Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (259)
- University of Michigan Law School (230)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (102)
- University of Colorado Law School (97)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (93)
- Georgetown University Law Center (74)
- BLR (62)
- American University Washington College of Law (50)
- Duke Law (45)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (45)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (40)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (36)
- Notre Dame Law School (36)
- William & Mary Law School (36)
- New York Law School (35)
- Fordham Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- Boston University School of Law (33)
- University of Richmond (32)
- Brooklyn Law School (31)
- University of Georgia School of Law (31)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (30)
- Columbia Law School (29)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (29)
- Cornell University Law School (28)
- Liberty University (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (26)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (21)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (229)
- Constitutional law (193)
- Constitutional Law (192)
- Legal History (158)
- History (120)
-
- Legal history (109)
- Supreme Court (102)
- Originalism (94)
- Constitutional history (71)
- Jurisprudence (70)
- Constitutional interpretation (68)
- United States Supreme Court (63)
- Federalism (61)
- Congress (58)
- First Amendment (52)
- Fourteenth Amendment (51)
- Judicial review (46)
- Law (44)
- Courts (41)
- Legislation (40)
- Separation of powers (38)
- United States (38)
- Judges (37)
- Due process (36)
- Law and Society (34)
- Slavery (33)
- Politics (30)
- Constitutional theory (28)
- Democracy (28)
- Fifth Amendment (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (225)
- Faculty Scholarship (192)
- Michigan Law Review (161)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (94)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (71)
- Cardozo Law Review (61)
- ExpressO (60)
- Publications (58)
- Articles (56)
- NYLS Law Review (30)
- Faculty Publications (29)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (27)
- Scholarly Works (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Law Faculty Publications (26)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (25)
- Journal Articles (24)
- Touro Law Review (24)
- Indiana Law Journal (21)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (20)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Northwestern University Law Review (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- All Faculty Scholarship (16)
- American University Law Review (16)
- Arkansas Law Review (16)
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1651 - 1680 of 2189
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
Chief Justice John Marshall And The Course Of American Constitutional History, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 743 (2000), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
Classical Legal Naturalism And The Politics Of John Marshall's Constitutional Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 935 (2000), Robert Lowry Clinton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
Editing Marshall, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 823 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
Text And Principle In John Marshall's Constitutional Law: The Cases Of Marbury And Mcculloch, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 973 (2000), Sylvia Snowiss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
John Marshall, Mcculloch V. Maryland, And The Southern States' Rights Tradition, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 875 (2000), R. Kent Newmyer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
Recovering The World Of The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 781 (2000), G. Edward White
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
John Marshall In Spencer Roane's Virginia: The Southern Constitutional Opposition To The Marshall Court, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1131 (2000), F. Thornton Miller
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comments On Clinton: Reconsidering The Role Of Natural Law In John Marshall's Jurisprudence, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1141 (2000), James W. Ely
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
Rebalancing Professor Ely's Reappraisal Of The Marshall Court And Property Rights, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1165 (2000), Stephen A. Siegel
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
Marbury, Mcculloch, Gore And Bush: A Comment On Sylvia Snowiss, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1157 (2000), Stephen B. Presser
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
Property Rights In John Marshall's Virginia: The Case Of Crenshaw And Crenshaw V. Slate River Company, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1175 (2000), J. Gordon Hylton
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
John Marshall And Indian Nations In The Beginning And Now, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1183 (2000), Milner S. Ball
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
The Marshall Court And Property Rights: A Reappraisal, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1023 (2000), James W. Ely Jr.
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
Judicial Institutions In Emerging Federal Systems: The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1063 (2000), Herbert A. Johnson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
Marshall Misconstrued: Activist? Partisan? Reactionary?, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1109 (2000), Jean Edward Smith
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Review, Inherent Rights, The Written Constitution, And Popular Sovereignty: The Founders' Understanding, Richard Kay
Review, Inherent Rights, The Written Constitution, And Popular Sovereignty: The Founders' Understanding, Richard Kay
Faculty Articles and Papers
Reviewing Thomas B. McAffee, Inherent Rights, the Written Constitution, and Popular Sovereignty: The Founders' Understanding. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 2000
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
The Marshall Court And The European Court Of Justice, 33 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1197 (2000), Charles F. Hobson
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
When Should Rights "Trump"? An Examination Of Speech And Property, Laura S. Underkuffler
When Should Rights "Trump"? An Examination Of Speech And Property, Laura S. Underkuffler
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
On The Evolution Of The Canonical Dissent, Anita S. Krishnakumar
On The Evolution Of The Canonical Dissent, Anita S. Krishnakumar
Faculty Publications
Legal theorists increasingly have come to recognize and study the existence of a constitutional canon composed of highly authoritative legal texts that command special reverence in the law. Among these highly authoritative texts are a series of dissenting opinions—e.g., Justice Holmes's in Lochner v. New York, and Justice Harlan's in Plessy v. Ferguson—that ironically are more famous than the majority opinions in most other cases. This Article examines the evolution of the dissenting canon, seeking to explain both the methods by which various dissenting opinions became canonized and the motivating factors behind these canonizations.
Specifically, the Article argues that the …
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Constitutional Federalism, Individual Liberty, And The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act Of 1998, Adam C. Pritchard
Articles
This Article proceeds in four parts. Part I provides background on the historical development of constitutional federalism, the Supreme Court's decisions in this area, and the apparent demise of constitutional limits on federal power. Part II then reviews the Court's revival of constitutional federalism over the last decade. Based on this review, I argue that the Supreme Court's current federalism doctrine can be understood as a "constrained libertarianism" that attempts to use constitutional structure as a check on government interference with individual liberty. In this model, states are respected in our constitutional system because of the counterbalance that they provide …
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
Cracking The Foundational Myths: Independence, Autonomy, And Self-Sufficiency, Martha Albertson Fineman
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
Foreward, Adrienne D. Davis, Joan C. Williams
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
Cracking Foundations As Feminist Method , Katharine T. Bartlett
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
The Riddle Of Harmless Error In Michigan, Elizabeth Price Foley, Robert M. Filiatrault
The Riddle Of Harmless Error In Michigan, Elizabeth Price Foley, Robert M. Filiatrault
Faculty Publications
Examines the harmless error rule as interpreted by Michigan case law.
Are There Nothing But Texts In This Class? Interpreting The Interpretive Turns In Legal Thought, Robin West
Are There Nothing But Texts In This Class? Interpreting The Interpretive Turns In Legal Thought, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Allan Hutchinson remarks at the beginning of his interesting article that Gadamer's writings have had only a peripheral influence on legal scholarship -- only occasionally cited, and then begrudgingly so, and never given the serious attention they deserve or require. Nevertheless, Hutchinson acknowledges, Gadamerian influences can be noted -- particularly in the now widely shared understanding that adjudication is, fundamentally, an interpretive exercise. Even with this qualification, though, I think Hutchinson understates Gadamer's impact. Whatever may be true of Gadamer's influence in other disciplines, his influence in law has been unambiguously both broad and deep -- although it has come …
Recovering The Original Fourth Amendment, Thomas Y. Davies
Recovering The Original Fourth Amendment, Thomas Y. Davies
Michigan Law Review
Claims regarding the original or intended meaning of constitutional texts are commonplace in constitutional argument and analysis. All such claims are subject to an implicit validity criterion - only historically authentic assertions should matter. The rub is that the original meaning commonly attributed to a constitutional text may not be authentic. The historical Fourth Amendment is a case in point. If American judges, lawyers, or law teachers were asked what the Framers intended when they adopted the Fourth Amendment, they would likely answer that the Framers intended that all searches and seizures conducted by government officers must be reasonable given …
The Strange History Of "All Men Are Created Equal", Pauline Maier
The Strange History Of "All Men Are Created Equal", Pauline Maier
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.