Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (228)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (56)
- University of Colorado Law School (49)
- DePaul University (26)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (22)
-
- Pepperdine University (16)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (14)
- University of Michigan Law School (13)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (10)
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- BLR (8)
- New York Law School (8)
- Pace University (8)
- Fordham Law School (7)
- St. Mary's University (7)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- University of Maine School of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Georgia State University College of Law (5)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (5)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (5)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (5)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Winthrop University (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Brooklyn Law School (4)
- Cornell University Law School (4)
- Roger Williams University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (36)
- Constitutional Law (34)
- Federal (32)
- Constitutional law (30)
- Professional Ethics (28)
-
- Ethics (25)
- Supreme Court (24)
- New York (21)
- Sixth Amendment (21)
- Law (20)
- Right to counsel (20)
- Congress (19)
- Legislation (19)
- First Amendment (18)
- State (18)
- Defendant (17)
- House Judiciary Committee (17)
- M. Caldwell Butler (17)
- Impeachment of President Richard M. Nixon (16)
- Legal ethics (15)
- Colorado (14)
- Right to Counsel (14)
- California (13)
- Court of Appeals (13)
- Sixth amendment (13)
- § 6 (13)
- Courts (12)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Evidence (11)
- U.S. Forest Service (11)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (199)
- Touro Law Review (51)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
-
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- Michigan Law Review (12)
- Butler-Woodlief Recordings (11)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (11)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (9)
- ExpressO (8)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (7)
- Fragile Coalition Interviews (6)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (5)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Georgia State University Law Review (5)
- Maine Law Review (5)
- NYLS Law Review (5)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (5)
- Articles (4)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Fordham Law Review (4)
- Journal of Legal Studies in Business (4)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (4)
- UIC Law Review (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 511 - 540 of 637
Full-Text Articles in Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility
A Note To Our Readers, The Editors
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Historical Framework For Reviving Constitutional Protection For Property And Contract Rights , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
Post-New Deal constitutionalism is in search of a theory that justifies judicial intervention on behalf of individual rights while simultaneously avoiding the charge of "Lochnerism."' The dominant historical view dismisses post-bellum substantive due process as an anomalous development in the American constitutional tradition. Under this approach, Lochner represents unbounded protection for economic rights that permitted the judiciary to read laissez faire, pro-business policy preferences into the constitutional text. Today's revisionists have mounted a substantial challenge to the dismissive views of traditionalists. Indeed, some claim Lochner reached the right result, but for the wrong reason. The revisionists characterize substantive due process …
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
The "Gag Rule" Revisited: Physicians As Abortion Gatekeepers, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
The "Gag Rule" Revisited: Physicians As Abortion Gatekeepers, Maxwell Gregg Bloche
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
To the surprise of many and the dismay of some, the U.S. Supreme Court took it upon itself last term to proclaim a national compromise on the question of abortion. The Court's announced truce, an elaboration on Justice O'Connor's "undue burden" idea, is pragmatic in design but unlikely to prove stable in practice. The three justices who spoke for the Court disparaged Roe with reluctant praise, then upheld its outer shell on the ground that social expectations and the need to sustain the appearance of the rule of law made it impolitic to do otherwise. This awkward doctrinal invention seems …
State Ethics Rules And Federal Prosecutors: The Controversies Over The Anti-Contact And Subpoena Rules, Roger C. Cramton, Lisa K. Udell
State Ethics Rules And Federal Prosecutors: The Controversies Over The Anti-Contact And Subpoena Rules, Roger C. Cramton, Lisa K. Udell
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Fall And Rise Of The Criminal Contingent Fee, Peter Lushing
The Fall And Rise Of The Criminal Contingent Fee, Peter Lushing
Articles
The article argues that the ban on contingent fees for criminal defense attorneys, established by the American Bar Association in 1969, is outdated and should be repealed. It contends that the ban is rooted in historical prejudice and unfounded concerns about conflicts of interest, rather than empirical evidence. The author suggests that the Supreme Court's 1989 decision implicitly approving contingent fees in certain criminal cases presents an opportunity to reconsider this prohibition. Repealing the ban could benefit middle-class defendants and allow for regulation and data collection to address potential issues.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Gender Based Peremptory Challenges And The New York State Constitution, Frederick T. Kelsey
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne