Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (226)
- University of Michigan Law School (129)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (64)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (63)
- Columbia Law School (60)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (53)
- UIC School of Law (47)
- American University Washington College of Law (45)
- Pace University (45)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (34)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (31)
- University of Colorado Law School (31)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (30)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (25)
- Georgetown University Law Center (24)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (24)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (24)
- West Virginia University (23)
- Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Georgia State University College of Law (21)
- New York Law School (19)
- University of Baltimore Law (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (18)
- Pepperdine University (18)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (18)
- Boston University School of Law (17)
- Fordham Law School (17)
- St. John's University School of Law (17)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (17)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (111)
- Police (103)
- Criminal justice (77)
- Sentencing (72)
- Incarceration (59)
-
- Law enforcement (56)
- Prisons (55)
- Punishment (54)
- Criminal Law (49)
- Fourth Amendment (49)
- Evidence (41)
- Prison (41)
- Race (41)
- Policing (39)
- Death penalty (38)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Constitution (37)
- Mass incarceration (37)
- Crime (36)
- Law Enforcement (34)
- Prison reform (33)
- Prisoners (32)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (31)
- Supreme Court (31)
- Criminal procedure (30)
- Criminal justice reform (29)
- Law (29)
- Recidivism (29)
- Corrections (27)
- Rehabilitation (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (223)
- Faculty Scholarship (115)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- UIC Law Review (38)
- Touro Law Review (37)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Articles (34)
- Publications (30)
- Pace Law Review (29)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Buffalo Law Review (25)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (24)
- West Virginia Law Review (23)
- ProAcademy (22)
- Faculty Publications (21)
- Cardozo Law Review (20)
- Georgia State University Law Review (19)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (18)
- Pepperdine Law Review (18)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (16)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (16)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (16)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (16)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (14)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (14)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (13)
- Cleveland State Law Review (12)
- Faculty Articles (12)
- Faculty Works (12)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1471 - 1500 of 1608
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
Crime, Punishment And Responsibility, T. Brian Hogan
Crime, Punishment And Responsibility, T. Brian Hogan
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
The Repressed Issues Of Sentencing: Accountability, Predictability, And Equality In The Era Of The Sentencing Commission, John C. Coffee Jr.
The Repressed Issues Of Sentencing: Accountability, Predictability, And Equality In The Era Of The Sentencing Commission, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
The existence of disparities in the sentences imposed on equally culpable offenders has long been a subject of jurisprudential concern. The author provides a critique of recent efforts to objectify the sentencing process that rely on a matrix table prescribing guideline sentence lengths on the basis of offense severity and predictions of recidivism. With particular emphasis on the Sentencing Commission authorized by pending federal legislation, he urges the need for political accountability in the body that inevitably makes value judgments in the preparation and administration of such a guideline system. Finally, the author discusses the normative issues that surround the …
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Frederic L. Faust
". . . We Are The Living Proof . . . ", Frederic L. Faust
Florida State University Law Review
By David Fogel. Cincinnati, Ohio: The W. H. Anderson Co. 1975. Pp. xxi, 328. $9.50.
An Historical Analysis Of Mandatory Capital Punishment, James T. Bryan Iii
An Historical Analysis Of Mandatory Capital Punishment, James T. Bryan Iii
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Due Process In Parole Granting: A Current Assessment, 10 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 93 (1976), Frank S. Merritt
Due Process In Parole Granting: A Current Assessment, 10 J. Marshall J. Prac. & Proc. 93 (1976), Frank S. Merritt
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Comment On Structure And Theory, Jerome Hall
Comment On Structure And Theory, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Criminal Redistribution Of Stolen Property: The Need For Law Reform, G. Robert Blakey, Michael Goldsmith
Criminal Redistribution Of Stolen Property: The Need For Law Reform, G. Robert Blakey, Michael Goldsmith
Journal Articles
The development of sophisticated fencing systems for the sale of stolen property to consumers has paralleled the industrialization of society. Although crimes against property and attempts to control them have ancient origins, most theft before the Industrial Revolution was committed for immediate consumption by the thieves and their accomplices rather than for redistribution in the market-place. Society's small population, inadequate transportation and communication systems, and technological inability to mass produce identical goods constrained large-scale fencing because there were few buyers and because stolen property could be readily identified. The unprecedented economic and demographic growth in eighteenth-century Europe, however, removed these …
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
The Street Perspective: A Conversation With The Police, Patrick L. Baude
IUSTITIA
Professor Baude's purpose in this discussion is to elicit police officers' comments on what members of the legal profession ought to know about the influence of the "street perspective" in shaping those officers' attitudes towards the criminal justice system and the role they play in it. It is police insistence on the broad validity of insights which only "the street" can provide that accounts for the considerable gulf between "front-line" enforcement officers and other functionaries in (and students of) that system. Law students (and no doubt lawyers) seem uncomfortable with the notion that our system cannot adequately be understood without …
The Systems Approach To Criminal Justice Administration, John Hartje
The Systems Approach To Criminal Justice Administration, John Hartje
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Parole Revocation In North Carolina: The Arrest Of A Parole Violator, Robert J. Robbins Jr.
Parole Revocation In North Carolina: The Arrest Of A Parole Violator, Robert J. Robbins Jr.
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Law And Legal Impact Of Contraceptive Use By Minors In North Carolina, Donald M. Wright
The Law And Legal Impact Of Contraceptive Use By Minors In North Carolina, Donald M. Wright
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Eighth Amendment, Beccaria, And The Enlightenment: An Historical Justification For The Weems V. United States Excessive Punishment Doctrine, Deborah A. Schwartz, Jay Wishingrad
The Eighth Amendment, Beccaria, And The Enlightenment: An Historical Justification For The Weems V. United States Excessive Punishment Doctrine, Deborah A. Schwartz, Jay Wishingrad
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The North Carolina Penal System: Needed Reform, Charles E. Vickery
The North Carolina Penal System: Needed Reform, Charles E. Vickery
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Procedure--Recidivism--Constitutionality Of The West Virginia Recidivist Statute, Cynthia L. Turco
Criminal Procedure--Recidivism--Constitutionality Of The West Virginia Recidivist Statute, Cynthia L. Turco
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Standards For Accepting Guilty Pleas To Misdemeanor Charges, Richard A. Kopek
Standards For Accepting Guilty Pleas To Misdemeanor Charges, Richard A. Kopek
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The guilty plea-not the trial-is the most common manner of disposing of criminal cases in America. It has been estimated that 90 percent of all convictions and 95 percent of misdemeanor convictions are the result of guilty pleas. Various reasons have been advanced to explain this heavy reliance on the guilty plea. For example, it avoids the drain on judicial resources that would occur if all cases had to be tried. In addition, it eliminates the risks and uncertainties of trials and permits flexibility in sentencing. Because of the prevalence of guilty pleas, there must be procedural safeguards to insure …
The Future Of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues In The Individualization Of Justice, John C. Coffee Jr.
The Future Of Sentencing Reform: Emerging Legal Issues In The Individualization Of Justice, John C. Coffee Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
The dilemma of the American sentencing judge is qualitatively unique. Because our system of criminal justice has embraced to a degree unequaled elsewhere the rehabilitative ideal that punishment should fit not the crime, but the particular criminal, the sentencing judge must labor to fulfill the dual and sometimes conflicting roles of judge and clinician. Entrusted with enormous discretion, he is expected to "individualize" the sentence he imposes to suit the character, social history, and potential for recidivism of the offender before him. Yet, because of the general absence in our Sentencing Reform system of meaningful procedures for the appellate review …
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Parole Revocation And The Right To Counsel, Paul W. Grimm
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
State V. Dix: Common Law Kidnapping Requires A Substantial Asportation And An Increased Risk Of Harm, North Carolina Central Law Review
State V. Dix: Common Law Kidnapping Requires A Substantial Asportation And An Increased Risk Of Harm, North Carolina Central Law Review
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Realistic Preparation For Life Outside Prison, Terry M. Luce
Realistic Preparation For Life Outside Prison, Terry M. Luce
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Elevation Of Entrapment To A Constitutional Defense, Robert H. Thomson Iii
Elevation Of Entrapment To A Constitutional Defense, Robert H. Thomson Iii
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
The issue of entrapment arises initially as a defense when a person is accused of committing a criminal act in which government agents solicited, and perhaps actively participated in, the conduct for which the defendant stands accused. Classic entrapment situations occur when law enforcement officers, through agents or informers, solicit an illegal transaction, such as the sale of contraband. The evidence thereby obtained is used to support the prosecution of the individual accepting the solicitation. Solicitation is an important technique of law enforcement because evidence of illegal transactions is often impossible to obtain by other methods. Certain uses of solicitation …
Sentencing: The Probation Officer, James Lowenthal
Sentencing: The Probation Officer, James Lowenthal
IUSTITIA
Sentencing offenders of the criminal law is a widely diverse and complex problem. Few guidelines are available for those upon whom the task has been thrust. Depending upon the jurisdiction, various parties are responsible for sentence determination: juries, administrative agencies, legislatures, and judges. Most jurisdictions, however, require the judge to make the final determination.' To aid in this determination, many jurisdictions, including federal district courts, require or permit judges to consider a presentence investigation report prepared by a professional probation officer. The use of these reports and recommendations are generally limited to felony cases or to specific crimes where probation …
Corrections Law—Right To Counsel At Preliminary Parole Revocation Hearings In New York State To Be Determined By The Parole Board On Case-By-Case Basis., Peggy Rabkin
Buffalo Law Review
People ex rel. Galloway v. Skinner, 33 N.Y.2d 23, 300 N.E.2d 716, 347 N.Y.S.2d 178 (1973).
Perennial Problems Of Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
Perennial Problems Of Criminal Law, Jerome Hall
Articles by Maurer Faculty
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—Court Orders Broad Relief To Inmates Throughout The Virginia Penal System Where Constitutional Rights Have Been Violated., Arthur H. Ackerhalt
Criminal Law—Court Orders Broad Relief To Inmates Throughout The Virginia Penal System Where Constitutional Rights Have Been Violated., Arthur H. Ackerhalt
Buffalo Law Review
Landman v. Royster, 333 F. Supp. 621 (E.D. Va. 1971).
Prison Crisis Litigation: Problems And Suggestions, William E. Hellerstein, Barbara A. Shapiro
Prison Crisis Litigation: Problems And Suggestions, William E. Hellerstein, Barbara A. Shapiro
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privacy, Autonomy, And Dignity In The Prison: A Preliminary Inquiry Concerning Constitutional Aspects Of The Degradation Process In Our Prisons, Richard G. Singer
Privacy, Autonomy, And Dignity In The Prison: A Preliminary Inquiry Concerning Constitutional Aspects Of The Degradation Process In Our Prisons, Richard G. Singer
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prediction Of Criminal Conduct And Preventive Confinement Of Convicted Persons, Andrew Von Hirsch
Prediction Of Criminal Conduct And Preventive Confinement Of Convicted Persons, Andrew Von Hirsch
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prisons—State Must Devise System Ensuring Indigent Prisoner's Meaningful Access To The Courts, Robert E. White
Prisons—State Must Devise System Ensuring Indigent Prisoner's Meaningful Access To The Courts, Robert E. White
Buffalo Law Review
Gilmore v. Lynch, 319 F. Supp. 105 (N.D. Cal. 1970), aff'd sub nom. Younger v. Gilmore, 92 S. Ct. 250 (1971).
The Discovery Of Prison Reform, Fred Cohen
Incarcerating The Innocent: Pretrial Detention In Our Nation's Jails, Mike Place, David A. Sands
Incarcerating The Innocent: Pretrial Detention In Our Nation's Jails, Mike Place, David A. Sands
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.