Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (199)
- St. Mary's University (58)
- University of Michigan Law School (49)
- Pepperdine University (31)
- University of Colorado Law School (25)
-
- Brooklyn Law School (20)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (19)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (14)
- New York Law School (12)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (11)
- BLR (10)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Fordham Law School (6)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (6)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (5)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
- Emory University School of Law (3)
- Georgia State University College of Law (3)
- University of Maine School of Law (3)
- University of Rhode Island (3)
- University of Washington School of Law (3)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (3)
- Brigham Young University Law School (2)
- Cornell University Law School (2)
- Keyword
-
- Remedies (32)
- Courts (27)
- Damages (22)
- Supreme Court (16)
- Federal courts (15)
-
- Litigation (14)
- Regulation (14)
- United States Supreme Court (14)
- Law (13)
- Texas (13)
- Constitution (12)
- Constitutional Law (12)
- Judges (12)
- Jurisdiction (12)
- Constitutional law (11)
- Evidence (11)
- Ethics (10)
- First Amendment (10)
- Jurisprudence (10)
- Technology (10)
- Arbitration (9)
- Compensation (9)
- Corporations (9)
- Dispute Resolution (9)
- Due process (9)
- Injuries (9)
- Punitive damages (9)
- State courts (9)
- Torts (9)
- United States (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (198)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (26)
- Michigan Law Review (23)
- Articles (18)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (17)
-
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (16)
- Publications (15)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (15)
- Pepperdine Law Review (14)
- NYLS Law Review (12)
- Northwestern University Law Review (11)
- Natural Gas Symposium: Contract Solutions for the Future of Regulatory Environment (March 24-25) (10)
- ExpressO (9)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (9)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (7)
- Brooklyn Law Review (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (6)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (5)
- Fordham Law Review (5)
- Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review (4)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (4)
- University of Cincinnati Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 541 - 570 of 572
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
The Infliction Of Emotional Distress As An Independent Tort: The Necessity Of Physical Injury - Mcdowell V. Davis, 33 N.C. App. 529, 235 S.E. 2d 896 (1977), Wayne O. Clontz
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Separation Of Powers And The Scope Of Federal Equitable Remedies, Robert F. Nagel
Separation Of Powers And The Scope Of Federal Equitable Remedies, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira P. Robbins, Michael B. Buser
Punitive Conditions Of Prison Confinement: An Analysis Of Pugh V. Locke And Federal Court Supervision Of State Penal Administration Under The Eighth Amendment, Ira P. Robbins, Michael B. Buser
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Remittitur Practice In The Federal Courts, Irene D. Johnson
Remittitur Practice In The Federal Courts, Irene D. Johnson
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The first section of this Note examines and evaluates the mechanics of remittitur procedure in the federal courts. The second section focuses on the major unresolved issue of remittitur procedure: whether a plaintiff who elects to remit is entitled to appellate review of the remittitur order. The final section of the Note evaluate remitting-plaintiff appeal procedures and suggest some ways in which federal remittitur procedure might be made more efficient and more responsive to policy objectives.
Current Problems Of Accountants' Responsibilities To Third Parties, T. J. Fiflis
Current Problems Of Accountants' Responsibilities To Third Parties, T. J. Fiflis
Publications
No abstract provided.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
The Consumer Class Action, Arthur H. Travers Jr., Jonathan M. Landers
Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Removal And Injunction To Protect Political Expression And Racial Equality: A Proposed Change, Christopher B. Mueller
Federal Removal And Injunction To Protect Political Expression And Racial Equality: A Proposed Change, Christopher B. Mueller
Publications
No abstract provided.
Res Judicata/Preclusion By Judgment: The Law Applied In Federal Courts, Allan D. Vestal
Res Judicata/Preclusion By Judgment: The Law Applied In Federal Courts, Allan D. Vestal
Michigan Law Review
Preclusion is not a simple principle; it is a multifaceted concept affected by a number of relevant variables. A discussion of the principles is meaningful only if specific situations are discussed; to talk in generalities is not profitable. Therefore, for the sake of clarity, this Article will consider several typical situations.
The Consent Decree In Antitrust Enforcement--Analysis And Criticism, J. Dennis Hynes
The Consent Decree In Antitrust Enforcement--Analysis And Criticism, J. Dennis Hynes
Publications
No abstract provided.
Habeas Corpus - Jurisdiction - Exhaustion Of State Remedies As Prerequisite To Federal Relief, John D. Kelly S.Ed.
Habeas Corpus - Jurisdiction - Exhaustion Of State Remedies As Prerequisite To Federal Relief, John D. Kelly S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
Petitioner, a prisoner of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania convicted of armed robbery in 1947, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal district court after several efforts to secure the writ in a state court had been unsuccessful. Jurisdiction was based on exhaustion of available state remedies. The petition alleged that the Commonwealth had violated petitioner's rights under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by denying him the right to be represented by counsel at his trial. The Commonwealth moved to dismiss on the ground that the petition on its face showed that state remedies …
The Union Of Law And Equity, Charles W. Joiner, Ray A. Geddes
The Union Of Law And Equity, Charles W. Joiner, Ray A. Geddes
Michigan Law Review
This paper was prepared for the guidance of a Committee on Michigan Procedural Revision jointly created by the Michigan Legislature, the Supreme Court of Michigan, and the Michigan State Bar to recommend revision of Michigan statutes and rules. Toe need for the joinder of law and equity procedure was thought to be so fundamental that this paper was prepared as a basic study for the committee. In it an attempt is made to bring to the attention of the Michigan lawyers, judges, and legislators an analysis of the Michigan Constitution, statutes, and cases and the experience of other states that …
Compulsory Joinder Of Parties In Civil Actions, John W. Reed
Compulsory Joinder Of Parties In Civil Actions, John W. Reed
Michigan Law Review
Compulsory joinder cases involving interests in land display one peculiar and important characteristic: there is almost never any need in the state courts to wrestle with the question of whether a person is indispensable as distinguished from necessary. One hastens to add that this attribute of land cases appears to have gone largely unnoticed, but it exists none the less. It arises out of the fact that in a suit involving real property it is never impossible for the court to obtain jurisdiction over all persons interested therein to an extent which will enable the court to adjudicate controversies over …
Judicial Control Of Administrative Action By Means Of The Extraordinary Remedies In Minnesota, John A. Bauman, Stefan A. Riesenfeld, Richard C. Maxwell
Judicial Control Of Administrative Action By Means Of The Extraordinary Remedies In Minnesota, John A. Bauman, Stefan A. Riesenfeld, Richard C. Maxwell
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Wills And Administration - Jurisdiction Over The Probate Of Lost Or Destroyed Wills
Wills And Administration - Jurisdiction Over The Probate Of Lost Or Destroyed Wills
Michigan Law Review
Under Mich. Comp. Laws (1929), sec. 15547, a will lost, suppressed or destroyed may be admitted to probate upon its being established in a prescribed manner in the probate court. And under sec. 15543 no will is effectual to pass title to property unless probated as required by law. Plaintiff coal company, apparently under the direction of its manager, King, filed a bill of interpleader for a judicial determination as to whether it should pay rent as lessee of certain property to the administrator of the estate of the deceased lessor, or to King, who claimed as devisee of the …
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Michigan Law Review
A general creditor filed a bill alleging that the defendant corporation's assets as shown by its books have a value in excess of its indebtedness but that it cannot meet its current obligations although its assets, when converted into money would be sufficient to meet them and continue its business; that several suits have been instituted by defendant's creditors and that if executions are issued and levies made, defendant will be compelled to cease operations and losses will be suffered by all of defendant's creditors, whereas, if a receiver is appointed to operate its business their claims may be paid …
Practice And Procedure - Conditional Judgments At Law - Validity And Advantages
Practice And Procedure - Conditional Judgments At Law - Validity And Advantages
Michigan Law Review
Some modern courts have asserted and many lawyers have assumed that in common law actions a court can not render a judgment conditional in form. It is argued that the court is without jurisdiction so to decide a case, and that in any event the common law has never recognized such a form of judgment as valid. The first point is not so difficult to disprove, and the second, so far as actual decision is concerned, is clearly incorrect." In several early cases common law courts were willing not only to stay execution of judgments until conditions were performed, but …
Injunctions Of State Courts Restraining Parties From Proceeding In The Tribunals Of Other States
Injunctions Of State Courts Restraining Parties From Proceeding In The Tribunals Of Other States
Michigan Law Review
It has long been accepted that a court of equity, acting in personam, can enjoin one over whom it has jurisdiction from bringing an action in a foreign tribunal. A nice question is presented when an effort is made to determine on what occasions the court will exercise that power. It is frequently said that it will be exercised but sparingly, and then only where a clear equitable right is established by the petitioner. This, in spite of the strong language commonly accompanying such statements, is no more than that which the court requires for the issuance of any …
Patents - Option Of The Court To Permit Contempt Proceedings Or To Require A New Suit
Patents - Option Of The Court To Permit Contempt Proceedings Or To Require A New Suit
Michigan Law Review
A final injunction was issued by the federal district court of Massachusetts against A, a Michigan corporation. The terms of the injunction were that A should not make, use, or sell lasts, or any colorable imitation thereof, embodying the invention covered by certain enumerated claims belonging to the present complainant. In a subsequent term of court the complainant alleged a violation of the injunction and brought contempt proceedings against A in the district court. The alleged infringement consisted in the manufacture and sale of a device which was slightly changed in form from that which the defendant had made prior …
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders
Michigan Law Review
The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate over a portion of the route for which application was made for a certificate. The plaintiff applied to the federal district court for an injunction against enforcement of the commission's order on the ground that it amounted to a deprivation of property without due process. A temporary injunction was granted. Thereafter, the plaintiff took a statutory appeal to the state supreme court, which affirmed the order, after which the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction in the federal court. Held, the decision of the …
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State
Michigan Law Review
An interesting recent decision in Minnesota, Schendel v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., raises two important questions concerning the effect to be given in one state of the Union to a judgment rendered in the courts of another. An action was brought in Minnesota by a special administrator, there appointed, to recover damages for the death of his decedent. The accident resulting in death had occurred in Iowa while the decedent, it was claimed, was engaged in inter-state commerce, so as to bring the claim within the federal statute. To this Minnesota action the defendant set up …
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 1), Edwin D. Dickinson
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 1), Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
From the decision of this novel case, reported as Pelzer v. United Dredging Co., we may infer that the New York courts regard unrecognized Mexico as a sort of legal vacuum. In granting the corporation's motion for judgment on the pleadings, the Supreme Court said: "The administratrix plaintiff is an officer of a foreign court. It is syllogistically true that if the foreign court has no recognized power here she may not assert a right derived through her appointment therefrom. The Mexican government is not de facto here, since recognition alone can make it so. It may have all the …
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 2), Edwin D. Dickinson
Unrecognized Government Or State In English And American Law (Part 2), Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
PROBABLY no one in the British Empire or the United States would question the doctrine that it belongs exclusively to the political departments to recognize new governments or states. The difficulties involved are those which arise in the application of a doctrine so broadly stated. Not every situation involving an unrecognized government or state requires the decision of a question of recognition. If the decision of a political question is not involved, then it is entirely proper for the courts to take cognizance of a mere de facto government or state. In what situations may the courts appropriately take account …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …
Damage Liability Of Charitable Institutions, Carl Zollman
Damage Liability Of Charitable Institutions, Carl Zollman
Michigan Law Review
The question of the liability of charitable institutions to actions for damages presents great difficulties. This is not due how- -ever to a lack of cases. The question has peculiarly "engaged the attention of the bench and bar of the country. The problem has been scrutinized from every conceivable viewpoint. The arguments for and against have well nigh been exhausted, and little, if anything, new remains to be advanced".' In their opinions the courts have frequently gone back to certain English cases disregarding the points decided but stressing certain dicta which have been uttered by the judges which decided them. …
The Courts As Authorized Legal Advisors Of The People, Edson R. Sunderland
The Courts As Authorized Legal Advisors Of The People, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
It is doubtful whether American legal institutions have witnessed a more far-reaching procedural reform since New York adopted its Code of Civil Procedure in 1848, than the movement toward the authorization of judicial declarations of rights which has received its chief impetus from legislation enacted in three American States during the past year. A somewhat timid step in this direction was taken by the New Jersey Chancery Practice Act of 1915, but it disclosed a want of confidence in the broad effectiveness of the remedy. Now for the first time American legislation has definitely committed itself to the principle that …
The Writ Of Prohibition - Procedural Delay, Edson R. Sunderland
The Writ Of Prohibition - Procedural Delay, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
A disheartening recrudescence of procedural red-tape is found in a recent decision of the Supreme Court of Ohio. A contest arose over the jurisdiction of the Public Service Commission to fix telephone rates in Cleveland. The Commission was engaged in a determination as to the reasonableness of a schedule of rates filed by the telephone company, when a petition was filed in the Common Pleas Court for an injunction against the charging of rates other than those fixed by a city ordinance. Believing that under the statute the Public Service Commission had exclusive jurisdiction over the subject of rates, and …
Power Of The U.S. Supreme Court To Enforce Judgments Against States, Henry M. Bates
Power Of The U.S. Supreme Court To Enforce Judgments Against States, Henry M. Bates
Articles
Four and one-half centuries later the "sovereign state" of Virginia sued the "sovereign state" of West Virginia to recover a sum of money alleged to be due upon the agreement of West Virginia to assume its proportionate share of the debt of the old state of Virginia. The suit was brought in the Supreme Court of the United States, which after prolonged consideration rendered judgment for the plaintiff. No execution or other compulsory process was issued, however. But now after delays for various reasons and pretexts urged by West Virginia the court is compelled to face the problem of what …
A Modern Evolution In Remedial Rights - The Declaratory Judgment, Edson R. Sunderland
A Modern Evolution In Remedial Rights - The Declaratory Judgment, Edson R. Sunderland
Articles
In early times the basis of jurisdiction is the existence and the constant assertion of physical power over the parties to the action, but as civilization advances the mere existence of such power tends to make its exercise less and less essential. If this is true, it must be because there is something in civilization itself which diminishes the necessity for a resort to actual force in sustaining the judgments of courts. And it is quite clear that civilization does supply an element which is theoretically capable of entirely supplanting the exercise of force in the assertion of jurisdiction. This …