Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons^™

Free Speech In The Balance: Judicial Sanctions And Frivolous Slapp Suits, Shine Sean Tu, Nicholas F. Stump

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review

The balance between free speech and access to courts in defamation tort actions is fraught with public policy concerns. On one hand, plaintiffs should have unencumbered access to the justice system to remedy real harms brought upon them by defamatory statements. However, defamation suits should not be wielded to suppress the constitutionally protected free speech rights of news organizations and of concerned citizens that are vital for well-functioning democracies. This Article argues for a new type of remedy, namely enhanced Rule 11 attorney sanctions, such as suspension or debarment, that should be available to defendants of defamation suits brought by …

A Fireside Chat With Supreme Court Justices Mcmillian And Warren, Carla Wong Mcmillian, Sarah Hawkins Warren

Edith House Lectures

The Women's Law Student Association is hosting the 38th Annual Edith House Lecture featuring Georgia Supreme Court Justices Carla Wong McMillian and Sarah Hawkins Warren. Inaugurated in 1983, the Edith House Lecture Series honors one of the first female graduates of the School of Law, Edith Elizabeth House. House was co-valedictorian of the law class of 1925 and enjoyed a distinguished career in public service.

In a moderated “fireside chat” format, Justices McMillian and Warren spoke about their backgrounds, experiences as women in the legal profession, and paths to Georgia’s highest court. Students and faculty had the opportunity to ask …

Recent Trends In The Civil Liability Of Physicians And Its Consequences On Heightening Their Professional Obligations, Benseghir Mourad

UAEU Law Journal

Medical responsibility has developed rapidly due to scientific progress and modern medical discoveries. This has been reflected physicians’ practice and their involvement in medical interventions through the legal aspects of medicine and its scientific principles towards their patients. These factors have piled up to give us a new direction in the path of medical responsibility aimed primarily at balancing and protecting the interests of doctors and patients.

This study deals with a very important and precise issue, as it relates to the essence and the basis of the profession of human medicine, namely, the tendency to gradually tighten professional physicians' …

The Scope Of The Physician's Commitment To Inform The Patient Of The Medical Risks: A Comparative Study, Ahmed Jarad

UAEU Law Journal

In view of the frequent and emergent technological developments in equipment and machines for diagnosis, treatment, and the successive discoveries of biomedical research that may cause unusual damage to patients; and in regard to a growing public knowledge about the basic data related to many aspects of access to medical information, it was necessary to transfer the nature of the relationship between the doctor and his patient from absolute medical custody to the gradual partnership in taking the appropriate decision for medical intervention according to the patient's health situation. This ultimately requires to inform the patient immediately of his health …

Civil Liability For Damage Resulting From Genetically Modified Organisms (Gmos): A Comparative Study

UAEU Law Journal

The most serious damage to human and other living organisms at present is the damage of genetically modified organisms, where they can eventually be used as weapons of mass destruction in the form of a bacteriological war that destroys human civilization, we will present the problem in terms of: Identification of genetically modified organisms by determining their scope, and to identify the aspects of the damage resulting from them, and how to compensate each type of species, whether it is related to plant, animal, human or the environment. We then present the legal basis for civil liability resulting from damage …

Transformational Leadership, Conflict Management Style, And Job Satisfaction In Law Enforcement, Giuseppe Alise

Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs)

Abstract

Effective leaders are essential for any organization, including law enforcement. Police work is not free from the challenges of leadership, confronted with its own unique challenges, including developing ways to adapt to rapid change and continually having to adjust to various political and environmental factors.

This research is an in-depth examination of how transformational leadership and conflict management style drive job satisfaction in law enforcement. The goal is to determine whether employee satisfaction achieved through transformational leadership is, in fact, largely the result of how leadership handles conflict. The idea is to disentangle the relationship between transformational leadership and …

Corporate Law For Good People, Yuval Feldman, Adi Libson, Gideon Parchomovsky

Northwestern University Law Review

This Article offers a novel analysis of the field of corporate governance by viewing it through the lens of behavioral ethics. It calls for both shifting the focus of corporate governance to a new set of loci of potential corporate wrongdoing and adding new tools to the corporate governance arsenal. Behavioral ethics scholarship emphasizes that the large share of wrongdoing is generated by “good people” whose intention is to act ethically. Their wrongdoing stems from “bounded ethicality”—various cognitive and motivational limitations in their ethical decision-making processes—that leads to biased decisions that seem legitimate. Bounded ethicality has important implications for a …

Collared—A Film Case Study About Insider Trading And Ethics, Garrick Apollon

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

This Article discusses the visual legal advocacy documentary film, Collared, by Garrick Apollon (author of this Article). Collared premiered in fall 2018 to a sold-out audience at the Hot Docs Cinema in Toronto for the Hot Docs for Continuing Professional Education edutainment initiative. Collared features the story and reveals the testimony of a convicted ex-insider trader who is still struggling with the tragic consequences of “the most prolonged insider trading scheme ever discovered by American and Canadian securities investigators.” The intimate insights shared by former lawyer and reformed white-collar criminal, Joseph Grmovsek, serves as a painful reminder of the …

“Listserv Lawyering”: Definition And Exploration Of Its Utility In Representation Of Consumer Debtors In Bankruptcy And In Law Practice Generally, Josiah M. Daniel Iii

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

The author examines the communications and activities of bankruptcy lawyers participating in the listserv of the Bankruptcy Law Section of the State Bar of Texas and finds that those activities constitute a previously unrecognized form of “lawyering,” which he has defined as the work of lawyers in and through the legal system to accomplish the objectives of their clients. Review of specific postings about legal issues and practical problems by Texas bankruptcy lawyers, whose practices are primarily on behalf of individual debtors in cases under Chapters 7 and 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and observations about the voluntary, collaborative, and …

Punishing The Victim: Model Rule 1.16(A)(2) And Its Relation To Lawyers With Anxiety, Depression, And Bipolar Disorder, Daniel G. Esquivel

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

Abstract forthcoming.

When Mental Health Meets “The One-Armed Man” Defense: How Courts Should Deal With Mccoy Defendants, Farid Seyyedi

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

The Supreme Court’s opinion in McCoy v. Louisiana held that a defendant has a constitutional right to insist their attorney not concede guilt as to any element of an offense, even if doing so is the only reasonable trial strategy to give the defendant a chance at life imprisonment instead of the death penalty. Under McCoy’s holding, a defendant can insist on maintaining their innocence—even in the face of overwhelming evidence—and force their attorney to pursue a defense that will land them on death row. The Supreme Court’s holding makes clear that a strategic concession of guilt at trial—over …

Ethics In An Echo Chamber: Legal Ethics & The Peremptory Challenge, Kayley A. Viteo

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

Abstract forthcoming.

Where's Rudy?, James E. Moliterno

Scholarly Articles

Choice of law in lawyer discipline matters, and the language among the popular choice of law rules in use matters. The core goals of choice of law principles should not limit the choices to the states in which a lawyer has a full, formal license. Doing so undermines the modern choice of law interests analysis by eliminating jurisdictions that may have the greatest interest in the conduct.

Lawyers cross borders physically and electronically on a daily basis. Accordingly, choice of law rules are critical, especially when a lawyer engages in missions that are targeted at particular jurisdictions, as Rudy Giuliani …

Inside-Out: Bringing Law Students Face-To-Face With Injustice, Romie Griesmer

University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class

No abstract provided.

Lawyer Speech, Investigative Deception, And The First Amendment, Rebecca Aviel, Alan K. Chen, False

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

It seems unassailable that attorneys must refrain from deception or dishonesty of any kind as a condition of professional licensure. But this principle, one of the foundational norms of the legal profession, may well infringe upon First Amendment rights, at least in certain applications. In this Article, we confront the tension between an attorney’s expressive and associational rights and her professional duty of absolute honesty. We explain that the latter must yield to the former in the unique circumstances presented by undercover investigations, where attorneys work side-by-side with journalists, civil rights testers, political activists, and others who seek to expose …

Remembering Professor Rhonda Gay Hartman, Ken Gormley

Duquesne Law Review

Professor Rhonda Gay Hartman, who passed away unexpectedly in April of 2021 as this issue of the Duquesne Law Review was being finalized, was an elegant, forward-thinking, brilliant scholar and teacher. She left a lasting imprint on legal academia, on the Duquesne community, and on the thousands of students whom she taught and mentored for over twenty-five years.

Frivolous Defenses, Thomas D. Russell

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

This article is about civil procedure, torts, insurance, litigation, and professional ethics. This is an empirical piece with data drawn from a sample of 356 answers to 298 complaints in car crash lawsuits to identify various ways that, I argue, insurance defense lawyers evade the rules of civil procedure and, frankly, act unprofessionally.

The empirical center of this piece examines 356 answers in car crash personal injury cases in Colorado’s district courts. First, I situate these cases within dispute pyramid elements including the total number of miles-traveled within Colorado and also with respect to the volume of civil litigation.

The …

Allocating Medicine Fairly In An Unfair Pandemic, Govind Persad

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

America’s COVID-19 pandemic has both devastated and disparately harmed minority communities. How can the allocation of scarce treatments for COVID-19 and similar public health threats fairly and legally respond to these racial disparities? Some have proposed that members of racial groups who have been especially hard-hit by the pandemic should receive priority for scarce treatments. Others have worried that this prioritization misidentifies racial disparities as reflecting biological differences rather than structural racism, or that it will generate mistrust among groups who have previously been harmed by medical research. Still others complain that such prioritization would be fundamentally unjust. I argue …

Ordinary Clients, Overreaching Lawyers, And The Failure To Implement Adequate Client Protection Measures, Leslie C. Levin

American University Law Review

Every year, thousands of individual clients are victimized by overreaching lawyers who overcharge clients, refuse to return unearned fees, or steal their money. For more than forty years, the American Bar Association (ABA) has considered, and often proposed, client protection measures aimed at protecting clients from overreaching lawyers. These measures include requirements that lawyers use written fee agreements in their dealings with clients and rules relating to fee arbitration, client protection funds, insurance payee notification, and random audits of trust accounts. This Article examines what happened to these ABA recommendations when the states considered them and assesses the current state …

Revising The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure: Carving Out A More Active Role For Congress, Michael Vitiello

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Dangerous To Be Right When Established Authorities Are Wrong: A Proposal For The Protection Of America’S Migratory Birds, Dylan-Forrest F. Greene

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Specialty Bar Associations And The Marketing Of Ethics: The Example Of The Academy Of Adoption Attorneys, Malinda L. Seymore

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Looking Beyond The Profit And Into The Light: Consumer Financial Protections And The Common Good, Veryl V. Miles

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Symposium Spring 2021: The Ethics Of Government Service

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Anatomy Of Government Ethics Reform: Lessons Learned, A Path Forward, Paula A. Franzese

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Unweaving Hubbard’S Web: A Review Of Alabama’S Ethics Laws, Ferris Stephens, Andrew R. D'Entremont

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Who Should Police Politicization Of The Doj?, Bruce A. Greene, Rebecca Roiphe

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Justice Department And The Rule Of Law, Jonathan Kravis, Jessie K. Liu

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

Appeal Waivers: When Must They Be Raised?, Nicole A. Paige

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.

The Strained Relationship Between Hair Discrimination And Title Vii Litigation And Why It Is Time To Use A Different Solution, Christine Kennedy

Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy

No abstract provided.