Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (1609)
- Criminal Procedure (1359)
- Constitutional Law (941)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (744)
- Law and Society (673)
-
- Law and Race (632)
- Fourth Amendment (581)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (575)
- Courts (517)
- State and Local Government Law (506)
- Human Rights Law (465)
- Fourteenth Amendment (426)
- Supreme Court of the United States (411)
- Evidence (409)
- Legislation (359)
- Juvenile Law (349)
- Jurisprudence (347)
- Law and Gender (338)
- Law and Politics (324)
- Health Law and Policy (312)
- Legal History (309)
- International Law (307)
- Privacy Law (303)
- Science and Technology Law (299)
- Law and Psychology (297)
- Judges (292)
- Administrative Law (290)
- Legal Remedies (285)
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (709)
- University of Michigan Law School (562)
- Seattle University School of Law (235)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (184)
- American University Washington College of Law (140)
-
- Columbia Law School (138)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (129)
- William & Mary Law School (118)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (100)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (88)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (87)
- University of Washington School of Law (81)
- UIC School of Law (75)
- Pace University (61)
- Brigham Young University Law School (59)
- University of Colorado Law School (59)
- West Virginia University (56)
- Cleveland State University (54)
- University of Baltimore Law (50)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (49)
- New York Law School (49)
- Pepperdine University (48)
- Old Dominion University (46)
- University of Kentucky (46)
- St. John's University School of Law (45)
- University of Georgia School of Law (45)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (44)
- Boston University School of Law (42)
- University of the District of Columbia School of Law (41)
- St. Mary's University (40)
- Keyword
-
- Police (476)
- Capital punishment sentencing (412)
- Law enforcement (226)
- Capital punishment (198)
- Prisons (162)
-
- Criminal justice (146)
- Criminal law (128)
- Fourth Amendment (124)
- Law Enforcement (122)
- Prisoners (120)
- Policing (117)
- Incarceration (112)
- Punishment (110)
- Sentencing (97)
- United States Supreme Court (95)
- Race (93)
- Evidence (75)
- Constitution (74)
- Eighth Amendment (69)
- Prison (68)
- Supreme Court (67)
- Searches (65)
- Crime (64)
- Mass incarceration (63)
- Constitutional Law (62)
- Fifth Amendment (60)
- Search and seizure (59)
- Privacy (58)
- Corrections (57)
- Death penalty (55)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (595)
- Michigan Law Review (267)
- Faculty Scholarship (245)
- Seattle University Law Review (230)
- Articles (150)
-
- Faculty Publications (88)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (71)
- Touro Law Review (67)
- All Faculty Scholarship (64)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (59)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Publications (56)
- Indiana Law Journal (55)
- West Virginia Law Review (55)
- Washington Law Review (54)
- Buffalo Law Review (53)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (52)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (49)
- Cardozo Law Review (48)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (45)
- Cleveland State Law Review (40)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (39)
- Pace Law Review (37)
- Scholarly Articles (36)
- BYU Law Review (35)
- Faculty Articles (35)
- Kentucky Law Journal (35)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (34)
- Journal Articles (33)
- Pepperdine Law Review (33)
- Publication Type
Articles 4081 - 4110 of 5037
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Simmons V. South Carolina 114 S. Ct. 2187 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Simmons V. South Carolina 114 S. Ct. 2187 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Tuilaepa V. California Proctor V. California 114 S. Ct. 2630 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Tuilaepa V. California Proctor V. California 114 S. Ct. 2630 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mcfarland V. Scott 114 S. Ct. 2568 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Mcfarland V. Scott 114 S. Ct. 2568 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Romano V. Oklahoma 114 S. Ct. 2004 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Romano V. Oklahoma 114 S. Ct. 2004 (1994) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Turner V. Williams 35 F.3d 872 (4th Cir. 1994) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Turner V. Williams 35 F.3d 872 (4th Cir. 1994) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mickens V. Commonwealth 247 Va. 395, 442 S.E.2d 678 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Mickens V. Commonwealth 247 Va. 395, 442 S.E.2d 678 (1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Chichester V. Commonwealth 448 S.E.2d 638 (Va. 1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Chichester V. Commonwealth 448 S.E.2d 638 (Va. 1994) Supreme Court Of Virginia
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
If At First You Don't Succeed: The Real And Potential Impact Of Simmons V. South Carolina In Virginia, Barbra Anna Pohl, Cameron P. Turner
If At First You Don't Succeed: The Real And Potential Impact Of Simmons V. South Carolina In Virginia, Barbra Anna Pohl, Cameron P. Turner
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Murder, Capital Punishment, And Deterrence: A Review Of The Evidence And An Examination Of Police Killings., William C. Bailey, Ruth Peterson
Murder, Capital Punishment, And Deterrence: A Review Of The Evidence And An Examination Of Police Killings., William C. Bailey, Ruth Peterson
Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications
This paper reviews and assesses the empirical literature on murder, capital punishment, and deterrence. There is a large body of evidence regarding these issues, with studies yielding a rather consistent pattern of nondeterrence. However, most investigations are limited because they rely upon the general homicide rate as the criterion variable, although both legally and theoretically, different types of murder may be differentially subject to deterrence. As an example of how deterrence investigations may benefit from examining different types of homicide, we conduct a monthly time-series analysis of the possible deterrent effect of the provision for capital punishment, levels of execution, …
Dying To Get Out: A Study On The Necessity, Importance, And Effectiveness Of Prison Early Release Programs For Elderly Inmates And Inmates Suffering From Hiv Disease And Other Terminal-Centered Illnesses, Susan Lundstrom
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
Brutality In Blue: Community, Authority, And The Elusive Promise Of Police Reform, Debra Ann Livingston
Brutality In Blue: Community, Authority, And The Elusive Promise Of Police Reform, Debra Ann Livingston
Michigan Law Review
A Review of Above the Law: Police and the Excessive Use of Force by Jerome H. Skolnick and James J. Fyfe
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
New York's Loyalty To The Spirit Of "Miranda": Simply The Best For Twenty-Five Years, Lorraine J. Adler
Vanderbilt Law Review
The landmark Supreme Court decision Miranda v. Arizona, recognized a defendant's right to be informed of the rights guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause, including the right to counsel. The Miranda Court realized that a suspect may feel compelled to waive his Fifth Amendment privilege while in official detention. The Court held that the police must read the now-familiar warnings to a subject in custodial interrogation before he can waive his rights. Therefore, the Court in Miranda chose to strike the balance between effective law enforcement and protecting a subject's constitutional rights at the point of informing the subject …
Enforcing Corrections-Related Court Orders In The District Of Columbia, Jonathan M. Smith
Enforcing Corrections-Related Court Orders In The District Of Columbia, Jonathan M. Smith
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
In 1909, a presidential commission made the following comment about the conditions that prevailed in the District of Columbia's jail: That men and women should be sent to these narrow and confined cells, the lazy to be fostered in laziness, the industrious to be deprived of every form of employment, in one promiscuous assembly, to corrupt and be corrupted by each other, to be fed like beasts and maintained at the public charge, with no prospect for improvement in condition, with the moral certainty that they will come out far worse than they went in, is a fact that has …
Schiro V. Farley 114 S. Ct. 783 (1994)
Burden V. Zant 114 S. Ct. 654 (1994)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer I) 5 F.3d 758 (4th Cir. 1993)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer I) 5 F.3d 758 (4th Cir. 1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Dixon 14 F.3d 956 (4th Cir. 1994)
Smith V. Dixon 14 F.3d 956 (4th Cir. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Introduction, William S. Geimer
Washington V. Murray 4 F.3d 1285 (4th Cir. 1993)
Washington V. Murray 4 F.3d 1285 (4th Cir. 1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer H) 18 F. 3d 229 (4th Cir. 1994)
Spencer V. Murray (Spencer H) 18 F. 3d 229 (4th Cir. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Swann V. Commonwealth 441 S.E. 2d 195 (Va. 1994)
Swann V. Commonwealth 441 S.E. 2d 195 (Va. 1994)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Ramdass V. Commonwealth 246 Va. 413, 437 S.E.2d 566 (1993)
Ramdass V. Commonwealth 246 Va. 413, 437 S.E.2d 566 (1993)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Confessions And The Mentally Retarded Capital Defendant: Cheating To Lose, Silvia Linda Simpson
Confessions And The Mentally Retarded Capital Defendant: Cheating To Lose, Silvia Linda Simpson
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Overlooked Victories: Techniques For Negotiating Non-Capital Outcomes, Lesley Meredith James
Overlooked Victories: Techniques For Negotiating Non-Capital Outcomes, Lesley Meredith James
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
To Attain The Ends Of Justice: Confronting Virginia's Default Rules In Capital Cases, Michael A. Groot
To Attain The Ends Of Justice: Confronting Virginia's Default Rules In Capital Cases, Michael A. Groot
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Justice Blackmun And The "Failed Experiment", William S. Geimer
Justice Blackmun And The "Failed Experiment", William S. Geimer
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Justice Blackmun's Eighth Amendment Pilgrimage, D. Grier Stephenson Jr.
Justice Blackmun's Eighth Amendment Pilgrimage, D. Grier Stephenson Jr.
Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law
No abstract provided.
The Police And Violent Crime, Joseph D. Mcnamara
The Police And Violent Crime, Joseph D. Mcnamara
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Incorporating The Suspension Clause: Is There A Constitutional Right To Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners?, Jordan Steiker
Incorporating The Suspension Clause: Is There A Constitutional Right To Federal Habeas Corpus For State Prisoners?, Jordan Steiker
Michigan Law Review
In the early 1960s, the Supreme Court adopted generous standards governing federal habeas petitions by state prisoners. At that time, the Court suggested, rather surprisingly, that its solicitude toward such petitions might be constitutionally mandated by the Suspension Clause, the only provision in the Constitution that explicitly refers to the "Writ of Habeas Corpus." Now, thirty years later, the Court has essentially overruled those expansive rulings, and Congress has considered, though not yet enacted, further limitations on the availability of the writ. Despite these significant assaults on the habeas forum, the constitutional argument appears to have been entirely abandoned. The …