Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons^™

Reply To Daniel Polsby, Samuel R. Gross

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Pain Of Punishment, Markus Dirk Dubber

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Wages Of Ambivalence: On The Context And Prospects Of New York's Death Penalty, Franklin E. Zimring

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

New York Statute As Cultural Document: Seeking The Morally Optimal Death Penalty, Robert Weisberg

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federalizing Death, George Kannar

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Jury Responsibility In Capital Sentencing: An Empirical Study, Theodore Eisenberg, Stephen P. Garvey, Martin T. Wells

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Introduction, William S. Geimer, Scott E. Sundby

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Sheppard V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 379, 464 S.E.2d 131 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Maximizing Your Potential: The Effective Use Of Co-Counsel In A Capital Case, Courtney S. Townes

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Fry V. Commonwealth 250 Va. 413, 463 S.E.2d 433 (1995) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Litigating Jury Issues In Capital Trials: Constitutional Law And Virginia Procedures, Paula Dyan Effle

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Dna Evidence In Virginia, Steven M. Johnson

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Daubert And The Use Of Experts In Virginia Capital Cases, J. Conrad Garcia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Turner V. Jabe 58 F.3d 924 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Townes V. Murray 68 F.3d 84 (4th Cir. 1995) United States Court Of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Roach V. Commonwealth 1996 Wl 88107 (Va. 1996) Supreme Court Of Virginia

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Taking The Offensive: Proactive Use Of The Rules Of Evidence, Angela Dale Fields

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

Challenging The Future Dangerousness Aggravating Factor, Michael H. Spencer

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

What To Do When You're Ambushed By Undisclosed Evidence Of Unadjudicated Acts To Show Future Dangerousness, Douglas S. Collica

Capital Defense Journal

No abstract provided.

The Meaning Of The "Unnecessary Rigor" Provision In The Utah Constitution, James G. Mclaren

Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law

No abstract provided.

A Double-Barrelled Assault: How Technology And Judicial Interpretations Threaten Public Access To Law Enforcement Records, Jamison S. Prime

Federal Communications Law Journal

Recently, an explosion of media coverage has revealed gross misconduct on the part of many police officers in the United States. From Rodney King to Mark Furman, the events have raised grave questions about whether existing checks against police misconduct are effective. Yet, at this crucial period, technological advances and judicial interpretations undermine the ability of the public to access police records. The Author argues that most Freedom of Information (FOI) statutes provide inadequate access to police records in light of technological advances and narrow judicial interpretations of FOI statutes.

Faith In Fantasy: The Supreme Court's Reliance On Commutation To Ensure Justice In Death Penalty Cases, Victoria J. Palacios

Vanderbilt Law Review

Since scarcely a decade after Furman v. Georgia,' the Supreme Court has struggled to avoid review of death penalty cases by narrowing the grounds defendants can use to challenge their sentences, as well as the procedures they can use to make those challenges. The Court supports its jurisprudence and the deregulation of death with an important but unexamined assumption: whatever shortcomings exist in the administration of the death penalty, ultimately injustice can and will be avoided by the exercise of the commutation power at the state level.

This Article argues that such an assumption is unwarranted. By substituting the fantasy …

Consistently Inconsistent: The Supreme Court And The Confusion Surrounding Proportionality In Non-Capital Sentencing, Steven P. Grossman

All Faculty Scholarship

(Adapted by permission from 84 Ky. L. J. 107 (1995)) This article examines the Supreme Court's treatment of the Eighth Amendment with respect to claims of excessiveness regarding prison sentences. Specifically, it addresses the issue of whether and to what degree the Eighth Amendment requires that a punishment not be disproportional to the crime punished. In analyzing all of the modern holdings of the Court in this area, one finds significant fault with each. The result of this series of flawed opinions from the Supreme Court is that the state of the law with respect to proportionality in sentencing is …

Survey On The Seriousness Of Crime: A Comparison Of Three Police Departments, Terry J. Comnick

Theses Digitization Project

No abstract provided.

Ua12/8 Chief News, Wku Police

WKU Administration Documents

WKU Police departmental newsletters for 1996.

Fact-Bargaining: An American Phenomenon, William T. Pizzi

Publications

No abstract provided.

When The Constable Blunders: A Comparison Of The Law Of Police Interrogation In Canada And The United States, Robert Harvie, Hamar Foster

Seattle University Law Review

This Article explores the Supreme Court of Canada's use of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in limiting police interrogations and compares its case decisions with cases from the Supreme Court of the United States. Part II of this Article examines the purposes and policies underlying sections 10(b), 7, and 24(2) of the Charter. Part III then examines the application of sections 10(b) and 7 in situations where (1) suspects are interrogated by uniformed police officers or other persons known to be in authority, and (2) suspects are interrogated surreptitiously by persons not known to be in authority. In both …

(Dis)Assembling Rights Of Women Workers Along The Global Assembly Line: Human Rights And The Garment Industry Symposium: Political Lawyering: Conversations On Progressive Social Change, Laura Ho, Catherine Powell, Leti Volpp

Faculty Scholarship

Some observers would like to explain away sweatshops as immigrants exploiting other immigrants, as "cultural, or as the importation of a form of exploitation that normally does not happen here but occurs elsewhere, in the "Third World." While the public was shocked by the discovery at El Monte, garment workers and garment worker advocates have for years been describing abuses in the garment industry and have ascribed responsibility for such abuses to manufacturers and retailers who control the industry. Sweatshops, like the one in El Monte, are a home-grown problem with peculiarly American roots. Since the inception of the garment …

Shaking The Foundation Of Gideon: A Critique Of Nichols In Overruling Baldasar V. Illinois, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 507 (1996), Ralph Ruebner, Jennifer Berner, Anne Herbert

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Pretextual Traffic Stops: United States V. Whren And The Death Of Terry V. Ohio, Janet Koven Levit

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.