Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons^™

Is Punishment Relevant After All? A Prescription For Informing Juries Of The Consequences Of Conviction, Jeffrey Bellin

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

The American jury, once heralded as "the great corrective of law in its actual administration," has suffered numerous setbacks in the modern era. As a result, jurors have largely become bystanders in a criminal justice system that relies on increasingly severe punishments to incarcerate tens of thousands of offenders each year. The overwhelming majority of cases are resolved short of trial and, even when trials occur, jurors are instructed to find only the facts necessary for legal guilt. Apart from this narrow task, jurors need not, in the eyes of the law, concern themselves with whether a conviction and subsequent …

Hope And Betrayal On Death Row, David Cole

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

No abstract provided.

Annotated Bibliography On Independent Prison Oversight, Michele Deitch

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Independent Correctional Oversight Mechanisms Across The United States: A 50-State Inventory, Michele Deitch

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Getting To Yes In A Plra World, Elizabeth Alexander

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Effective Corrections Oversight: What Can We Learn From Aca Standards And Accreditation?, David M. Bogard

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Accrediting The Accreditors: A New Paradigm For Correctional Oversight, Lynn S. Branham

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On A Government Model Of Correctional Oversight, Richard T. Wolf

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ensuring Progress: Accountability Standards Recommended By The National Prison Rape Elimination Commission, Jamie Fellner

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Role Of The Correctional Association Of New York In A New Paradigm Of Prison Monitoring, Jack Beck

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Oversight Of Law Enforcement Is Beneficial And Needed—Both Inside And Out, Barbara Attard

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Civilian Organizations With Prison Access And Citizen Members—The New York Experience, John M. Brickman

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prison Inspection And The Protection Of Prisoners’ Rights, Anne Owers

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Ombudsman As A Monitor Of Human Rights In Canadian Federal Corrections, Howard Sapers, Ivan Zinger

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Role Of Citizens And Non-Profit Advocacy Organizations In Providing Oversight, Vivien Stern

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Importance Of Dialogue And Cooperation In Prison Oversight, Silvia Casale

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Professionalism In Corrections And The Need For External Scrutiny: An International Overview, Andrew Coyle

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Prison Oversight And Prison Leadership, Stan Stojkovic

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Quixotic Dilemma, California’S Immutable Culture Of Incarceration, Geri Lynn Green

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Reflections On 60 Years Of Outside Scrutiny Of Prisons And Prison Policy In The United States, Nicholas De B. Katzenbach

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Distinguishing The Various Functions Of Effective Prison Oversight, Michele Deitch

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

From White Plains To Austin: The Road From The Prison Reform Revisited Conference To The Opening Up A Closed World Conference, Michael B. Mushlin

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

Opening Up A Closed World: What Constitutes Effective Prison Oversight?, Michael B. Mushlin, Michele Deitch

Pace Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Case Study In Achieving The Purpose Of Incapacitation-Based Statutes: The Bail Reform Act Of 1984 And Possession Of Child Pornography, J. Elizabeth Mcbath

William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice

No abstract provided.

Don't Answer The Door: Montejo V. Louisiana Relaxes Police Restrictions For Questioning Non-Custodial Defendants, Emily Bretz

Michigan Law Review

In 2009, the Supreme Court held in Montejo v. Louisiana that a defendant may validly waive his Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogation, even if police initiate interrogation after the defendant's invocation of the right at the first formal proceeding. This Note asserts that Montejo significantly altered the Sixth Amendment protections available to represented defendants. By increasing defendants' exposure to law enforcement, the decision allows police to try to elicit incriminating statements and waivers of the right to counsel after the defendant has expressed a desire for counsel. In order to protect the defendant's constitutional guarantee of a …

From Harmelin To Graham - Justice Kennedy Stakes Out A Path To Proportional Punishment, Eva Nilsen

Faculty Scholarship

Graham v. Florida³ is a groundbreaking decision because it revives punishment doctrine on two issues that have lain dormant since Harmelin v. Michigan⁴: proportionality and individualized sentencing. Although it doesn't overrule Harmelin, by recognizing the continued vitality of Weems⁵ and Solem ⁶ the Graham decision appears to acknowledge that the Court's approach to proportionality since Harmelin may be too restrictive for the U.S. justice system today. In Solem, the Court affirmed its Constitutional role in ensuring just punishment; in Graham, the Court reaffirms that role.

Harmelin has had an enormous and regrettable impact …

Receiverships In The Prison Litigation Context: Factors Necessary For An Effective Judicial Remedy Of Last Resort, Liat Weingart

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

This note examines the effectiveness of judicial receiverships as a last-resort remedy in institutional reform litigation, particularly in the context of prison systems. It argues that the success of receiverships depends on the court's ability to supervise effectively and ensure the receiver's independence from political influence. The analysis highlights that appointing executive agents as receivers often leads to conflicts of interest, undermining the remedy's effectiveness, and emphasizes the need for robust supervisory structures, such as Special Masters, to ensure accountability and alignment with court objectives.

Venus In Furs: Why False Confessions Are True, Ibpp Editor

International Bulletin of Political Psychology

The author discusses the nature of truth and false confessions in the context of confession and interrogation.

A Breeding Ground For Communicable Disease: What To Do About Public Health Hazards In New York Prisons, Claire Fortin

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.

"Ordinary Citizens" Or A License To Kill? The Turn To Law In Regulating Britain's Intelligence Services, Simon Chesterman

Buffalo Public Interest Law Journal

No abstract provided.