Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons^™

Ua12/2/2 Talisman: Think Big, Think Red, Wku Student Affairs

WKU Administration Documents

1990 Talisman yearbook with the following articles:

• West, Jodie. Wake Up, Western: Bemis Bids America Good Morning
• Hadley, Kim. Monster Bash – Hilloween
• Westmeier, Tracy. Individuals Versus the Law – Roe vs. Wade
• Hardin, Billy. Collection of Firsts – Homecoming
• McDonald, Denise. ‘Tis the Season – Madrigals
• Hadley, Kim. Campus Hotlines – Prank Phone Calls
• Givens, Jennifer. Land of the Lost
• Davis, Sarah. A World of Difference – Earth Day
• Hadley, Kim. For Official Use Only – WKU Seal
• Hardin, Billy. Cultural Exchange – Xiu Sun
• Hadley, Kim. Politics – Nelson Mandela, Lithuania, Manuel Noriega, China, Freedom Fighters, Eastern Europe …

Limiting Incarceration For Civil Contempt In Child Custody Cases, David J. Harmer

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

The Ethics Of The "Unprofessional Profession", Gerald Caplan

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Character and Cops: Ethics in Policing by Edwin J. Delattre

Reform And Regret: The Story Of Federal Judicial Involvement In The Alabama Prison System, Steven M. Farina

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Reform and Regret: The Story of Federal Judicial Involvement in the Alabama Prison System by Larry W. Yackle

Insider Trading By Foreigners In United States Securities Markets: A Pervasive Problem And Prosecutorial Nightmare, Scott M. Zemser

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Critical Points In The Progress Of A Capital Case, Elizabeth A. Bennett

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Capital Pretrial Motions: Added Dimensions, Thomas W. Plimpton, Kerry D. Lee

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction, William S. Geimer

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Giarratano V. Procunier 891 F.2d 483 (4th Cir. 1989)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Boggs V. Bair 892 F.2d 1193 (4th Cir. 1989)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Coleman V. Thompson F.2d _ (4th Cir. 1990)

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Spencer V. Commonwealth [Spencer Iii] Va.., 385 S.E.2d 850 (1989) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Robbery, Rape And Abduction: Alone And As Predicate Offenses To Capital Murder, Cary P. Mosely, Carolyn M. Richardson

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Where Do We Go From Here? - Post-Conviction Review Of Death Sentences, Juliette A. Falkner

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Rico Reform: How Much Is Needed?, William J. Hughes

Vanderbilt Law Review

RICO reform has been one of the most time-consuming and difficult issues in the 101st Congress. The House Subcommittee on Crime has held three full-day hearings on RICO reform, listening to testimony from a vast array of witnesses on both sides of the reform issue, and several in the middle. From a personal perspective, hardly a day has passed in the last nine months that I have not had a meeting, a discussion with a House colleague, or a staff session on the subject of RICO reform.At the outset I should mention that I do not have a magic "silver …

Is There A Rational Justification For Punishing An Accomplished Crime More Severely Than An Attempted Crime? A Comment On Prof. Dr. Björn Burkhardt's Paper, Mordechai Kremnitzer

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

Meaningful Access For Indigents On Death Row: Giarratano V. Murray And The Right To Counsel In Post-Conviction Proceedings, William H. Brooks

Vanderbilt Law Review

In 1932 the United States Supreme Court held that the states must provide free legal counsel to indigent defendants in capital cases.' Since then the Court has continued to define the scope of an indigent death row defendant's right to counsel at various critical stages of the defendant's trial and appeal. Following a direct appeal to the state court of appeals and state supreme court, an inmate on death row may seek a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court. A prisoner is not entitled to state appointed counsel for that action.

Next, the defendant may seek post-conviction …

Life-Without-Parole: An Alternative To Death Or Not Much Of A Life At All?, Julian H. Wright, Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

This Note will discuss the relatively recent development and current prevalence of one alternative: the life sentence without benefit of parole, commonly called life-without-parole (LWOP). Life-without-parole is the penultimate penalty, meaning in theory the incarceration of convicts for their natural lives without the possibility of release on parole. In practice, LWOP generally means what it says, although various states do retain some release mechanisms for LWOP inmates, like executive commutation or a set term of years. The idea of jailing individuals for the rest of their lives is at least as old in the Western legal tradition as the Tower …

Illinois V. Perkins: Approving The Use Of Police Trickery In Prison To Circumvent Miranda, Charles E. Glennon Honorable, Tayebe Shah-Mirani

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Addressing The Needs Of Attorneys For The Damned, Sean O'Brien

Faculty Works

This article is an introduction to the UMKC Law Review symposium issue dedicated to exploring the topic of capital punishment. UMKC Professor of Law Sean O’Brien shares how the growing importance of capital litigation makes this a timely and appropriate subject for consideration and shares how the university and the Law Review's attention to the death penalty debate contributes to more than just academic discussion.

Haven Or Hell? Inside Lorton Central Prison: Experiences Of Punishment Justified, Robert Blecker

Articles & Chapters

No abstract provided.

Capital Punishment In Missouri: Recent Developments In The Interpretation And Administration Of The Death Penalty, Ellen Y. Suni

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

A Step Towards Fairness In Capital Litigation: Missouri Resource Center, Sean O'Brien

Faculty Works

No abstract provided.

Where To Draw The Guideline: Factoring The Fruits Of Illegal Searches Into Sentencing Guidelines Calculations, Cheryl G. Bader, David S. Douglas

Touro Law Review

No abstract provided.

Can We End The Shame?--Recent Multilateral Efforts To Address The World Child Pornography Market, Julia Foreman

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

In this Note, the author describes the United States and international child pornography markets. The author demonstrates how the United States Congress, judiciary, and law enforcement agencies have addressed the child pornography problem at the national and international level. In addition to the United States efforts to address this problem, the Netherlands, Denmark, and Thailand--who have all exported child pornography to the United States--have taken steps to curb the flow of child pornography. National and international child pornography markets continue to flourish, however, and the author concludes that more steps to eradicate child pornography are necessary. Finally, the author describes …

The Ker-Frisbie Doctrine: A Jurisdictional Weapon In The War On Drugs, Andrew B. Campbell

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

This Note addresses the ongoing use of extra legal apprehension, as applied under "Ker v. Illinois" and "Frisbie v. Collins," as a viable alternative to extradition in obtaining custody over those accused of exporting drugs to the United States. The author outlines the cultural and political reasons for the production of illicit drugs, examines the purposes and structures of formal extradition treaties and their effectiveness in bringing drug traffickers to trial, and considers the alternatives to formal extradition. The author concludes that extralegal apprehension, in both of its two forms--abduction and irregular rendition--should remain an alternative means of securing custody …

Resolving The Remedial Dilemma: Strategies Of Judicial Intervention In Prisons, Susan P. Sturm

Faculty Scholarship

During the last several decades, courts have undertaken to remedy ongoing constitutional and statutory violations in a variety of public and private institutions. Once a court determines that an institutional pattern or practice violates the law, it must face the challenge of structuring a process that will lead to the elimination of the illegal conditions or practices. Whether this judicial activity is called "ordinary" or "extraordinary," the remedial process in institutional reform litigation may lead the trial court to engage in a range of roles beyond those usually required to "resolve a traditional private dispute.

Courts involved in institutional reform …

Washington's New Sexual Offender Civil Commitment System: An Unconstitutional Commitment System And Unwise Policy Choice, Brian G. Bodine

Seattle University Law Review

This Comment will discuss the portion of the legislation that established the system of involuntary civil commitment of violent sexual predators [hereinafter Violent Sexual Predator Commitment System]. This Comment will explore whether the Violent Sexual Predator Commitment System could withstand procedural and substantive due process challenges. Additionally, because the system is premised on a mental disorder of the sexually violent person, the commitment scheme will also be compared with the Involuntary Treatment Act's civil commitment system, to determine whether the Violent Sexual Predator Commitment System violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. After …

"Carrot And Stick" Sentencing: Structuring Incentives For Organizational Defendants, John C. Coffee Jr.

Faculty Scholarship

The new "Draft Guidelines for Organizational Defendants" released by the U.S. Sentencing Commission on October 25, 1990, explicitly adopt a "'carrot and stick' approach" to sentencing. While the boldly instrumental use made of sentencing penalties and credits in these guidelines will trouble some, the larger question is whether the Commission's social engineering will work. Two issues stand out: First, is the Commission's carrot mightier than its stick? At first glance, this may seem a surprising question because the "stick" in the Commission's guidelines seemingly packs a Ruthian wallop: fines under the draft guidelines are based on a multiple of the …

South Carolina V. Gathers 109 S. Ct. 2207,104 L. Ed. 2d 876 (1989) United States Supreme Court

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.