Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (45)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Constitutional Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Human Rights Law (5)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- International Law (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Law and Race (2)
- Natural Resources Law (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- Sexuality and the Law (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Computer Engineering (1)
- Engineering (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Amendment (1)
- Immigration Law (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Prison reform (19)
- Prisons (12)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (6)
- New York (6)
- Prisoners (5)
-
- Corrections (4)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (3)
- Criminal justice (3)
- Oversight (3)
- Prison oversight (3)
- Civil Rights (2)
- Constitutional Law (2)
- Crime (2)
- Criminal law (2)
- Death penalty (2)
- Gender (2)
- Juvenile justice (2)
- Law enforcement (2)
- Mass incarceration (2)
- Police (2)
- Police violence (2)
- Prisoners rights (2)
- Race (2)
- Reform (2)
- Social media (2)
- Women prisoners (2)
- ABA (1)
- ABA Standards and Treatment of Prisoners (1)
- ACA (1)
- Adolescents (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 61 of 61
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Abscam, The Judiciary, And The Ethics Of Entrapment, Bennett L. Gershman
Abscam, The Judiciary, And The Ethics Of Entrapment, Bennett L. Gershman
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Part I of this Article surveys the development of the competing threads of entrapment theory. Part II shows how these theories were applied in the Abscam prosecutions. Part III turns to the predisposition test and demonstrates its analytical flaws and its ineffectiveness in restraining he improper use of inducements in undercover investigations. Part IV offers specific suggestions for a federal entrapment statute to remedy these defects. The statute allows an entrapment defense where the undercover techniques used fall outside a narrowly defined range of permissible conduct. If the government's conduct is permissible, the statute nevertheless requires the decision-maker to examine …