Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Procedure (73)
- Criminal Law (37)
- Fourteenth Amendment (27)
- Constitutional Law (24)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (11)
-
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Law and Society (5)
- Courts (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (3)
- Law and Race (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Sociology (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Criminology (2)
- Disability Law (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Fourth Amendment (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Law and Philosophy (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (2)
- Common Law (1)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (1)
- Education (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Institution
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (144)
- University of Baltimore Law (17)
- University of Michigan Law School (8)
- Columbia Law School (6)
- St. Mary's University (5)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Cleveland State University (3)
- California State University, San Bernardino (1)
- Louisiana State University (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (1)
- Old Dominion University (1)
- San Jose State University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Capital Defense Journal (134)
- All Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Faculty Articles (5)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (5)
-
- Scholarly Articles (4)
- Articles (3)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
- Cleveland State Law Review (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (2)
- Washington and Lee Law Review Online (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications, School of Management (1)
- Faculty Works (1)
- Institute for the Humanities Theses (1)
- Northwestern Journal of Law & Social Policy (1)
- Publications (1)
- Sociology & Criminology Faculty Publications (1)
- Theses Digitization Project (1)
- Touro Law Review (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 181 - 198 of 198
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Murray V. Giarrantano 109 S. Ct. 2765, 106 L. Ed. 2d 713 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Murray V. Giarrantano 109 S. Ct. 2765, 106 L. Ed. 2d 713 (1989) United States Supreme Court
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Waye V. Townley 871 F.2d 18 (4th Cir. 1989) United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth Circuit
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Spencer V. Commonwealth Supreme Court Of Virginia Spencer I (Victim-Tucker): 1989 Va. Lexis 147, Wl 109529 (1989) And Spencer Ii (Victim-Davis): 1989 Va. Lexis 127, Wl 109530 (1989)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Buchanan V. Commonwealth 1989 Wl 109169 (Va.) Supreme Court Of Virginia No. 890107, 890108 September 22, 1989
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Restrictions On The State's Use Of Mental Health Experts In Capital Trials, W. Lawrence Fitch
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Clanton V. Muncy 845 F.2d 1238 (4th Cir. 1988)
Clanton V. Muncy 845 F.2d 1238 (4th Cir. 1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Capital Jury Selection In Virginia, William S. Geimer
Capital Jury Selection In Virginia, William S. Geimer
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Hyman V. Alken 824 F.2d 1405 (4th Cir. 1987)
Hyman V. Alken 824 F.2d 1405 (4th Cir. 1987)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Clanton V. Bair 826 F.2d 1354 (4th Cir. 1987)
Clanton V. Bair 826 F.2d 1354 (4th Cir. 1987)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Giarratano V. Murray 847 F.2d 1118 (4th Cir. 1988)
Giarratano V. Murray 847 F.2d 1118 (4th Cir. 1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Mcdowell V. Dixon No. 61328 (4th Cir. (N.C.) June 21, 1988)
Mcdowell V. Dixon No. 61328 (4th Cir. (N.C.) June 21, 1988)
Capital Defense Journal
No abstract provided.
Yates V. Aiken 108 S.Ct. 534 (1988)
Amadeo V. Zant 108 S.Ct 1771 (1988)
In Favor Of Capital Punishment: A Blending Of Philosophical Perspectives, James Charles Donnelly
In Favor Of Capital Punishment: A Blending Of Philosophical Perspectives, James Charles Donnelly
Institute for the Humanities Theses
There has been little intellectual support for the average American's view of the proper relationship between L' crime and punishment. This text is an effort to philosophically define and defend this view. Chapters one and two deal with teleological theories and justification for systems and rules of practices. I first discuss the historical relationship of man to the state, showing the necessity of and providing a basis for civil authority and law and showing both to be based on social utility. This accomplished, a teleological justification of a system of punishment is presented. Chapter three discusses retribution as the deontological …
Administering The Death Penalty
Commentary: Rummel V. Estelle: Mockingbirds Among The Brethren, Kenneth Lasson
Commentary: Rummel V. Estelle: Mockingbirds Among The Brethren, Kenneth Lasson
All Faculty Scholarship
In this commentary Professor Lasson discusses the Supreme Court's decision in Rummel v. Estelle and reveals a poignant personal memorandum that reflects the analysis of human values necessarily performed by whichever Justice cast the deciding vote.
Eighth Amendment Challenges To The Death Penalty: The Relevance Of Informed Public Opinion, Charles W. Thomas
Eighth Amendment Challenges To The Death Penalty: The Relevance Of Informed Public Opinion, Charles W. Thomas
Vanderbilt Law Review
In light of the Court's recent holding in Gregg v. Georgia, future death penalty challenges almost certainly will focus upon the type and quality of evidence available to serve as "objective indicia that reflect the public attitude toward a given sanction."'" Unfortunately, the "objective indicia" that can be relied upon and the manner in which they are to be weighted is not altogether clear. In Gregg, for example, the Court emphasized such traditional considerations as legislative enactments, decisions rendered by juries, and the single post-Furman referendum on the death penalty.'" Additionally, evidence pertaining to the determinants of public support for …
Should Ohio Abolish Capital Punishment, Richard J. Goetz
Should Ohio Abolish Capital Punishment, Richard J. Goetz
Cleveland State Law Review
In view of all the controversy surrounding this topic, it is interesting to review the history of the death penalty in Ohio, in other states, and elsewhere in the world.