Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court advocacy (14)
- First Supreme Court arguments (11)
- Appellate court (2)
- Judges (2)
- Legal profession (2)
-
- Oral argument (2)
- 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 (1)
- Alternatives (1)
- Answer (1)
- Answering (1)
- Appeals (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Appellate advocacy (1)
- Appellate brief (1)
- Appellate expectations (1)
- Appellate judges (1)
- Baliles v. Virginia Hospital Association (1)
- Bronston v. United States (1)
- Case briefs (1)
- Central Machinery Company v. Arizona State Tax Commission (1)
- Certiorari (1)
- Civility (1)
- Conduct (1)
- Constitution (1)
- County of Riverside v. McLaughlin (1)
- Court opinion (1)
- Courts (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Demeanor (1)
- Dissent (1)
Articles 1 - 20 of 20
Full-Text Articles in Legal Profession
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
May It Please The Court–Or Not: Appellate Judges' Preferences And Pet Peeves About Oral Argument, Margaret D. Mcgaughey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
Narratives Of Self-Government In Making The Case, Benjamin L. Berger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
Infrequently Asked Questions, Edward T. Swaine
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
If appellate advocates could hear from courts about topics that might be raised during oral argument—as opposed to relying solely on their ability to anticipate the issues—might their answers be better? That seems likely, but it is unlikely that research could confirm that, as judicial practice overwhelmingly favors impromptu questioning. Spontaneity may be harmless if the question was predictable, or unavoidable if a judge just thought of the question. But sometimes advocates have to answer challenging questions concerning the law, facts, or implications of a position—questions that help decide the case, either due to the quality of the answer or …
Experience Matters: The Rise Of A Supreme Court Bar And Its Effect On Certiorari, Joseph W. Swanson
Experience Matters: The Rise Of A Supreme Court Bar And Its Effect On Certiorari, Joseph W. Swanson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Reflections On Appellate Courts: An Appellate Advocate's Thoughts For Judges, Mary Massaron Ross
Reflections On Appellate Courts: An Appellate Advocate's Thoughts For Judges, Mary Massaron Ross
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Avoiding Missteps In The Supreme Court: A Guide To Resources For Counsel, Charles A. Rothfeld
Avoiding Missteps In The Supreme Court: A Guide To Resources For Counsel, Charles A. Rothfeld
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Words To The Wise: David C. Frederick's Supreme Court And Appellate Advocacy, Mark R. Kravitz
Words To The Wise: David C. Frederick's Supreme Court And Appellate Advocacy, Mark R. Kravitz
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
A First Argument In The Tradition Of Many, Beth S. Brinkmann
A First Argument In The Tradition Of Many, Beth S. Brinkmann
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
First Argument In The United States Supreme Court, Talbot D'Alemberte
First Argument In The United States Supreme Court, Talbot D'Alemberte
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Why Me?, Walter Dellinger
Why Me?, Walter Dellinger
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
I Couldn't Wait To Argue, Timothy Coates
I Couldn't Wait To Argue, Timothy Coates
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Learning (And Teaching) From Doing, Edward B. Foley
Learning (And Teaching) From Doing, Edward B. Foley
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Still Grateful After All These Years, Christina M. Tchen
Still Grateful After All These Years, Christina M. Tchen
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Tilting At Windmills, Andrew L. Frey
Tilting At Windmills, Andrew L. Frey
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
First Argument Impressions Of The Supreme Court, Stuart M. Riback
First Argument Impressions Of The Supreme Court, Stuart M. Riback
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Public Rights, Private Rites: Reliving Richmond Newspapers For My Father, Laurence H. Tribe
Public Rights, Private Rites: Reliving Richmond Newspapers For My Father, Laurence H. Tribe
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Once Is Not Enough, Or How About Arguing Your First Two Supreme Court Cases Back To Back . . . And Losing?, Ian A. Macpherson
Once Is Not Enough, Or How About Arguing Your First Two Supreme Court Cases Back To Back . . . And Losing?, Ian A. Macpherson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Advocacy Before The United States Supreme Court, Robert H. Jackson
Advocacy Before The United States Supreme Court, Robert H. Jackson
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
Twice Grilled, J. Thomas Sullivan
Twice Grilled, J. Thomas Sullivan
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
No abstract provided.
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
From Webster To Word-Processing: The Ascendance Of The Appellate Brief, William H. Rehnquist
The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process
Chief Justice William Rehnquist analyzed the evolution of Supreme Court advocacy. The discussion begins with the initial preference for oral arguments and the influence of nineteenth century Supreme Court advocate Daniel Webster. The discussion then turns to the Court’s shift from more attention to oral argument to written briefs.