Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (70)
- Criminal Procedure (62)
- Fourth Amendment (43)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Evidence (25)
-
- Courts (12)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (9)
- Fourteenth Amendment (6)
- Legal History (6)
- Law and Race (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Judges (3)
- Privacy Law (3)
- Communications Law (2)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Housing Law (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Internet Law (1)
- Juvenile Law (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Institution
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Articles (25)
- Michigan Law Review (24)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (15)
- Book Chapters (9)
- Publications (5)
-
- Michigan Law Review First Impressions (3)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (2)
- Michigan Telecommunications & Technology Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (1)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review Online (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Caveat (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 95 of 95
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
'Custodial Interrogation' Within The Meaning Of Miranda, Yale Kamisar
'Custodial Interrogation' Within The Meaning Of Miranda, Yale Kamisar
Book Chapters
The primary conceptual hurdle confronting the Miranda Court was the "legal reasoning" that any and all police interrogation is unaffected by the privilege against self-incrimination because such interrogation does not involve any kind of judicial process for the taking of testimony; inasmuch as police officers have no legal authority to compel statements of any kind, there is no legal obligation, ran the argument, to which a privilege can apply. See, e.g., the discussion and authorities collected in Kamisar, A Dissent from the Miranda Dissents: Some Comments on the "New" Fifth Amendment and the Old "Voluntariness" Test, 65 MICH. L. REv. …
Do Police Sometimes Practice 'Civil Disobedience', Too?, Yale Kamisar
Do Police Sometimes Practice 'Civil Disobedience', Too?, Yale Kamisar
Articles
In a recent address, Mr. Joseph J. Casper, Assistant Director of the FBI, asserted that "a society living under the rule of law cannot permit persons to choose the Jaws which they will obey and the Jaws which they will break." But on reading the rest of his speech, one wonders whether he would strenuously object if the police were permitted to select the laws which they must obey and those they may disregard.
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Police Interrogation And The Supreme Court--The Latest Round, Jerold H. Israel
Book Chapters
My first task is to explain to some degree the nature of the problem embodied in our title. This book has been designated as "Escobedo-The Second Round." What we will be discussing is a series of cases, decided in June, 1966, the most noteworthy of which is Miranda v. Arizona [384 U.S. 436 (1966)]. In these cases, the United States Supreme Court prescribed a new set of standards governing the introduction in evidence of statements obtained from the defendant through police interrogation. Actually, to a degree these standards were not entirely new. They had been suggested, at least in part, …
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
The Citizen On Trial: The New Confession Rules, Yale Kamisar
Articles
Commenting on why it has taken the United States so long to apply "the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to counsel to the proceedings in the stationhouse as well as to those in the courtroom" - as the Supreme Court did in Miranda v. Arizona - this author notes that, "To a large extent this is so because here, as elsewhere, there has been a wide gap between the principles to which we aspire and the practices we actually employ."
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
A Dissent From The Miranda Dissents: Some Comments On The 'New' Fifth Amendment And The Old 'Voluntariness' Test, Yale Kamisar
Articles
F the several conferences and workshops (and many lunch conversations) on police interrogation and confessions in which I have participated this past summer3 are any indication, Miranda v. Arizona' has evoked much anger and spread much sorrow among judges, lawyers and professors. In the months and years ahead, such reaction is likely to be translated into microscopic analyses and relentless, probing criticism of the majority opinion. During this period of agonizing appraisal and reappraisal, I think it important that various assumptions and assertions in the dissenting opinions do not escape attention.