Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Selected Works (12)
- New York Law School (10)
- Georgetown University Law Center (7)
- Pepperdine University (6)
- Fordham Law School (4)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (4)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (4)
- Liberty University (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- University of Baltimore Law (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Claremont Colleges (2)
- Duke Law (2)
- Emory University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Duquesne University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- La Salle University (1)
- Macalester College (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (1)
- Trinity College (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- NYLS Law Review (9)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- All Faculty Scholarship (4)
-
- Articles (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- Arkansas Law Review (2)
- CMC Senior Theses (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Honors Theses (2)
- Law Faculty Publications (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (1)
- American University Law Review (1)
- Articles & Chapters (1)
- Barry Cushman (1)
- Book Chapters (1)
- Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects (1)
- Charles W. Murdock (1)
- David S. Bogen (1)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (1)
- FIU Law Review (1)
- Gerard V. Bradley (1)
- Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law Review (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- James L. Kainen (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 91 - 96 of 96
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Business Of The Supreme Court Under The Judiciary Act Of 1925: The Plenary Docket In The 1970'S, Arthur D. Hellman
The Business Of The Supreme Court Under The Judiciary Act Of 1925: The Plenary Docket In The 1970'S, Arthur D. Hellman
Articles
During the last decade, the Supreme Court has been deciding 65 to 70 cases a Term after oral argument. That represents a sharp decline from the 1970s and 1980s, the era of the Burger Court, when the Court was deciding about 150 cases a Term. The Burger Court’s docket, in turn, reflected a shift from the 1960s, when the docket was smaller. In short, what is “normal” for the plenary docket varies from one era to another. The period of the Burger Court retains a special interest in that regard because that was the only period after World War II …
The Taney Period, 1836-64, David S. Bogen
Book Review: Antecedents And Beginnings To 1801, David S. Bogen
Book Review: Antecedents And Beginnings To 1801, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Book Review: Reconstruction And Reunion, 1864-88, Part One, David S. Bogen
Book Review: Reconstruction And Reunion, 1864-88, Part One, David S. Bogen
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Searching For The Intent Of The Framers Of Fourteenth Amendment , Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
IN 1946 JUSTICE HUGO BLACK DECLARED that one of the objects of the fourteenth amendment was to apply the Bill of Rights to the States. He was confident that an analysis of the intent of the framers of the amendment would support his assertion. A few years later the Supreme Court requested such an investigation, but when the analysis was made and the results presented to it, the Supreme Court concluded that the framers' intent could not be determined. The uncertainty surrounding the intent of the framers of the fourteenth amendment has had profound implications on the application of that …
Professor Kurland, The Supreme Court And Political Science, Donald P. Kommers
Professor Kurland, The Supreme Court And Political Science, Donald P. Kommers
Journal Articles
IN A SYMPOSIUM held at the Notre Dame Law School on February 29, 1964, on several constitutional amendments designed to limit the power of the Supreme Court, Professor Philip B. Kurland of the University of Chicago Law School read a terse and delightfully witty paper in which he compared the Supreme Court to Caesar, sieged on the one side by the modem forces of Brutus, and championed on the other side by the contemporary Mark Antonys. There was no doubt in Professor Kurland's mind that the efforts of conspirators like the Council of State Governments, not to mention its less …