Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (196)
- UC Law SF (98)
- Pepperdine University (31)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (25)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (23)
-
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (18)
- New York Law School (13)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (11)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- UIC School of Law (10)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- Pace University (8)
- University of Colorado Law School (8)
- University of the Pacific (7)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (7)
- BLR (6)
- Boston University School of Law (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (6)
- University of Michigan Law School (6)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Kentucky (5)
- University of Maine School of Law (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- University of Richmond (5)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Marquette University Law School (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (4)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (67)
- Ethics (36)
- Judicial ethics (34)
- Legal ethics (27)
- Judiciary (21)
-
- Constitution (18)
- Judge (18)
- Supreme Court (18)
- Judicial independence (17)
- Law (17)
- Courts (16)
- Recusal (16)
- Impartiality (12)
- Legal Profession (12)
- Court (11)
- Discrimination (11)
- First Amendment (11)
- Constitutional law (10)
- Judicial Ethics (10)
- Judicial conduct (10)
- Misconduct (10)
- Federal (9)
- Judicial (9)
- Judicial misconduct (9)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Justice (9)
- Lawyers (9)
- Politics (9)
- Professional responsibility (9)
- Roger J Miner (9)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Publicity & News Clippings (98)
- Touro Law Review (23)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (22)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (17)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (13)
- St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics (13)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (9)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Publications (8)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (7)
- McGeorge Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (7)
- ExpressO (6)
- Fordham Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Works (6)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (6)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (5)
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (5)
- University of Richmond Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Faculty Articles (4)
- Faculty Works (4)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (4)
- Marquette Law Review (4)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 511 - 540 of 674
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
Science And Ethics In Conducting, Analyzing, And Reporting Social Science Research: Implications For Social Scientists, Judges, And Lawyers, Robert Rosenthal, Peter David Blanck
Science And Ethics In Conducting, Analyzing, And Reporting Social Science Research: Implications For Social Scientists, Judges, And Lawyers, Robert Rosenthal, Peter David Blanck
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Stalwart At The Bar, Arthur Norman Field
A Stalwart At The Bar, Arthur Norman Field
Cardozo Law Review
The New York legal community that Jack Bums found upon his admission to the Bar in 1932 was not given to welcoming all comers. It was changing rapidly. To many leaders of the Bar the change was not a positive one.
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
In Re Holtzman: Free Speech Or Professional Misconduct?, David W. Wright
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Role Of A Chief Justice In Canada, Peter W. Hogg
The Role Of A Chief Justice In Canada, Peter W. Hogg
Articles & Book Chapters
Professor Hogg describes the duties of Chief Justices in Canadian courts, and explains that the effective discharge of their many administrative functions plays a significant role in maintaining the independence of the judiciary.
Specifying Grounds For Judicial Disqualification In Federal Courts., Leslie W. Abramson
Specifying Grounds For Judicial Disqualification In Federal Courts., Leslie W. Abramson
Faculty and Staff Scholarship
One essential component of equal justice under the law is a neutral and detached judge to preside over the court proceedings. Public confidence in the legal system is maintained when a judge has no interest in the parties, attorneys or subject matter of the litigation. Sua sponte or by motion of a party, a federal judge is subject to disqualification for conflicts of interest on both constitutional and statutory grounds
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
The Thomas Hearings: Watching Ourselves, Robert F. Nagel
The Thomas Hearings: Watching Ourselves, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
Judicial Asceticism, Larry Kramer
Judicial Ethics: Political Activity And Fund Raising, Marlene Arnold Nicholson
Judicial Ethics: Political Activity And Fund Raising, Marlene Arnold Nicholson
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Misconduct During Jury Deliberations, Bennett L. Gershman
Judicial Misconduct During Jury Deliberations, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
The author considers the two principal types of improper judicial behavior that may occur during the jury deliberation process. Judicial conduct that attempts to place undue pressure on a jury to reach a verdict may include verdict-urging instructions, threats and intimidation, and inquiry into the numerical division of the jury on the merits of the verdict. Judicial participation in private, ex parte communications with jurors may also subvert orderly trial procedure and undermine the impartiality of the jury. Neither kind of judicial conduct may be allowed to compel a verdict from a jury.
The Illinois Code Of Judicial Conduct And The Appearance Of Impropriety, Jeffrey M. Shaman
The Illinois Code Of Judicial Conduct And The Appearance Of Impropriety, Jeffrey M. Shaman
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Self-Regulation Of Judicial Misconduct Could Be Mis-Regulation, Anthony D'Amato
Michigan Law Review
Judge Harry T. Edwards has written a lucid and seemingly logical plea for the judiciary to be granted exclusive self-regulation over all matters of judicial misconduct that fall short of crimes or impeachable offenses. His essay demonstrates the seriousness with which he regards misconduct that would bring shame to the federal judiciary. He believes that the judiciary as a whole is the best institution to ascertain and take measures against individual aberrant judges who are guilty of various forms of misconduct, and I have no doubt of the sincerity of his belief. Yet when we look at claims for self-regulation …
Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann
Administrative Failure And Local Democracy: The Politics Of Deshaney, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay is an effort to construct a normative basis for a constitutional theory to resist the Supreme Court's recent decision in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services.1 In DeShaney, the Court decided that a local social service worker's failure to prevent child abuse did not violate the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment even though the social worker "had reason to believe" the abuse was occurring. 2 Chief Justice Rehnquist's opinion for the Court held that government inaction cannot violate due process unless the state has custody of the victim, 3 thus settling a controversial …
Ringing The Bell, Roger J. Miner '56
Retrospective Justification, Jeffrey Malkan
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
Life And Death Decisions: A Reply To Judge Peccarelli, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 569 (1990), Irwin R. Kramer
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
A Response To Irwin Kramer's Reply, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 585 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
A Moral Dilemma: The Role Of Judicial Intervention In Withholding Or Withdrawing Nutrition And Hydration, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (1990), Anthony M. Peccarelli
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Ethics: The Less-Often Asked Questions, Andrew L. Kaufman
Judicial Ethics: The Less-Often Asked Questions, Andrew L. Kaufman
Washington Law Review
Judicial ethics is a topic of increasing interest to the public, the bar, and the judiciary; only recently has the body of substantive law regarding judicial behavior begun to take shape. This essay explores the less developed issues of ex parte communication by judges, activities of judges' spouses, the obligation of judges to report attorney disciplinary violations, and extrajudicial comments by judges about legal matters. The Author analyzes the positions on these issues of the ABA Code of Judicial Conduct, the Judicial Conference of the United States' Code of Conduct for United States Judges, and the Discussion Draft of Draft …
Towards Greater Openness In Judicial Conduct Commission Proceedings: Temporary Confidentiality As An Alternative To Inviolate Confidentiality—Garner V. Cherberg, 111 Wash. 2d 811, 765 P.2d 1284 (1988), Tom Montgomery
Washington Law Review
In Garner v. Cherberg, the Washington Supreme Court upheld certain rules of inviolate confidentiality adopted by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct. This Note examines the justifications for such confidentiality rules, and proposes temporary, rather than inviolate, confidentiality to better balance interests of fairness and the public's right to know.