Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (220)
- University of Michigan Law School (34)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (29)
- St. Mary's University (26)
- New York Law School (19)
-
- Pepperdine University (16)
- Brooklyn Law School (12)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (12)
- BLR (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (11)
- University of Georgia School of Law (10)
- Roger Williams University (9)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (9)
- UIC School of Law (7)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (6)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- University of Washington School of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (4)
- Georgia State University College of Law (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- William & Mary Law School (4)
- Winthrop University (4)
- Florida International University College of Law (3)
- Fordham Law School (3)
- Hollins University (3)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Keyword
-
- Remedies (58)
- Constitutional Law (41)
- Constitutional law (25)
- First Amendment (25)
- Constitution (24)
-
- Supreme Court (19)
- Due process (17)
- Fourteenth Amendment (17)
- Damages (14)
- Law (14)
- Due Process (13)
- Courts (12)
- Federalism (11)
- Legislation (11)
- Privacy (11)
- Civil rights (10)
- Discrimination (10)
- Fifth Amendment (10)
- Fourth Amendment (10)
- Torts (10)
- Eighth Amendment (9)
- Immigration (9)
- Regulation (9)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (8)
- Injury (8)
- Judges (8)
- Jurisprudence (8)
- Legal History (8)
- Litigation (8)
- Punitive damages (8)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
- Michigan Law Review (23)
- NYLS Law Review (19)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (18)
-
- Articles (16)
- Pepperdine Law Review (15)
- ExpressO (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Publications (9)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Northwestern University Law Review (7)
- UIC Law Review (7)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (7)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (6)
- Buffalo Law Review (5)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Mitchell Hamline Law Review (5)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- Washington Law Review (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (4)
- Journal of Law and Policy (4)
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Undergraduate Honors Theses (4)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (3)
- Catholic University Law Review (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 391 - 420 of 561
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Constitutional Remedies And Public Interest Balancing, John M. Greabe
Constitutional Remedies And Public Interest Balancing, John M. Greabe
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The conventional account of our remedial tradition recognizes that courts may engage in discretionary public interest balancing to withhold the specific remedies typically administered in equity. But it generally does not acknowledge that courts possess the same power with respect to the substitutionary remedies usually provided at law. The conventional account has things backwards when it comes to constitutional remedies. The modern Supreme Court frequently requires the withholding of substitutionary constitutional relief under doctrines developed to protect the perceived public interest. Yet it has treated specific relief to remedy ongoing or imminent invasions of rights as routine, at least when …
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
The Supreme Court Continues Its Journey Down The Ever Narrowing Paths Of Section 1983 And The Due Process Clause: An Analysis Of Parratt V. Taylor, Robert E. Palmer
Pepperdine Law Review
After nearly a century of quiet slumber, the Supreme Court awoke the sleeping giant. In the past two decades, 42 U.S.C. §1983 has evolved into a judicial Frankenstein monster. Unable to control the beast, the Court has attempted to restrict the creature's movements by unnecessarily limiting its constitutional source. If followed to its logical conclusion, the Court's narrow reading of the Constitution may ultimately demote all due process violations to state tort remedies. This note traces the legislative and judicial evolution of section 1983 as well as the statute's present interaction with the due process clause. The vehicle for this …
In Personam (Criminal) Forfeiture And Federal Drug Felonies: An Expansion Of A Harsh English Tradition Into A Modern Dilemma, William J. Hughes, Edward H. O'Connell Jr.
In Personam (Criminal) Forfeiture And Federal Drug Felonies: An Expansion Of A Harsh English Tradition Into A Modern Dilemma, William J. Hughes, Edward H. O'Connell Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: New Tort Problem For The Mass Media, Robert E. Drechsel
Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: New Tort Problem For The Mass Media, Robert E. Drechsel
Pepperdine Law Review
Negligent infliction of emotional distress is becoming an increasingly popular cause of action to be utilized against media defendants. This article begins by tracing the development of the tort and explaining its central elements through cases involving mass media defendants. It studies the relationship between negligent infliction and the torts of libel, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. After considering the appropriate balance between expression and emotional tranquility, it is concluded that negligent infliction actions present an ominous threat to the free flow of expression. Sound policy considerations, flowing in part from the first amendment, dictate that …
Intramilitary Tort Immunity: A Constitutional Justification , Kevin M. Fillo
Intramilitary Tort Immunity: A Constitutional Justification , Kevin M. Fillo
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Nollan V. California Coastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need, Timothy A. Bittle
Nollan V. California Coastal Commission: You Can't Always Get What You Want, But Sometimes You Get What You Need, Timothy A. Bittle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Kozminski: On The Threshold Of Involuntary Servitude , Kenneth T. Koonce Jr.
United States V. Kozminski: On The Threshold Of Involuntary Servitude , Kenneth T. Koonce Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
States Escape Liability For Copyright Infringement?, Michelle V. Francis
States Escape Liability For Copyright Infringement?, Michelle V. Francis
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Constitutional Restraints On The Doctrine Of Punitive Damages, Theodore B. Olson, Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marching To A Different Drummer: Are Lower Courts Faithfully Implementing The Evolving Due Process Guideposts To Catch And Correct Excessive Punitive Damages Awards, N. Williams Hines
Marching To A Different Drummer: Are Lower Courts Faithfully Implementing The Evolving Due Process Guideposts To Catch And Correct Excessive Punitive Damages Awards, N. Williams Hines
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Civil Wrongs And Rights: Kiyemba V. Obama And The Meaning Of Freedom, Separation Of Powers, And The Rule Of Law Ten Years After 9/11, Katherine L. Vaughns, Heather L. Williams
Of Civil Wrongs And Rights: Kiyemba V. Obama And The Meaning Of Freedom, Separation Of Powers, And The Rule Of Law Ten Years After 9/11, Katherine L. Vaughns, Heather L. Williams
Faculty Scholarship
This article is about the rise and fall of continued adherence to the rule of law, proper application of the separation of powers doctrine, and the meaning of freedom for a group of seventeen Uighurs—a Turkic Muslim ethnic minority whose members reside in the Xinjiang province of China—who had been held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base since 2002. Most scholars regard the trilogy of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, and Boumediene v. Bush as demonstrating the Supreme Court’s willingness to uphold the rule of law during the war on terror. The recent experience of the Uighurs …
Rethinking Principals Of Comparative Fault In Light Of California's Proposition 51, James A. Gash
Rethinking Principals Of Comparative Fault In Light Of California's Proposition 51, James A. Gash
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Big Business Beware: Punitive Damages Do Not Violate Fourteenth Amendment According To Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. V. Haslip, Christopher V. Carlyle
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
United States V. Alvarez-Machain: Kidnapping In The "War On Drugs" - A Matter Of Executive Discretion Or Lawlessness?, Michael G. Mckinnon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Walking The Invisible Line Of Punitive Damages: Txo Production Corp. V. Alliance Resources Corp. , Nancy G. Dragutsky
Walking The Invisible Line Of Punitive Damages: Txo Production Corp. V. Alliance Resources Corp. , Nancy G. Dragutsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Split-Recovery: A Constitutional Answer To The Punitive Damage Dilemma, Clay R. Stevens
Split-Recovery: A Constitutional Answer To The Punitive Damage Dilemma, Clay R. Stevens
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wilson V. Layne: Increasing The Scope Of The Fourth Amendment Right To Privacy, Ashlea Wright
Wilson V. Layne: Increasing The Scope Of The Fourth Amendment Right To Privacy, Ashlea Wright
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Civil Recourse, Damages-As-Redress, And Constitutional Torts, Michael Wells
Civil Recourse, Damages-As-Redress, And Constitutional Torts, Michael Wells
Scholarly Works
In Torts as Wrongs, Professors John Goldberg and Benjamin Zipursky discuss the connection between "tortious wrongdoing" and "civil recourse." Their civil recourse theory "sees tort law as a means for empowering individuals to seek redress against those who have wronged them." Goldberg and Zipursky show that modern tort theory is dominated by "loss allocation," which uses liability and damages as instruments for assigning losses to deter unwanted behavior and to compensate the plaintiff. Under loss allocation, the central principle of damages is full compensation that is, to make the plaintiff whole. The core component of damages, though not the only …
The Confirmation Of Punitive Awards In Arbitration: Did Due Process Disappear?, Stuart M. Boyarsky
The Confirmation Of Punitive Awards In Arbitration: Did Due Process Disappear?, Stuart M. Boyarsky
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
Part I of this article provides a brief overview of the reasoning behind the limited judicial review of an arbitral award. Part II describes the state action doctrine and explains how several courts have used the doctrine in order to apply due process protection to proceedings involving private actors. In particular, this section discusses several significant decisions that involve the issue of whether a court's confirmation of an arbitrator's award of punitive damages creates state action and requires the application of constitutional protections such as due process. This Note concludes that due to a leading decision by the Eleventh Circuit, …
The Ghost That Slayed The Mandate, Kevin C. Walsh
The Ghost That Slayed The Mandate, Kevin C. Walsh
Scholarly Articles
Virginia v. Sebelius is a federal lawsuit in which Virginia has challenged President Obama's signature legislative initiative of health care reform. Virginia has sought declaratory and injunctive relief to vindicate a state statute declaring that no Virginia resident shall be required to buy health insurance. To defend this state law from the preemptive effect of federal law, Virginia has contended that the federal legislation's individual mandate to buy health insurance is unconstitutional. Virginia's lawsuit has been one of the most closely followed and politically salient federal cases in recent times. Yet the very features of the case that have contributed …
The Ghost That Slayed The Mandate, Kevin C. Walsh
The Ghost That Slayed The Mandate, Kevin C. Walsh
Law Faculty Publications
Virginia v. Sebelius is a federal lawsuit in which Virginia has challenged President Obama's signature legislative initiative of health care reform. Virginia has sought declaratory and injunctive relief to vindicate a state statute declaring that no Virginia resident shall be required to buy health insurance. To defend this state law from the preemptive effect of federal law, Virginia has contended that the federal legislation's individual mandate to buy health insurance is unconstitutional. Virginia's lawsuit has been one of the most closely followed and politically salient federal cases in recent times. Yet the very features of the case that have contributed …
Chinese Use Of Administrative Proceedings To Enforce Intellectual Property Rights: Evaluating And Improving Adr In China, Simeng Han
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Since its entry into the World Trade Organization ("WTO") in 2001, China has significantly reformed its legal system in order to enforce its commitment to protecting Intellectual Property ("IP"). Yet, there remains a lingering suspicion of the actual level of Chinese commitment-as indicated by continuous infringement claims from nations such as the United States. With an increasing number of disputes loading the court dockets and putting pressure on judges, and given China's "deep-rooted historical preference for informal and non-adversarial means of dispute resolution," there is enormous potential for further development of ADR in this field. Indeed, the culturally preferable way …
Public-Private Approaches To Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts On The Gulf Coast Claims Facility, Myriam E. Gilles
Public-Private Approaches To Mass Tort Victim Compensation: Some Thoughts On The Gulf Coast Claims Facility, Myriam E. Gilles
Articles
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Reporter And Advisers To Restatement (Third) Restitution And Unjust Enrichment, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent: First American Financial Corp. V. Edwards, Doug Rendleman, Douglas Laycock
Brief Of Reporter And Advisers To Restatement (Third) Restitution And Unjust Enrichment, As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondent: First American Financial Corp. V. Edwards, Doug Rendleman, Douglas Laycock
Scholarly Articles
Restitution may be a casualty in a collision with the constitutional law of standing. Article III is traditionally said to require an “injury in fact” for standing to be a plaintiff in federal court. Edwards, who alleges that First American paid a bribe or kickback in violation of the federal Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, seeks to recover the statutory penalty. Defendant argues that even if it violated the Act, Edwards suffered no “injury in fact.” Our amicus brief in support of Edwards alerts the Supreme Court to the many restitutionary claims either for a wrongdoer’s profits or to set …
Fulfilling The Copyright Social Justice Promise: Digitizing Textual Information, Lateef Mtima, Steven D. Jamar
Fulfilling The Copyright Social Justice Promise: Digitizing Textual Information, Lateef Mtima, Steven D. Jamar
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Orphan Works And The Google Book Search Settlement: An International Perspective, Bernard Lang
Orphan Works And The Google Book Search Settlement: An International Perspective, Bernard Lang
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Media, The Jury, And The High-Profile Defendant: A Defense Perspective On The Media Circus, John C. Meringolo
The Media, The Jury, And The High-Profile Defendant: A Defense Perspective On The Media Circus, John C. Meringolo
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Finding Home In The World: A Deontological Theory Of The Right To Be Adopted, Paulo Barrozo
Finding Home In The World: A Deontological Theory Of The Right To Be Adopted, Paulo Barrozo
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fictionalized Criminal Law And Youth Legal Consciousness, Avi Brisman
Fictionalized Criminal Law And Youth Legal Consciousness, Avi Brisman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
American Academy Of Religion V. Napolitano, Margaret Laufman
American Academy Of Religion V. Napolitano, Margaret Laufman
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.