Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (226)
- University of Michigan Law School (129)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (64)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (63)
- Columbia Law School (60)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (53)
- UIC School of Law (47)
- American University Washington College of Law (45)
- Pace University (45)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (34)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (31)
- University of Colorado Law School (31)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (30)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (25)
- Georgetown University Law Center (24)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (24)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (24)
- West Virginia University (23)
- Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (22)
- St. Mary's University (22)
- Georgia State University College of Law (21)
- New York Law School (19)
- University of Baltimore Law (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (18)
- Pepperdine University (18)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (18)
- Boston University School of Law (17)
- Fordham Law School (17)
- St. John's University School of Law (17)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (17)
- Keyword
-
- Criminal law (111)
- Police (103)
- Criminal justice (77)
- Sentencing (72)
- Incarceration (59)
-
- Law enforcement (56)
- Prisons (55)
- Punishment (54)
- Criminal Law (49)
- Fourth Amendment (49)
- Evidence (41)
- Prison (41)
- Race (41)
- Policing (39)
- Death penalty (38)
- Capital punishment (37)
- Constitution (37)
- Mass incarceration (37)
- Crime (36)
- Law Enforcement (34)
- Prison reform (33)
- Prisoners (32)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (31)
- Supreme Court (31)
- Criminal procedure (30)
- Criminal justice reform (29)
- Law (29)
- Recidivism (29)
- Corrections (27)
- Rehabilitation (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (223)
- Faculty Scholarship (115)
- Michigan Law Review (59)
- UIC Law Review (38)
- Touro Law Review (37)
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Articles (34)
- Publications (30)
- Pace Law Review (29)
- Scholarly Articles (26)
- Buffalo Law Review (25)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (24)
- West Virginia Law Review (23)
- ProAcademy (22)
- Faculty Publications (21)
- Cardozo Law Review (20)
- Georgia State University Law Review (19)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (18)
- Pepperdine Law Review (18)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (16)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (16)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (16)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (16)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (16)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (14)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (14)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (13)
- Cleveland State Law Review (12)
- Faculty Articles (12)
- Faculty Works (12)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1291 - 1320 of 1608
Full-Text Articles in Law Enforcement and Corrections
The Illinois Death Penalty: What Went Wrong?, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (2001), Marshall J. Hartman, Stephen L. Richards
The Illinois Death Penalty: What Went Wrong?, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 409 (2001), Marshall J. Hartman, Stephen L. Richards
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
Procedural Reforms In Capital Cases Applied To Perjury, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 453 (2001), Steven Clark
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Something Is Rotten In The Interrogation Room: Let's Try Video Oversight, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (2001), Wayne T. Westling
Something Is Rotten In The Interrogation Room: Let's Try Video Oversight, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 537 (2001), Wayne T. Westling
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reflections On When "We, The People" Kill, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 713 (2001), Michael P. Seng
Reflections On When "We, The People" Kill, 34 J. Marshall L. Rev. 713 (2001), Michael P. Seng
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Why Do People Support Capital Punishment? The Death Penalty As Community Ritual, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 765 (2001), Donald L. Beschle
Why Do People Support Capital Punishment? The Death Penalty As Community Ritual, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 765 (2001), Donald L. Beschle
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Guns, Crime, And Punishment In America, Bernard E. Harcourt
Guns, Crime, And Punishment In America, Bernard E. Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
There are over 200 million firearms in private hands in the United States, more than a third of which are handguns. In 1993 alone, it is estimated that 1.3 million victims of serious violent crime faced an offender with a gun. In 1999, there were approximately 563,000 such victims. Estimates of defensive uses of firearms – situations where individuals used a gun to protect themselves, someone else, or their property – range from 65,000 to 2.5 million per year. Punishments for crimes committed with a firearm are severe: under the federal firearms enhancement statute, the mandatory minimum sentence for use …
"Project Exile" And The Allocation Of Federal Law Enforcement Authority, Daniel Richman
"Project Exile" And The Allocation Of Federal Law Enforcement Authority, Daniel Richman
Faculty Scholarship
With each report of violent crime statistics (whether rising or falling) or of the latest firearms outrage, we hear the antiphony of the gun control debate. Advocates of increased federal regulation decry the inadequacies of a regime that permits relatively free access to firearms and argue that the availability of guns is itself a spur to more deadly violence. Advocates of minimal regulation, for their part, condemn measures that, they say, will primarily penalize law-abiding citizens, and instead call for more vigorous enforcement of existing laws, targeting "criminals," not their weapons. When the antiphony intrudes on funerals, the effect can …
The Doctrine Of Non-Inquiry And The Preservation Of Human Rights:-Is There Room For Reconciliation?, Michael S. Topiel
The Doctrine Of Non-Inquiry And The Preservation Of Human Rights:-Is There Room For Reconciliation?, Michael S. Topiel
Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law
The note explores the tension between individual human rights under international law and state interests in combating cross-border crime, focusing on the doctrine of noninquiry in extradition cases. It argues that while the Convention Against Torture imposes obligations to prevent extradition to situations of torture, the doctrine of noninquiry—where courts avoid scrutinizing the requesting state’s justice system—remains crucial for maintaining separation of powers and diplomatic relations. The analysis highlights the balancing act between protecting human rights and ensuring international cooperation in law enforcement.
Book Review, David S. Tanenhaus
Book Review, David S. Tanenhaus
Scholarly Works
This ambitious book impressively chronicles forms of imprisonment in American history from Columbus’s crossing in 1492, with at least four convicts among his crew, to the rise of five hundred years later of a “prison-industrial complex,” which employs over half a million people and incarcerates more than one million others. According to Christianson, a former investigative reporter and gubernatorial aide who is now contributing editor of The Criminal Law Bulletin, director of the New York Death Penalty Documentation Project, and chairman of the Board of the Safer Society Foundation, With Liberty for Some “is a history of how we …
The Boynton Beach Juvenile First Offender Program: Does It Really Work?, Andrew M. Rosenberg
The Boynton Beach Juvenile First Offender Program: Does It Really Work?, Andrew M. Rosenberg
Graduate Student Dissertations, Theses, Capstones, and Portfolios
-
As Freedom Advances: The Paradox Of Severity In American Criminal Justice, David Cole
As Freedom Advances: The Paradox Of Severity In American Criminal Justice, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
According to the Enlightenment philosopher Montesquieu, "as freedom advances, the severity of the penal law decreases."' Montesquieu's notion is in the United States Constitution's Eighth Amendment, a provision that reflects a Montesquieuan faith that punishments acceptable today will become cruel and unusual tomorrow. Yet the United States in the year 2000 presents a serious challenge to Montesquieu's notion of the progress of freedom. The United States is simultaneously a leader of the "free world" and of the incarcerated world. We celebrate and export our commitment to free markets, civil rights, and civil liberties, yet we are also a world leader …
Formalism, Realism, And The War On Drugs, David Cole
Formalism, Realism, And The War On Drugs, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
One of the ways our legal system has avoided confronting this ugly reality is through a commitment to legal formalism. Legal formalism allows us to ignore the social determinants that my AUSA friend saw every day as he prosecuted federal drug cases. As my colleague Professor Michael Seidman has suggested, legal formalism, which has been effectively critiqued and displaced by legal realism in many other areas of law, continues to exercise considerable influence over the way we think about criminal law. This formalist approach, in my view, has strongly affected the way we approach the drug problem. One consequence is …
Joel Feinberg On Crime And Punishment: Exploring The Relationship Between The Moral Limits Of The Criminal Law And The Expressive Function Of Punishment, Bernard Harcourt
Joel Feinberg On Crime And Punishment: Exploring The Relationship Between The Moral Limits Of The Criminal Law And The Expressive Function Of Punishment, Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
When I was originally approached to participate in this Symposium on the work and legacy of Joel Feinberg, I immediately began thinking about the influence of his essay The Expressive Function of Punishment on contemporary criminal law theory in the United States. That essay has contributed significantly to a growing body of scholarship associated with the resurgence of interest inexpressive theories of law. In the criminal law area, the expressivist movement traces directly and foremost to Feinberg's essay. As Carol Steiker observes, "Joel Feinberg can be credited with inaugurating the "expressivist" turn in punishment theory with his influential essay, The …
"Ready? Induce. Sting!": Arguing For The Government's Burden Of Proving Readiness In Entrapment Cases, David D. Tawil
"Ready? Induce. Sting!": Arguing For The Government's Burden Of Proving Readiness In Entrapment Cases, David D. Tawil
Michigan Law Review
For over 100 years the United States judiciary has struggled with the sting and the entrapment defense, examining whether government agents deviously manufacture crimes or merely afford criminals the opportunity to commit them. The sentiments of Justice Holmes were rare for his time, but today they are reflected in a growing sympathy for sting victims. While courts are now more willing than ever to find entrapment, they still differ over the burden of proof that the government must satisfy to overthrow an entrapment defense. Specifically, courts disagree about whether the burden includes proof that the defendant had the ability and …
Breaking The Code Of Silence: Rediscovering "Custom" In Section 1983 Municipal Liability, Myriam E. Gilles
Breaking The Code Of Silence: Rediscovering "Custom" In Section 1983 Municipal Liability, Myriam E. Gilles
Articles
No abstract provided.
Sexual Misconduct And The Government: Time To Take A Stand , Andrea B. Daloia
Sexual Misconduct And The Government: Time To Take A Stand , Andrea B. Daloia
Cleveland State Law Review
This Note analyzes law enforcement's use of one particularly troublesome tactic-the use of sexual acts or romantic promises to encourage a defendant to participate in illegal activities or to obtain information that can be used against the defendant at trial. The first part of this Note gives a brief history of the outrageous government conduct defense, including its distinction from entrapment, its origin and its lack of success in the courts. Although the entrapment defense and the outrageous conduct defense have some similarities, they are in fact quite different. The second section of this Note discusses the perception of sex …
Double Jeopardy And Punishment: Why An As Applied Approach, As Applied To Separation Of Powers Doctrines, Is Unconstitutional, Todd W. Wyatt
Double Jeopardy And Punishment: Why An As Applied Approach, As Applied To Separation Of Powers Doctrines, Is Unconstitutional, Todd W. Wyatt
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment will argue that an as applied approach allows the executive branch, whether at the state or federal level, to encroach into the legislative realm by rendering a statute unconstitutional as a result of the way the statute is administered. Section II of this Comment will begin by examining the history of the as applied and on its face double jeopardy approaches during the last 20 years. After a close examination of the decisions in Halper and Hudson in sections II.B and II.C, this Comment will explain why the holding of Hudson, though correct in its result, was …
Science Fact Or Science Fiction? The Implications Of Court-Ordered Genetic Testing Under Rule 35, 34 U.S.F. L. Rev. 295 (2000), Anthony Niedwiecki
Science Fact Or Science Fiction? The Implications Of Court-Ordered Genetic Testing Under Rule 35, 34 U.S.F. L. Rev. 295 (2000), Anthony Niedwiecki
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Race, Class And Criminal Prosecutions: The Supreme Court’S Role In Targeting Minorities, David Cole
Race, Class And Criminal Prosecutions: The Supreme Court’S Role In Targeting Minorities, David Cole
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
In No Equal Justice, I examine the ways in which race and class disparities have an effect at each stage of the criminal justice system. Much of the disparity concerns discriminatory police practices. My argument is that the Supreme Court, and our society, have constructed a set of rules that virtually ensure there will be racially disparate prosecution of the criminal law by the police. The way the Court has done that, I suggest, is by creating pockets of discretion that police can use without having to identify any objective, individualized basis for suspicion. When the police are free to …
Prosecutorial Discretion And Prosecution Guidelines: A Case Study In Controlling Federalization, Michael A. Simons
Prosecutorial Discretion And Prosecution Guidelines: A Case Study In Controlling Federalization, Michael A. Simons
Faculty Publications
In this Article Michael Simons examines the ways in which the federalization of crime can be controlled. Simons argues that prosecutorial discretion is the most important variable in the federalization process and that controlling prosecutorial discretion is the key to controlling federalization. He presents the Child Support Recovery Act as a model for how prosecution guidelines for federal criminal statutes can provide such control Federalization of criminal child support enforcement has been successful because federal prosecutors have exercised discretion in a manner consistent with the concerns expressed by the bench and the academy about federalization. Simons concludes by exploring how …
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Capital Attrition: Error Rates In Capital Cases, 1973-1995, James S. Liebman, Jeffery Fagan, Valerie West, Jonathan Lloyd
Faculty Scholarship
Americans seem to be of two minds about the death penalty. In the last several years, the overall number of executions has risen steeply, reaching a fifty year high this year. Although two-thirds of the public support the penalty, this figure represents a sharp decline from the four-fifths of the population that endorsed the death penalty only six years ago, leaving support for capital punishment at a twenty year low. When life without parole is offered as an alternative, support for the penalty drops even more – often below a majority. Grants of executive clemency reached a twenty year high …
Patterns Of Injustice: Police Brutality In The Courts, Susan Bandes
Patterns Of Injustice: Police Brutality In The Courts, Susan Bandes
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Say It Loud: Indirect Speech And Racial Equality In The Interrogation Room, C. Antoinette Clarke
Say It Loud: Indirect Speech And Racial Equality In The Interrogation Room, C. Antoinette Clarke
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Is Capital Punishment A Deterrent To Crime?, Greg Warren Colyer
Is Capital Punishment A Deterrent To Crime?, Greg Warren Colyer
Theses Digitization Project
No abstract provided.
Be Careful What You Wish For: An Examination Of Arrest And Prosecution Patterns Of Domestic Violence Cases In Two Cities In Michigan, Andrea D. Lyon
Be Careful What You Wish For: An Examination Of Arrest And Prosecution Patterns Of Domestic Violence Cases In Two Cities In Michigan, Andrea D. Lyon
Michigan Journal of Gender & Law
This Article will examine six months of data on arrests for domestic violence in the cities of Ypsilanti and Ann Arbor. In order to be able to interpret what the data means Lyon did some other research. The results were surprising- for example, although women tend to be injured most severely by domestic violence, they use violence in intimate relationships a little more often than men. Part I of this Article traces a brief history of domestic violence and discusses the issue of who commits domestic violence, Part II discusses the "must arrest" and "should arrest" policies and their history, …
Character Evidence And Sex Crimes In The Federal Courts: Recent Developments, Robert F. Thompson Iii
Character Evidence And Sex Crimes In The Federal Courts: Recent Developments, Robert F. Thompson Iii
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Regulating The Market For Snitches, Ian Weinstein
Regulating The Market For Snitches, Ian Weinstein
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
California's Sexually Violent Predator Act: The Role Of Psychiatrists, Courts, And Medical Determinations In Confining Sex Offenders, Carolyn B. Ramsey
California's Sexually Violent Predator Act: The Role Of Psychiatrists, Courts, And Medical Determinations In Confining Sex Offenders, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
No abstract provided.
The Sheinbein Case And The Israeli-American Extradition Experience: A Need For Compromise, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
The Sheinbein Case And The Israeli-American Extradition Experience: A Need For Compromise, Abraham Abramovsky, Jonathan I. Edelstein
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article will examine the political ramifications of the extradition process and the need for compromise to prevent domestic politics from undermining the ends of law enforcement. This Article will also suggest possible measures to ease the complications that extradition poses to international law enforcement cooperation. Part II of this Article will examine the facts of the most recent and dramatic example of the politics of extradition as played out in the Sheinbein case. Part III will analyze other issues which have placed obstacles in the path of practical law enforcement and international relations, and the way that the United …
Restorative Justice: A Conceptual Framework, Jennifer Llewellyn, Robert L. Howse
Restorative Justice: A Conceptual Framework, Jennifer Llewellyn, Robert L. Howse
Reports & Public Policy Documents
Restorative justice has become a fashionable term both in Canadian and foreign legal and social policy discourse. Restorative justice is certainly not a new idea. In fact, it is foundational to our very ideas about law and conflict resolution. There is, nevertheless, a lack of clarity about the meaning of this term. Often it is used as a catchall phrase to refer to any practice which does not look like the mainstream practice of the administration of justice, particularly in the area of criminal justice. Little attention has been spent attempting to articulate what distinguishes a practice as restorative. Rather, …