Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (32)
- Law and Society (31)
- Legal Profession (26)
- State and Local Government Law (26)
- Health Law and Policy (25)
-
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (23)
- Immigration Law (22)
- Jurisprudence (22)
- Military, War, and Peace (22)
- Legal Education (16)
- Arts and Humanities (11)
- Religion (11)
- Business (9)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Ethics in Religion (9)
- Philosophy (9)
- Bioethics and Medical Ethics (8)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (8)
- Ethics and Political Philosophy (8)
- Medicine and Health Sciences (8)
- Courts (7)
- Organizations Law (7)
- Administrative Law (6)
- International Law (6)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (6)
- Biodiversity (5)
- Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (5)
- Environmental Policy (5)
- Institution
-
- Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (23)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- William & Mary Law School (13)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Western Michigan University (8)
-
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (7)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (3)
- Fordham Law School (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (2)
- University of Michigan Law School (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- Campbell University School of Law (1)
- Cleveland State University (1)
- Langston University (1)
- Mercer University School of Law (1)
- New York Law School (1)
- North Carolina Central University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Legal ethics (30)
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (19)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (19)
- Legal Ethics (12)
- Environmental law (8)
-
- Ethics (7)
- (decided (6)
- Accountability (6)
- CAO (6)
- Constitutions (6)
- Federal (6)
- IFC (6)
- International law (6)
- Legal Education (6)
- New York (6)
- New York State constitution (6)
- Right to Counsel (6)
- Student comment (6)
- World bank (6)
- 1995) (5)
- Professional responsibility (5)
- Due Process Clause (4)
- Inc. (4)
- Legal education (4)
- NAFTA (4)
- North American Free Trade Agreement (4)
- U.S. Const. amend. V (4)
- ABA (3)
- Attorney discipline (3)
- Attorneys (3)
- Publication
-
- Journal of the Institute for the Study of Legal Ethics (22)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (22)
- Faculty Scholarship (10)
- William & Mary Law Review (10)
- Center for the Study of Ethics in Society Papers (8)
-
- Articles (7)
- Loyola University Chicago Law Journal (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- IFC E&S Performance Standards (6)
- Biodiversity Protection: Implementation and Reform of the Endangered Species Act (Summer Conference, June 9-12) (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Oregon Law Institute, 1996 (3)
- Buffalo Law Review (2)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Popular Media (2)
- Publications (2)
- The Clark Memorandum (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- BYU Law Review (1)
- Campbell Law Review (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Freedman Institute for the Study of Legal Ethics Conferences (1)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (1)
- Law Publications (1)
- McCabe Thesis Collection (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 151 - 153 of 153
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Codes And Virtues: Can Good Lawyers Be Good Ethical Deliberators?, Heidi Li Feldman
Codes And Virtues: Can Good Lawyers Be Good Ethical Deliberators?, Heidi Li Feldman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers' conduct will be flawed as an instrument of ethics for lawyers. This is the central thesis of this Article. It is motivated by the idea that typical statutory prohibitions and permissions are likely to stunt sentimental responsiveness, a key feature of good ethical deliberation. Additionally, a certain technocratic mode of legal analysis heightens this tendency. Although other styles of lawyering might better engender sentimental responsiveness, statutory codes of lawyers' ethics do not invite this style as readily as a welldeveloped common law of lawyers' ethics would.
Introduction, Harold H. Bruff
Introduction, Harold H. Bruff
Publications
As citizens, we ought to ensure that our criticisms of Congress are constructive, lest we damage ourselves. In that spirit, the American Bar Association's Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice created a special Congressional Process Committee to study selected aspects of congressional procedures and to recommend appropriate reforms. The Committee, which I chair, is composed of administrative lawyers who are experienced in legislative practice, or who have worked in Congress. We decided to address selected aspects of congressional structure and procedure for which we believe administrative lawyers possess relevant expertise.
The articles that form this Symposium grew out of …
Bifurcation Of Undersecured Claims In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson
Bifurcation Of Undersecured Claims In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson
Articles
The article examines the legal implications of the Supreme Court's decision in Dewsnup v. Timm on the bifurcation of undersecured claims in bankruptcy law. It critiques the ruling for creating confusion and potential inequities, arguing that it may diverge from the intent of the Bankruptcy Code. The analysis highlights the need for clearer guidelines to ensure consistent and fair treatment of secured and unsecured claims across different bankruptcy chapters.