Legal History Commons^™

Carl Schmitt And His Influence On Historians, Reinhard Mehring

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Schmitt, History, And Habermas: Comments On Mehring And Rasch, Joseph W. Bendersky

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Human Dignity: From Antiquity To Modern Israel's Constitutional Framework, Izhak Englard

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction, Andreas Kalyvas, Jan Müller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Cardozo And The Art Of Biography, Andrew L. Kaufman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Strategy For The State Museum Of Auschwitz-Birkenau, Robert Jan Van Pelt, Donald Mckay, Valerio Rynnimeri, Dereck Revington, Debórah Dwork

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Conference On Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Israel Miller

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Why Now?, Israel Singer

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The U.S. Government And The Wartime Neutrals: History And Justice After Half A Century, Bennett Freeman

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Politics Of A Strategy For Auschwitz-Birkenau, Debórah Dwork, Robert Jan Van Pelt

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Peaceful Transitions To Constitutional Democracy: Transcript Of The Proceedings

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Pentagon Papers - Victory For A Free Press, William R. Glendon

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justices At Work: An Introduction, Michel Rosenfeld

Cardozo Law Review

"Justices at Work," a day long conference which took place on September 19, 1995 at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, brought together Justices and constitutional scholars from seven different countries to consider a hypothetical constitutional case dealing with fundamental rights. This issue of the Law Review includes the facts of the hypothetical case, the applicable hypothetical statute, the briefs submitted to the International Moot Courtall of which were the product of a collaborative effort among the seven scholars involved-as well as a transcript of the proceedings and of the deliberations of the seven Justices: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg …

Roman Slave Law: An Anglo-American Perspective, Alan Watson

Cardozo Law Review

The most influential secular system of law in the West has been Roman private law. This is true even of its slave law, which was received not only in states of Europe where slavery survived, but also in European colonies in America, whether those of Spain, Portugal, France, or the Dutch West India Company. Though slavery had died out in France and the Dutch Republic, when slavery appeared in the colonies, recourse was had above all to Roman law.

The First Slave (And Why He Matters), Jonathan A. Bush

Cardozo Law Review

This Article has two purposes. The narrower, straight historical purpose is to explore in further detail the status of blacks in the earliest years of Britain's colonies in the New World. The second, more legal aim is to explore what is, for many of us, still the hardest question in American legal history: namely, to understand the route by which slavery came to be legal in the early seventeenth century, in a culture that had long rejected unfree status and that seemed to retain that view.

Gender In The Law Of Slavery In The Antebellum United States, Andrew T. Fede

Cardozo Law Review

In her thought-provoking paper Finding Sojourner's Truth: Race, Gender, and the Institution of Property, Cheryl I. Harris explores the connections between slavery, race, and gender in the law of the antebellum United States. Harris acknowledges that slaves alone were defined as property at law, and, therefore,*the legal status of slaves differed from free white women and free black women. She also acknowledges that "white women" were allowed property rights on "male-defined terms" but asserts, nevertheless, that free women could be considered as a form of property.

Comment On Hans Baade’S The Gens De Couleur Of Louisiana: Comparative Slave Law In Microcosm, Morris S. Arnold

Cardozo Law Review

Hans Baade invented colonial Louisiana legal history. Before he started doing research in the eighteenth-century records in New Orleans and elsewhere, virtually no serious historical work involving the judicial and notarial archives of colonial Louisiana had ever been done. Professor Baade also undertook years ago to trace the various French and Spanish statutory enactments that bore on Louisiana legal history, and this proved to be a virtually impenetrable mare's nest. Before Professor Baade began his work, most of what had been written about Louisiana's colonial legal past was both amateurish and antiquated. It should therefore come as no surprise that …

Abolitionist Feminism, Moral Slavery, And The Constitution: “On The Same Platform Of Human Rights”, David A.J. Richards

Cardozo Law Review

The analogy between race and gender plays an increasingly important role in the interpretation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. However, interpretive arguments about the analogy make little or no reference to the abolitionist historical background of the Reconstruction Amendments in general and the Fourteenth Amendment in particular. This might make some sense if the only legitimate interpretive appeal to history were Raoul Berger's version of originalism, namely, the specific denoted things (including persons and practices) to which the relevant drafters and ratifiers of the pertinent constitutional text would or would not have applied the language in …

Finding Sojourner’S Truth: Race, Gender, And The Institution Of Property, Cheryl I. Harris

Cardozo Law Review

This Article begins with the signature speech of Sojourner Truth, one of a handful of Black women of the nineteenth century who became an important figure in the abolitionist movement, a national figure in her own time, and an icon of both historical and contemporary feminism. As the emblematic Black woman of her time and as a Black woman that both suffered under and transcended slavery, Sojourner Truth was and is a critically situated subject through which to examine the crosscutting constructions of race and gender forged under slavery.

Comment On The First Slave (And Why He Matters) By Jonathan Bush, Peter Kolchin

Cardozo Law Review

In his Article The First Slave (And Why He Matters), Professor Jonathan Bush returns to a persistent question in the history of the colonial Chesapeake: the status of blacks in the seventeenth century. He frames this question, however, in a new way. Rather than seeking to determine whether or not blacks were slaves before the codification of slave law-a largely unanswerable question that revolves, at least in part, around what one means by "slaves"-he asks, how could the English have imposed slavery on blacks in America when slavery was non-existent in England and under English law? In response, he …

“So Tall Within” - The Legacy Of Sojourner Truth, Peggy Cooper Davis

Cardozo Law Review

I take my text from Professor Harris's rich discussion of Sojourner Truth's life narrative. I begin, as Professor Harris began, with Truth's assertion of parental right. When her five-year-old son, Peter, was sent by his owner from New York to Alabama, Truth agonized over the loss of contact between herself and her child. She feared that Peter would lose the opportunity, owed to him under New York law, of liberation at the age of twenty-one. Truth's insistent cry, "I'll have my child again," was initially dismissed by incredulous slaveholders. But it became a theme of struggle as she repeatedly walked …

Hegel’S Slaves, Blackstone’S Objects, And Hohfeld’S Ghosts: A Comment On Thomas Russell’S Imagery Of Slave Auctions, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Cardozo Law Review

Thomas Russell's wonderful paper A New Image of the Slave Auction is an example of how the best empirical work can result in conclusions that are so obviously "right" that they risk being mistaken as obvious. His paper serves as an important warning against a recurring problem in legal, as well as other scholarship: Picture thinking-in the sense of an unconscious (and as a result, unquestioning and uncritical) acceptance of familiar, traditional, comfortable imagery-so often blinds us.

Property, Parenthood, And Peonage: Reflections On The Return To Status Quo Antebellum, Margaret A. Burnham

Cardozo Law Review

Cheryl Harris demonstrates how intertwining racial and gender boundaries, whose shadows are long, longstanding, and ominous, were initially constructed around the legal principle of human chattel as personal property. She insightfully argues that slavery inextricably linked the concepts of race and property in the American legal imagination; that property originates from rules that are "racially coded" and determined. Cheryl Harris's contribution to this Symposium is a continuation of her project of illuminating how law ratifies and implements a racialized conception of property. This comment considers the application of Professor Harris's argument, that property, in the context of race-based slavery, is …

What’S Pragmatic About Legal Pragmatism?, David Luban

Cardozo Law Review

Does legal pragmatism have anything at all to do with pragmatism? Both Thomas Grey and Richard Posner seem to suggest that in important respects the answer is no. Grey tells us that even a devout anti-pragmatist in matters ontological can endorse legal pragmatism, while Posner adds the converse, that pragmatic philosophy may at times impel a judge to decide cases like a formalist. These conclusions suggest that talk of legal pragmatism may simply be a pun on what philosophers take pragmatism to be. Lest this appear a far-fetched suggestion, remember that in philosophy the word "realism" often refers to the …

The Unlikely Hero Of Dred Scott: Benjamin Robbins Curtis And The Constitutional Law Of Slavery, Earl M. Maltz

Cardozo Law Review

The standard account portrays Dred Scott v. Sandford as a story of villains and heroes. The villains are the members of the majority, led by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, who concluded that descendants of slaves could never become citizens of the Union and that Congress could not outlaw slavery in the territories. The heroes, on the other hand, are the two dissenters, John McLean and Benjamin Robbins Curtis, who rejected these conclusions and determined that Scott should be deemed a free man. McLean's opinion, however, was not tightly reasoned and was rather clearly designed to advance his presidential ambitions; …

Comment On Earl Maltz, Kenneth M. Stampp

Cardozo Law Review

Professor Earl Maltz has written an excellent brief account of Benjamin R. Curtis's judicial record as it relates to slavery, including his dissenting argument in the famous Dred Scott case. He found Curtis to be a perfect example of mid-nineteenth century Northern conservative Whigs-the "Cotton Whigs," as their antislavery critics called them. They disliked slavery, but, in equal measure, they disliked those who agitated against it. Both Southern proslavery extremists and Northern abolitionists appalled them, for both groups endangered the Union. Conservative Whig President Millard Fillmore would not have appointed Curtis to the Supreme Court if he had shared the …

The Slavery Of Emancipation, Guyora Binder

Cardozo Law Review

The Thirteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution commands that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist." What has been the effect of this command?

It will serve my present purpose to offer the following toosimple answer to this complex question: the Thirteenth Amendment secured little more than the manumission of slaves already practically freed by the friction of war. It guaranteed, in Confederate General Robert Richardson's now well-known phrase, "nothing but freedom."

Supposing this answer to be true, a further question presents itself: Did the Thirteenth Amendment's effect fulfill its command? Did universal manumission abolish slavery?

A full answer to …

Bondage, Freedom & The Constitution, Eric Foner

Cardozo Law Review

Linking the papers on this most interesting panel are questions that center on the meaning of freedom. What is freedom? Who has the power to define what freedom is? What are the consequences of slavery and its abolition for Americans' understandings of freedom? In one way or another, these papers, as well as many others in this conference, illuminate these questions.

From Slaves To Citizens: African-Americans, Rights Consciousness, And Reconstruction, Donald G. Nieman

Cardozo Law Review

Addressing a racially mixed jury selected to try Ku Klux Klansmen in federal circuit court in Columbia, South Carolina in 1871, United States Attorney Daniel T. Corbin highlighted the dramatic changes that the previous decade had witnessed. "Gentlemen," he remarked, "we have lived over a century in the last ten years." Corbin did not exaggerate. The Civil War and Reconstruction years witnessed changes as revolutionary as any the nation has ever experienced. And nowhere were the changes as sweeping as in the realm of constitutional law.

Comment On Donald Nieman's Paper, Randall Kennedy

Cardozo Law Review

I have two responses to Professor Neiman's paper. One emphasizes a point he makes. The other disagrees a bit with his reading of the promise of Reconstruction.