Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

1996

Discipline
Institution
Keyword
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 151 - 153 of 153

Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility

Codes And Virtues: Can Good Lawyers Be Good Ethical Deliberators?, Heidi Li Feldman Jan 1996

Codes And Virtues: Can Good Lawyers Be Good Ethical Deliberators?, Heidi Li Feldman

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers' conduct will be flawed as an instrument of ethics for lawyers. This is the central thesis of this Article. It is motivated by the idea that typical statutory prohibitions and permissions are likely to stunt sentimental responsiveness, a key feature of good ethical deliberation. Additionally, a certain technocratic mode of legal analysis heightens this tendency. Although other styles of lawyering might better engender sentimental responsiveness, statutory codes of lawyers' ethics do not invite this style as readily as a welldeveloped common law of lawyers' ethics would.


Introduction, Harold H. Bruff Jan 1996

Introduction, Harold H. Bruff

Publications

As citizens, we ought to ensure that our criticisms of Congress are constructive, lest we damage ourselves. In that spirit, the American Bar Association's Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice created a special Congressional Process Committee to study selected aspects of congressional procedures and to recommend appropriate reforms. The Committee, which I chair, is composed of administrative lawyers who are experienced in legislative practice, or who have worked in Congress. We decided to address selected aspects of congressional structure and procedure for which we believe administrative lawyers possess relevant expertise.

The articles that form this Symposium grew out of …


Bifurcation Of Undersecured Claims In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson Jan 1996

Bifurcation Of Undersecured Claims In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson

Articles

The article examines the legal implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Dewsnup v. Timm on the bifurcation of undersecured claims in bankruptcy law. It critiques the ruling for creating confusion and potential inequities, arguing that it may diverge from the intent of the Bankruptcy Code. The analysis highlights the need for clearer guidelines to ensure consistent and fair treatment of secured and unsecured claims across different bankruptcy chapters.