Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (33)
- Legislation (19)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- Criminal Law (14)
- Courts (13)
-
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (12)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Law and Race (11)
- Education (10)
- Higher Education (10)
- Law and Society (10)
- Human Rights Law (9)
- International Law (9)
- State and Local Government Law (9)
- Supreme Court of the United States (9)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Litigation (8)
- First Amendment (6)
- Legal Writing and Research (6)
- President/Executive Department (6)
- Judges (5)
- Civil Law (4)
- Law and Politics (4)
- Religion Law (4)
- Arts and Humanities (3)
- Commercial Law (3)
- Common Law (3)
- Institution
-
- UIC School of Law (22)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (12)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (11)
- University of Georgia School of Law (9)
- University of Michigan Law School (9)
-
- Cornell University Law School (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- University of Richmond (5)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (4)
- University of Miami Law School (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Emory University School of Law (1)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (1)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal history (10)
- History (8)
- Civil Society (7)
- Constitution (7)
- Constitutional law (6)
-
- Political philosophy (5)
- Democracy (4)
- Comparative law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- 18th Century Scotland (2)
- Associations and institutions (2)
- Canada (2)
- Citizenship (2)
- Colorblindness (2)
- Congress (2)
- Critical race theory (2)
- Democratic and Constitutional Theory (2)
- Discrimination (2)
- Economics (2)
- Establishment clause (2)
- Family (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Gerrymandering (2)
- Hasidic Public Schools (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Immigration (2)
- Individualism as Principle (2)
- International Law: History (2)
- James Madison (2)
- James Wilson (2)
- Publication
-
- UIC Law Review (21)
- Indiana Law Journal (11)
- The Opinion Newspaper (all issues) (10)
- Articles (9)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (7)
-
- Publications (7)
- LLM Theses and Essays (5)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (5)
- Journal Articles (4)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Maryland Law Review (3)
- Michigan Law Review (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Dalhousie Law Journal (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Book Reviews (1)
- Books (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- Contributions to Books (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Articles and Other Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 90 of 132
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Race-Based Jury Nullification: Case-In-Chief, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 911 (1997), Paul D. Butler
Race-Based Jury Nullification: Case-In-Chief, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 911 (1997), Paul D. Butler
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Analysis Of People, For Michigan Republic, Ex Rel V. State Of Michigan, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (1997), Phillip A. Hendges
An Analysis Of People, For Michigan Republic, Ex Rel V. State Of Michigan, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 937 (1997), Phillip A. Hendges
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
This Is Who Will Die When Doctors Are Allowed To Kill Their Patients, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 95 (1997), Michael Mcgonnigal
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States, Puerto Rico, And The Territorial Incorporation Doctrine: Reaching A Century Of Constitutional Authoritarianism, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 55 (1997), Gabriel A. Terrasa
United States, Puerto Rico, And The Territorial Incorporation Doctrine: Reaching A Century Of Constitutional Authoritarianism, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 55 (1997), Gabriel A. Terrasa
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Paperwork Redux: The (Stronger) Paperwork Reduction Act Of 1995, Jeffrey Lubbers
Paperwork Redux: The (Stronger) Paperwork Reduction Act Of 1995, Jeffrey Lubbers
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Factional Foundations Of Competition Policy In America 1888-1992, James May
The Factional Foundations Of Competition Policy In America 1888-1992, James May
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Accountability For Past Abuses, Juan E. Mendez
Accountability For Past Abuses, Juan E. Mendez
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Review Of Reason And Rhetoric In The Philosophy Of Hobbes, Donald J. Herzog
Review Of Reason And Rhetoric In The Philosophy Of Hobbes, Donald J. Herzog
Reviews
In the 1960s, Quentin Skinner wrote a series of polemical if terse papers arguing that the conventional approach to the history of political theory was confused. Using Hobbes as something of a vehicle for his position, Skinner enunciated what is now well known as the "Cambridge" approach to political theory. He urged that we situate authors in their intellectual contexts so that we can isolate what is distinctive, perhaps subversive, in their use of language: only then, he argued, can we have any valid historical understanding on what they are doing in writing these weird books in the first place. …
Official Imaginations: Globalization, Difference, And State-Sponsored Immigration Discourses, Kunal M. Parker
Official Imaginations: Globalization, Difference, And State-Sponsored Immigration Discourses, Kunal M. Parker
Articles
No abstract provided.
Methodological Interventions And The Slavery Cases; Or, Night-Thoughts Of A Legal Realist, Louise Weinberg
Methodological Interventions And The Slavery Cases; Or, Night-Thoughts Of A Legal Realist, Louise Weinberg
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On A Quarter-Century Of Constitutional Regulation Of Capital Punishment, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 399 (1997), Joseph Bessetre, Stephen Bright, George Kendall, William Kunkle, Carol Steiker, Jordan Steiker
Reflections On A Quarter-Century Of Constitutional Regulation Of Capital Punishment, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 399 (1997), Joseph Bessetre, Stephen Bright, George Kendall, William Kunkle, Carol Steiker, Jordan Steiker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gacy V. Dahmer: An Informed Response, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 331 (1997), William J. Kunkle Jr.
Gacy V. Dahmer: An Informed Response, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 331 (1997), William J. Kunkle Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Virulence Of The National Appetite For Bogus Revelation, Kermit L. Hall
The Virulence Of The National Appetite For Bogus Revelation, Kermit L. Hall
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
On Death And Dworkin: A Critique Of His Theory Of Inviolability, Richard Stith
On Death And Dworkin: A Critique Of His Theory Of Inviolability, Richard Stith
Maryland Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law Of Arbitration, Theodore J. St. Antoine
The Law Of Arbitration, Theodore J. St. Antoine
Book Chapters
The law did not look kindly on arbitration in its infancy. As a process by which two or more parties could agree to have an impartial outsider resolve a dispute between them, arbitration was seen as a usurpation of the judiciary' sown functions, as an attempt to "oust the courts of jurisdiction." That was the English view, and American courts were similarly hostile. They would not order specific performance of an executory (unperformed) agreement to arbitrate, nor grant more than nominal damages for the usual breach. Only an arbitral award actually issued was enforceable at common law. All this began …
Anasazi Jurisprudence, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Justice George Sutherland And Economic Liberty: Constitutional Conservatism And The Problem Of Factions, 6 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
Justice George Sutherland And Economic Liberty: Constitutional Conservatism And The Problem Of Factions, 6 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 1 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
Most scholars have viewed Justice George Sutherland as a conservative jurist who opposed government regulation because of his adherence to laissez-faire economics and Social Darwinism, or because of his devotion to natural rights. In this Article, Professor Olken analyzes these widely held misperceptions of Justice Sutherland's economic liberty jurisprudence, which was based not on socio-economic theory, but on historical experience and common law. Justice Sutherland, consistent with the judicial conservatism of the Lochner era, wanted to protect individual rights from the whims of political factions and changing democratic majorities. The Lochner era differentiation between government regulations enacted for the public …
Thomas Jefferson And Bolling V Bolling, Richard B. Bernstein
Thomas Jefferson And Bolling V Bolling, Richard B. Bernstein
Books
The manuscript account of the arguments in the case of Bolling v Bolling, chiefly in the hand of Thomas Jefferson, has been published for the first time in this book. The manuscript, which is now in the collection of the Henry E Huntington Library, contains the most complete known account of arguments submitted to an American colonial court. The book's introduction to the court case places it into its proper context.
Hearsay Evidence: A Comparison Of Two Jurisdictions: United States And Nigeria, Lawrence Okechukwu Azubuike
Hearsay Evidence: A Comparison Of Two Jurisdictions: United States And Nigeria, Lawrence Okechukwu Azubuike
LLM Theses and Essays
Many jurisdictions have detailed rules of evidence which regulate the facts that are admissible in court. The hearsay rule is one such rule which excludes certain evidence. The hearsay rule has roots in an old common law principle and is featured in many jurisdictions today, but has endured heavy criticisms over time. This paper examines the application of the hearsay rule in the United States and in Nigeria. Both are common law countries, however, the United States’ legal system is more advanced than that of Nigeria. This comparison aims to inform and assist current reform efforts in Nigeria.
Hiram F. Stevens And The Founding Of The St. Paul College Of Law, Douglas R. Heidenreich
Hiram F. Stevens And The Founding Of The St. Paul College Of Law, Douglas R. Heidenreich
Faculty Scholarship
The St. Paul College of Law, one of William Mitchell College of Law's predecessor institutions, was established by five attorneys in 1900. Especially prominent among these attorneys was Hiram F. Stevens (1852-1904), who served as the first dean and was also a legislator, teacher, scholar, popular orator, and a founding member of the American Bar Association.
In Sisterhood, Lisa C. Ikemoto
In Sisterhood, Lisa C. Ikemoto
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
A review of Where Is Your Body? by Mari Matsuda
Death Penalty: A Philosophical And Theological Perspective, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (1997), Walter Berns, Nancy Bothne, William Bowers, Richard Dieter, Richard Land, James Lund, Austin Sarat
Death Penalty: A Philosophical And Theological Perspective, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 463 (1997), Walter Berns, Nancy Bothne, William Bowers, Richard Dieter, Richard Land, James Lund, Austin Sarat
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Verdict Interviews: The Key To Understanding The Decision Behind The Verdict, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (1997), Christine J. Iversen
Post-Verdict Interviews: The Key To Understanding The Decision Behind The Verdict, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 507 (1997), Christine J. Iversen
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Sixth Amendment: Protecting Defendants' Rights At The Expense Of Child Victims, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (1997), Julie A. Anderson
The Sixth Amendment: Protecting Defendants' Rights At The Expense Of Child Victims, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 767 (1997), Julie A. Anderson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Gospel Of Law, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1039 (1997), Kevin L. Hopkins
A Gospel Of Law, 30 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1039 (1997), Kevin L. Hopkins
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall In Historical Perspective, 31 J. Marshall L. Rev. 137 (1997), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
History Of The Court Reporter In The Appellate Courts Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
History Of The Court Reporter In The Appellate Courts Of Pennsylvania, Joel Fishman
Law Faculty Publications
States have traditionally published the decisions of their intermediate and highest courts.1 Legal historians, in recent years, have written extensively on the history of court reporting and court reports.2 These historical accounts have revealed that many famous judges and lawyers throughout the country gained prominent reputations stemming from the publishing of their decisions.3 In the "nineteenth century, the development of court reports received attention from the legal community through reviews in many of the leading periodicals of the day."4 By 1900, however, the periodical literature contained only a small number of reviews of individual state reports. …
Out Yet Unseen: A Racial Critique Of Gay And Lesbian Legal Theory And Political Discourse, Darren Lenard Hutchinson
Out Yet Unseen: A Racial Critique Of Gay And Lesbian Legal Theory And Political Discourse, Darren Lenard Hutchinson
UF Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Dutch Uncle Sam: Immigration Reform And Notions Of Family, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Dutch Uncle Sam: Immigration Reform And Notions Of Family, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Publications
No abstract provided.
Who’S Afraid Of Humpty Dumpty: Deconstructionist References In Judicial Opinions, Madeleine M. Plasencia
Who’S Afraid Of Humpty Dumpty: Deconstructionist References In Judicial Opinions, Madeleine M. Plasencia
Articles
This Article examines the treatment of deconstruction in United States judicial opinions.' A handful of cases have directly referred to the French philosopher and literary theorist, Jacques Derrida.2 In each of these cases, the court has rejected Derrida's philosophy, apparently out of a fear that recognition of any legitimacy of Derrida's thoughts would lead to the self-destruction of the legal world. These courts have misunderstood that consideration or recognition of Derrida's philosophy in the legal context would not unavoidably lead to the end of all meaningful legal discourse in the United States. A discussion of these cases will serve as …