Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal profession

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 211 - 219 of 219

Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Manners, Morals And Legal Education, Thomas Ehrlich Jan 1972

Manners, Morals And Legal Education, Thomas Ehrlich

Articles by Maurer Faculty

Many spokesmen for the legal profession have been calling on the law schools to pay more attention to ethical responsibilities, usually meaning manners and civility. But many of today's law students believe that the profession is not meeting some of its public responsibilities. When that problem is squarely faced, with the law schools' help, then good manners should follow.


Minimum Fee Schedules: Guides Or Strait Jackets, Robert L. Simmons, Gary N. Holthus Jan 1972

Minimum Fee Schedules: Guides Or Strait Jackets, Robert L. Simmons, Gary N. Holthus

Cleveland State Law Review

Several states have minimum fee schedules that set the least amount of compensation a lawyer should charge for a specific legal service. There has been much confusion in bar associations across the country as to the application of minimum fee schedules and the consequences of non-compliance. The American Bar Association has published both formal and informal opinions in an attempt to clearly define the functions of the schedules. In view of the opinions, interviews and statistical studies on the subject of minimum fee schedules, it is apparent that they are too rigid to cope with the practical needs of the …


Report Of The Special Committee Of The American Bar Foundation On Canons Of Ethics, American Bar Foundation Jun 1958

Report Of The Special Committee Of The American Bar Foundation On Canons Of Ethics, American Bar Foundation

Miscellaneous Materials

The Special Committee on Canons of Ethics submits its report, detailing the procedures followed, the material accumulated, and the conclusions reached by the Special Committee since its appointment in February, 1955.


Necessity As A Justification: A Critique Of Perka, Donald Galloway Jun 1956

Necessity As A Justification: A Critique Of Perka, Donald Galloway

Dalhousie Law Journal

In his characteristically trenchant and influential investigation, "A Plea for Excuses",' J. L. Austin reminded us that we can and do use different strategies of defending a person when it is claimed that he has done wrong. He drew attention to two distinct tactics: One way of going about this (defending a person) is to admit that he, X, did that very thing, A, but to argue that it was a good thing, or the right or sensible thing, or a permissible thing to do . . . To take this line is to justify the action, to give reasons …


The Current Peril Of The Legal Profession, Robert G. Storey Sep 1955

The Current Peril Of The Legal Profession, Robert G. Storey

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.


Study Of Civil Code Of Practice, New Judicial Council And Judicial Conference, Watson Clay Jan 1950

Study Of Civil Code Of Practice, New Judicial Council And Judicial Conference, Watson Clay

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.


The Challenge Of The Critical Century, Elvis J. Stahr Jr. Jan 1949

The Challenge Of The Critical Century, Elvis J. Stahr Jr.

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Book Review. Lawyers And The Promotion Of Justice By Esther Lucille Brown, Fowler V. Harper Jan 1939

Book Review. Lawyers And The Promotion Of Justice By Esther Lucille Brown, Fowler V. Harper

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


The Opportunities And Responsibilites Of American Law Schools, Floyd R. Mechem Mar 1907

The Opportunities And Responsibilites Of American Law Schools, Floyd R. Mechem

Michigan Law Review

With two bodies dealing in general with the subject of legal education, the Section of Legal Education and this Association, meeting annually, and with occasionally a third, the Conference of State Boards of Law Examiners, each endeavoring to present papers and arouse discussion, it is obvious that the number of new questions which anyone may hope to suggest is necessarily, small. Most of the important questions have already been discussed, many of them more than once, and anything which is now presented is likely to smack of the truism or the platitude. The very remarkable increase, however, both in the …