amounted in fact, only to negligence liability. An interpretation of …
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Michigan Law Review
An interesting recent decision in Minnesota, Schendel v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., raises two important questions concerning the effect to be given in one state of the Union to a judgment rendered in the courts of another. An action was brought in Minnesota by a special administrator, there appointed, to recover damages for the death of his decedent. The accident resulting in death had occurred in Iowa while the decedent, it was claimed, was engaged in inter-state commerce, so as to bring the claim within the federal statute. To this Minnesota action the defendant set up …
The Doctrine Of Price V. Neal, Ralph W. Aigler
The Doctrine Of Price V. Neal, Ralph W. Aigler
Michigan Law Review
In 1715 the case of Jenys v. Fawler, et al. came before Lord Raymond at the Guildhall. It was an action by the indorsee of a bill of exchange against the acceptor who offered to prove by witnesses who were acquainted with the drawer's signature and who believed that the signature of the drawer appearing on the bill in suit was not genuine, that the bill really was a forgery. The Chief Justice refused to admit the testimony "from the danger to negotiable notes, and because a man might with design write contrary to his usual method." This indicates that …
Contracts-Risk Of Loss Between Vendor And Purchaser In Land Contract
Contracts-Risk Of Loss Between Vendor And Purchaser In Land Contract
Michigan Law Review
Plaintiff entered into a contract to sell his grocery business to the defendant for a specified amount, part payment to be by way of the conveyance of a house and lot owned by the defendant, the title to pass upon payment by the plaintiff of certain outstanding debts of the grocery business. Subsequent to the execution of the contract, but before conveyance of the house and lot and while the defendant was still in possession, the house was destroyed by fire and the plaintiff sues to have $2,500 substituted, that amount being the agreed valuation at which the property was …
Parent And Child-Action By Parent For Loss Of Services Of Child-Contributory Negligence Of Child As A Defense
Michigan Law Review
It appears to be axiomatic with the courts that a parent cannot recover damages for the loss of services of a child, because of an injury negligently inflicted by a third person, if the child was guilty of contributory negligence. Nearly all of the decisions on this point have been reached without any reason being given for the result. Typical opinions, in which any explanation of the rule is conspicuously avoided, may be found in Chicago & G. E. Ry. Co. v. Harney, 28 Ind. 28; Dietrich v. Baltimore, etc. Ry. Co. 58 Md. 347; Cleveland C. & C. …
Carriers-Can Carrier Who Delivers To Improper Person Replevy From The Vendee Of That Person?
Carriers-Can Carrier Who Delivers To Improper Person Replevy From The Vendee Of That Person?
Michigan Law Review
When a carrier delivers goods to an improper person, a nice question arises as to whether the carrier may recover the goods from a bona fide purchaser who bought from the one to whom the carrier delivered. Let us consider first a comparatively simple case.
Estoppels-Legal And Equitable-Question As To Whether Equitable Estoppels May Be A Defense At Law
Estoppels-Legal And Equitable-Question As To Whether Equitable Estoppels May Be A Defense At Law
Michigan Law Review
An estoppel has been defined as "an impediment or bar, by which a man is precluded from alleging, or denying a fact, in consequence of his own previous act, allegation, or denial to the contrary". Jacob. In both law and equity estoppels were introduced at a very early date. Legal estoppels long antedated Coke, who attempted to enumerate them. Co. LIT. (17th ed.) 352, a. In fact, in some forms, as the estoppels by deed and of record, legal estoppels must have existed from the early beginnings of the common law. The doctrine which gave rise to equitable estoppels also …
Subrogation-The Effect On Equity Jurisdiction Of The Legal Remedy Becoming Adequate
Subrogation-The Effect On Equity Jurisdiction Of The Legal Remedy Becoming Adequate
Michigan Law Review
As the common law courts develop and discard many of their technical rules it often happens that a remedy at law formerly inadequate becomes perfectly adequate to administer substantial justice to all parties concerned. When such a situation arises the question is raised as to whether or not equity jurisdiction in that field has been ousted. Historically the greatest factor in equitable relief was the inadequacy of the remedy at law. From a strictly logical point of view it would seem that when the remedy at law becomes adequate the Chancellor is pro tanto deprived of his· right to give …
The Remedies Of A Landlord Against A Subtenant
The Remedies Of A Landlord Against A Subtenant
Michigan Law Review
As against the assignee of the lessee the landlord at common law has practically the same remedies that he had against the original lessee. He can distrain on goods found on the leased premises, to secure rent which is in arrears, 2 TIFFANY, LANDLORD AND TENNANT, § 328; and he has the right to re-enter on breach of expressed condition. 2 TIFFANY, LANDLORD AND TENANT, § 194h. As there is privity of estate between the parties, the landlord can recover for breaches of those covenants in the lease, which run with the land. These primarily are those which touch and …
Are All Permanent Injunctions Temporary?
Are All Permanent Injunctions Temporary?
Michigan Law Review
Injunctions may be classified with reference to the stage in the cause at which they are granted, viz. at a preliminary bearing, or at a final bearing, and they may be classified with reference to the time for which they are to stand, viz. for a limited period, or in perpetuity. For the first distinction we have a superfluity of terms. "Temporary," "provisional," "interlocutory," "ad interim" "pendente lite" indicate the first class: "permanent," "perpetual," "final," indicate the second class. But unfortunately several of these terms also suggest the character of the injunction with regard to …
Simplified Civil Procedure Under The Wisconsin Code
Simplified Civil Procedure Under The Wisconsin Code
Michigan Law Review
A rare illustration of the possibility of simplified procedure, under the modern codes, is presented by a recent decision of the Wisconsin court. Singularly enough the case was also productive of some very interesting problems of substantive law, and will be commented upon, from that standpoint, elsewhere in this publication. As for the fact situation, it will be sufficient for our present purposes, to note that the plaintiff was injured, while riding as a guest, as the result of a collision occasioned by the negligent driving of her host and the operator of another automobile. The guest and the driver …
Remedies, Rights, And Equitable Estates
Remedies, Rights, And Equitable Estates
Michigan Law Review
Reasoning from remedies to rights has always been in vogue. In primitive law, as Sir Henry Maine observed, the law of actions has such ascendency that "the substantive law has at first the look of being gradually secreted in the interstices of procedure." EARLY LAW AND CUSTOM, 389. As law matures, the distinction between substantive and adjective law becomes clearly recognized and it becomes the common method of legal analysis to found conclusions as to rights and duties upon bases remote from procedure and then to turn to adjective law demanding a remedy for the rights thus established. This process …
Error Without Prejudice
Michigan Law Review
An examination of almost any of our reports of decisions now current, will impress one with the great number of cases reported in which the courts discuss the matter of reversal for error as affected by the question of whether prejudice results from such error.
Injunction As Remedy For Unlawful Taxation
Injunction As Remedy For Unlawful Taxation
Michigan Law Review
Whether or not a court of equity should issue an injunction restraining the assessment or collection of an illegal or wrongful tax is a question concerning which there is little harmony among the cases and writers. 4 POMEROY, EQUITY JURISPRUDENCE, ed. 4, §1781; HIGH, lNJUNCTIONS, ed. 3, §484, p. 363; 37 HARV. L. REV. 255.
Resale Price Fixing From A Different Angle
Resale Price Fixing From A Different Angle
Michigan Law Review
The proposition that resale price fixing agreements are illegal, while by no means universally accepted, is definitely established in the federal courts as well as in quite a number of the state courts. Whatever we may think of its soundness from an economic viewpoint it will doubtless receive even wider recognition as time goes on. For a collection and discussion of the authorities see 20 MICH. L. REV. 904; 19 MICH. L. REV. 265; 19 A. L. R. 925.
Recovery Of Property From Alien Property Custodian
Recovery Of Property From Alien Property Custodian
Michigan Law Review
ln Banco Mexicano v. Deutsche Bank, 44 Sup. Ct. 209, both facts and law lie in a narrow compass. On June 15, 1916, the liquidators of the Banco Mexicano made a loan of $500,000 to the Deutsche Bank. Hugo Schmidt, the well-known agent of the Deutsche Bank, in the United States from 1914 to 1917 negotiated the loan and deposited the amount received with the Guaranty Trust Company of New York to the credit of the general account of the Deutsche Bank. When the United States entered the war on April 6, 1917, the Guaranty Trust Company reported the …
Anticipatory Breach And The Enforcement Of Contractual Duties, Henry Winthrop Ballantine
Anticipatory Breach And The Enforcement Of Contractual Duties, Henry Winthrop Ballantine
Michigan Law Review
The doctrine of anticipatory breach, announced in England in 1853 in the leading case of Hochster v. De La, Tour, presents some interesting questions of legal theory. While it has been almost universally accepted by the courts of this country, the principles upon which the doctrine rests have been seriously questioned and the courts have shown an unfortunate bewilderment and hesitation in its extension and application. Professor Williston, probably the leading American authority in the field of contracts, has for many years been a vigorous critic of this doctrine. He goes so far as to assert that the doctrine …
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 1), Edwin D. Dickinson
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 1), Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
From the decision of this novel case, reported as Pelzer v. United Dredging Co., we may infer that the New York courts regard unrecognized Mexico as a sort of legal vacuum. In granting the corporation's motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Supreme Court said: "The administratrix plaintiff is an officer of a foreign court. It is syllogistically true that if the foreign court has no recognized power here she may not assert a right derived through her appointment therefrom. The Mexican government is not de facto here, since recognition alone can make it so. It may have all the …
Declaratory Judgments, Edson R. Sunderland
Declaratory Judgments, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
The Connecticut legislature passed an act in 1921 authorizing courts to make binding declarations of rights. The act was attacked as unconstitutional on the same ground raised by the supreme court of Michigan against the Michigan Declaratory Judgment Act in the case of Anway v. Railway Co., 211 Mich. 592, 12 A. L. R. 26i namely, that declaring rights was not a judicial function. But the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut sustdined the act as in no way contravening the constitution.
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 2), Edwin D. Dickinson
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 2), Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
PROBABLY no one in the British Empire or the United States would question the doctrine that it belongs exclusively to the political departments to recognize new governments or states. The difficulties involved are those which arise in the application of a doctrine so broadly stated. Not every situation involving an unrecognized government or state requires the decision of a question of recognition. If the decision of a political question is not involved, then it is entirely proper for the courts to take cognizance of a mere de facto government or state. In what situations may the courts appropriately take account …
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Note And Comment, Edgar N. Durfee, Cyril E. Bailey, Edwin B. Stason, William C. O'Keefe, Clyde Y. Morris
Michigan Law Review
The Basis of Relief from Penalties and Forfeitures - The equitable principle of relief from penalties and forfeitures is so far elementary as almost to defy analysis. Many, perhaps most, of the judicial explanations of the principle have based it upon interpretation or construction, appealing to the doctrine that equity regards intent rather than form. Yet a logical application of this doctrine would lead to results very different from those which have actually been arrived at in the decisions. Thus, a stipulation in a mortgage that the mortgagor waives his equity of redemption can hardly be interpreted as meaning that …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …
Emotional Disturbance As Legal Damage, Herbert F. Goodrich
Emotional Disturbance As Legal Damage, Herbert F. Goodrich
Michigan Law Review
Mental pain or anxiety the law cannot value, and does not pretend to redress, when the unlawful act complained of causes that alone." Lord Wensleydale's famous dictum in Lynch v. Knight1 will serve as a starting point for this discussion. His lordship's notion of mental pain is evidently that of a "state of mind" or feeling, hidden in the inner consciousness of the individual; an intangible, evanescent something too elusive for the hardheaded workaday common law to handle. Likewise, in that very interesting problem regarding recovery for damages sustained through fright, it is always assumed, tacitly or expressly, that mere …
Emotional Disturbance As Legal Damage, Herbert F. Goodrich
Emotional Disturbance As Legal Damage, Herbert F. Goodrich
Articles
MENTAL pain or anxiety the law cannot value, and does not pretend to redress, when the unlawful act complained of causes that alone. Lord Wensleydale's famous dictum in Lynch v. Knight will serve as a starting point for this discussion. His lordship's notion of mental pain is evidently that of a "state of mind" or feeling, hidden in the inner consciousness of the individual; an intangible, evanescent something too elusive for the hardheaded workaday common law to handle. Likewise, in that very interesting problem regarding recovery for damages sustained through fright, it is always assumed, tacitly or expressly, that mere …
Basis Of Relief From Penalties And Forfeitures, Edgar N. Durfee
Basis Of Relief From Penalties And Forfeitures, Edgar N. Durfee
Articles
The equitable principle of relief from penalties and forfeitures is so far elementary as almost to defy analysis. Many, perhaps most, of the judicial explanations of the principle have based it upon interpretation or construction, appealing to the doctrine that equity regards intent rather than form. Yet a logical application of this doctrine would lead to results very different from those which have actually been arrived at in the decisions. Thus, a stipulation in a mortgage that the mortgagor waives his equity of redemption can hardly be interpreted as meaning that he does not waive it, yet all such stipulations …
Mutuality In Specific Performance, Edgar N. Durfee
Mutuality In Specific Performance, Edgar N. Durfee
Articles
Prior to the present century, the subject of mutuality in specific performance was an unsolved puzzle. The decisions of the courts were in the main wise, but the attempts both of courts and text writers to formulate a statement of the principle governing these decisions were far from happy. After two centuries of litigation and discussion, the current formula was that the remedy must be mutual, must be equally available to both parties. The worst fault of this formula was its plausibility. Equality is equity, and perfect equality between the parties to a contract is not attained unless remedies are …