Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- St. Mary's University (851)
- Seattle University School of Law (240)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (131)
- BLR (66)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (57)
-
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (54)
- Barry University School of Law (46)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (41)
- Pepperdine University (37)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (37)
- UIC School of Law (34)
- Brooklyn Law School (32)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (29)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (26)
- Georgetown University Law Center (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (23)
- Fordham Law School (20)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (18)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (18)
- New York Law School (17)
- University of Colorado Law School (17)
- University of Miami Law School (14)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (11)
- University of Maine School of Law (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Cornell University Law School (8)
- Georgia State University College of Law (8)
- American University Washington College of Law (7)
- Association of American Law Schools (7)
- Keyword
-
- St. Mary’s Law Journal (395)
- St. Mary’s University School of Law (385)
- Jurisprudence (170)
- Law and Society (112)
- Inc. (74)
-
- Law (53)
- Constitutional Law (51)
- Student comment (46)
- Constitution (43)
- Texas (43)
- First Amendment (39)
- Constitutional law (37)
- Legal History (36)
- Legislation (36)
- Supreme Court (36)
- Fourteenth Amendment (35)
- Judges (35)
- Texas Supreme Court (34)
- Criminal law (33)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (30)
- Courts (29)
- Due process (26)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (25)
- General Law (25)
- Litigation (25)
- Politics (24)
- Discrimination (23)
- Equal Protection Clause (23)
- Regulation (23)
- Religion (23)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- St. Mary's Law Journal (846)
- Seattle University Law Review (235)
- Cardozo Law Review (80)
- ExpressO (65)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (57)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (46)
- Northwestern University Law Review (43)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (41)
- Articles (36)
- UIC Law Review (32)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (31)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (25)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Scholarly Works (23)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (18)
- NYLS Law Review (16)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (14)
- Brooklyn Law Review (13)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (13)
- Indiana Law Journal (13)
- Publications (13)
- Fordham Law Review (12)
- Michigan Law Review (11)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (11)
- Arkansas Law Review (10)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (10)
- Journal of Law and Policy (10)
- Maine Law Review (10)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (9)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1591 - 1620 of 2100
Full-Text Articles in Law and Society
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality Recent Development., Robert A. Lauer
Hopwood V. Texas: A Victory For Equality That Denies Reality Recent Development., Robert A. Lauer
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Constitutional Fictions And Meritocratic Success Stories, Robin West
Constitutional Fictions And Meritocratic Success Stories, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
L.H. LaRue demonstrates in his book, Constitutional Law as Fiction, that, at least in the realm of constitutional law, there is no simple correspondence between fiction and falsehood, or fact and truth. Partial or fictive accounts of our constitutional history, even when they are riddled with inaccuracies, may state deep truths about our world, and accurate recitations of historical events may be either intentionally or unintentionally misleading in the extreme. According to LaRue, the Supreme Court engages in a form of storytelling or myth-making that goes beyond the inevitably partial narratives of fact and precedent. The Supreme Court also tells …
The Presumption Of Innocence: Patching The Tattered Cloak After Maryland V. Craig., Ralph H. Kohlmann
The Presumption Of Innocence: Patching The Tattered Cloak After Maryland V. Craig., Ralph H. Kohlmann
St. Mary's Law Journal
Over one hundred years ago, the United States Supreme Court recognized the importance of the presumption of innocence in a criminal justice system which is based on due process. The Court declared the presumption of innocence is “the undoubted law, axiomatic, and elementary, and its enforcements lies at the foundation … of our criminal law.” The Court’s changing view of the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause is the most recent contribution to the reduction in the practical value of the presumption of innocence. In Maryland v. Craig, the Court decided that while face-to-face confrontation forms the core of values furthered in …
This Could Be Your Culture--Junk Speech In A Time Of Decadence, Pierre Schlag
This Could Be Your Culture--Junk Speech In A Time Of Decadence, Pierre Schlag
Publications
No abstract provided.
Texas Private Real Property Rights Preservation Act: A Political Solution To The Regulatory Takings Problem Comment., George E. Grimes Jr.
Texas Private Real Property Rights Preservation Act: A Political Solution To The Regulatory Takings Problem Comment., George E. Grimes Jr.
St. Mary's Law Journal
Increasing environmental regulation has resulted in an antiregulation backlash and the growth of a property rights movement. Unable to successfully use the courts to protect private property from diminution in value due to government regulations, property rights advocates have looked to the federal and state legislatures for assistance. This has led to some states and the United States Congress to introduce private property rights protection. This protection generally takes one of two forms. The first requires the government to assess the possible effect on property rights before enacting regulations. The second requires the government to compensate property owners for the …
The Habeas Corpus Revolution: A New Role For State Courts., Charles F. Baird
The Habeas Corpus Revolution: A New Role For State Courts., Charles F. Baird
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article’s purpose is to portray recent changes in the United States Supreme Court’s habeas corpus jurisprudence—limiting the scope of the federal writ while reducing the federal judiciary’s role overseeing the criminal justice systems. Seemingly, the Court gave little thought to whether this reduction in federal oversight should be accompanied by a greater measure of review on the part of state courts. The writ of habeas corpus, often referred to as the Great Writ, is the primary means of enforcing rights guaranteed under the United States Constitution and federal courts are the principal guardians of these rights. While commitment to …
Law As Discourse: Bridging The Gap Between Democracy And Rights, Michel Rosenfeld
Law As Discourse: Bridging The Gap Between Democracy And Rights, Michel Rosenfeld
Articles
No abstract provided.
Taking It To The Streets: Putting Discourse Analysis To The Service Of A Public Defender's Office, Clark D. Cunningham, Bonnie S. Mcelhinny
Taking It To The Streets: Putting Discourse Analysis To The Service Of A Public Defender's Office, Clark D. Cunningham, Bonnie S. Mcelhinny
Faculty Publications By Year
No abstract provided.
Grant Gilmore, Holmes, And The Anxiety Of Influence, Charles M. Yablon
Grant Gilmore, Holmes, And The Anxiety Of Influence, Charles M. Yablon
Articles
The article explores Grant Gilmore's ambivalent relationship with Oliver Wendell Holmes, particularly in The Death of Contract. Gilmore both praises Holmes's intellectual brilliance and critiques his formalistic approach to contract law. Drawing on Harold Bloom's The Anxiety of Influence, the analysis suggests that Gilmore engages in a struggle with Holmes's legacy, reflecting a mix of admiration and opposition, akin to how strong poets handle influential predecessors.
J.E.B. V. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B.: Excellent Ideology, Ineffective Implementation., Nancy J. Cutler
J.E.B. V. Alabama Ex Rel. T.B.: Excellent Ideology, Ineffective Implementation., Nancy J. Cutler
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Did We Treaty Away Ker-Frisbie Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Timothy D. Rudy
Did We Treaty Away Ker-Frisbie Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Timothy D. Rudy
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article explores whether U.S. ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Civil and Political Covenant) provides the American judiciary with reason to jettison the Ker-Frisbie doctrine. If the United States does not forego use of the Ker-Frisbie doctrine the country will violate its international obligations arising from a major human rights treaty. Part II discusses the customary norm of international law which forbids—and the American rule which permits—forcible abductions overseas. It also reviews whether extraterritorial abductions violate customary international law. Part III discusses applicability of the Civil and Political Covenant to the Ker-Frisbie doctrine and details …
The Natural Law Tradition On The Modern Supreme Court: Not Burke, But The Enlightenment Tradition Represented By Locke, Madison, And Marshall., R. Randall Kelso
The Natural Law Tradition On The Modern Supreme Court: Not Burke, But The Enlightenment Tradition Represented By Locke, Madison, And Marshall., R. Randall Kelso
St. Mary's Law Journal
A traditional common-law style of judicial decisionmaking exists which was present at this nation’s founding. This common law style is derived from natural law tradition. And this tradition stands as an alternative to the formalism of Justice Scalia or the Holmesian style of Chief Justice Rehnquist. This natural law style, with its focus on the religious and communitarian ethical tradition, was the dominant view of judicial interpretation for the framing and ratifying generation of the original Constitution and the Civil War Amendments. The decisionmaking style of Justices O’Connor, Kennedy, and Souter appears to have great affinity with this traditional common-law …
The Texas Home Equity Controversy In Context Forum - Introduction., James W. Paulsen
The Texas Home Equity Controversy In Context Forum - Introduction., James W. Paulsen
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Essay provides some historical and legal context for the Texas home equity debate during the 1990s. It begins with an examination of early Texas homestead law, which did not clearly prohibit home equity lending. Part II describes the genesis of the homestead exemption in Texas. Public policy surrounding the homestead law had at least three components: protection of debtors, protection of women, and the fostering of an independent spirit in Texas settlers. Part III evaluates the Texas Constitution’s 1876 ban on home equity loans and the subsequent public debate up until the 1970s. Although criticism of the prohibition on …
Home Equity Reform In Texas Forum., Jerry Patterson
Home Equity Reform In Texas Forum., Jerry Patterson
St. Mary's Law Journal
Texas citizens should vote on home equity reform to be able to decide for themselves whether they desire the benefits of home equity borrowing. Texas is the only state in the nation that prohibits homeowners from using their home equity as they see fit such as to educate their children, to start or expand small businesses, or to enjoy their retirement years. Critics to home equity reform in Texas do not fully understand the scope of the amendments or the benefits that come with reform. The myth that equity loans would trigger an increase in foreclosure rates cannot be documented …
The Spoliation Tort: An Approach To Underlying Principles., Steffen Nolte
The Spoliation Tort: An Approach To Underlying Principles., Steffen Nolte
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Private Plaintiffs May Not Maintain Aiding And Abetting Suits Under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(B) And Securities And Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5., Ginger E. Margolin
Private Plaintiffs May Not Maintain Aiding And Abetting Suits Under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(B) And Securities And Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5., Ginger E. Margolin
St. Mary's Law Journal
In Central Bank v. First Interstate Bank, the United States Supreme Court held that private plaintiffs may not maintain aiding and abetting suits under Securities Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Security and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5. The Court views Section 10(b) of the 1934 Act as a “catchall antifraud provision” that makes the use of “any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance” in contravention of the provision a violation of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules if such acts occur during the purchase or sale of securities. Rule 10b-5 is substantially the same as Section 10(b). However, neither Section 10(b) …
The Women's Convention And The Equal Protection Clause Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Michael J. Corbera
The Women's Convention And The Equal Protection Clause Symposium - Human Rights In The Americas., Michael J. Corbera
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article addresses whether the United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (Women’s Convention) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because international treaties such as the Women’s Convention carry the same weight and are subject to the same treatment as U.S. federal law, the constitutionality of the Convention is dictated by U.S. jurisprudence. Part II of this Article outlines and discusses the origin and content of the Women’s Convention. Part III contains a historical review of gender jurisprudence in the United States, with particular emphasis on …
Chief Justice Calvert: Man Of Imperturable Integrity In Memoriam., Thomas M. Reavley
Chief Justice Calvert: Man Of Imperturable Integrity In Memoriam., Thomas M. Reavley
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Chief Justice Calvert: Simple Rules Made Him Great In Memoriam., Jack Pope
Chief Justice Calvert: Simple Rules Made Him Great In Memoriam., Jack Pope
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Chief Justice Calvert, Our Highly Regarded Of Counsel In Memoriam., Lloyd Lochridge
Chief Justice Calvert, Our Highly Regarded Of Counsel In Memoriam., Lloyd Lochridge
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Shading Of America: Keynote Address Before The 1995 National Conference Of Law Reviews Address., Antonia Hernandez
Shading Of America: Keynote Address Before The 1995 National Conference Of Law Reviews Address., Antonia Hernandez
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Appellate Review Of Criminal Cases In Texas - Foreword Foreword., Charles F. Baird
Appellate Review Of Criminal Cases In Texas - Foreword Foreword., Charles F. Baird
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Appellate Review Of Criminal Cases In Texas., Ellen Bloomer Mitchell
Appellate Review Of Criminal Cases In Texas., Ellen Bloomer Mitchell
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Article guides Texas practitioners in effectively preparing and presenting criminal cases on appeal. Its primary focus concerns the standards of review appellate courts use in determining the merits of the issues raised before them and, equally important, proper preservation and presentation of those issues. This Article does not exhaust the matters which may be raised on appeal in a criminal case. Rather, it covers a variety of issues and errors commonly raised in the “ordinary” criminal appeal. Understanding and utilizing this information in the presentation of issues on appeal will help the practitioner direct the appellate court to find …
Cutting Costs - Cutting Care: Can Texas Managed Health Care Systems And Hmos Be Liable For The Medical Malpractice Of Physicians., Jim M. Perdue, Stephen R. Baxley
Cutting Costs - Cutting Care: Can Texas Managed Health Care Systems And Hmos Be Liable For The Medical Malpractice Of Physicians., Jim M. Perdue, Stephen R. Baxley
St. Mary's Law Journal
One of the most common forms of managed health care is the health maintenance organization (HMO). An HMO is a quasi-insurance arrangement which provides health care to subscribers for a prepaid monthly fee. These have been attractive as they offer health care at lower cost to consumers. Health care brokers have developed four standard models of HMOs— “staff model,” “group model,” “network model,” and “independent practice association” (IPA) model. Given the degree of control HMOs exercise over member-physicians under any of the above models, Texas courts should hold HMOs liable for their member-physicians’ malpractice under the doctrine of vicarious liability, …
Texas's New Habeas Corpus Procedure For Death-Row Inmates: Kafkaesque - And Probably Unconstitutional., James C. Harrington, Anne More Burnham
Texas's New Habeas Corpus Procedure For Death-Row Inmates: Kafkaesque - And Probably Unconstitutional., James C. Harrington, Anne More Burnham
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Beauty And The Beast: Physical Appearance Discrimination In American Criminal Trials Comment., David L. Wiley
Beauty And The Beast: Physical Appearance Discrimination In American Criminal Trials Comment., David L. Wiley
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Comment considers physical appearance discrimination by jurors in criminal trials. It proposes remedial measures to eliminate discrimination and effectuate the underlying purposes of jury trials. Part II of this Comment examines the psychological process of corporeal attribution and discusses the underlying philosophic dichotomy of image and substance. It surveys the role modern American culture plays in discrimination in the American criminal law system and discusses parallel relationships between race, sex, and physical appearance discrimination. Part IV explores constitutional ramifications of fostering and promoting physical appearance discrimination in criminal trials. Finally, Part V presents remedies designed to ensure criminal defendants …
Can A Twenty-First Century Texas Tolerate Its Nineteenth Century Judicial Selection Process Commentary., Charles Bleil
Can A Twenty-First Century Texas Tolerate Its Nineteenth Century Judicial Selection Process Commentary., Charles Bleil
St. Mary's Law Journal
Judicial selection by popular election is no longer practical in Texas. Texans must question the adequacy of the Texas judicial selection process for the next century. The history of Texas has seen the implementation of various methods for selecting the judiciary. Initially, the creation of courts by the Republic of Texas’s Constitution required joint ballot of both houses of the Texas Congress to select judges. However, in 1876, Texas began holding elections for jurists by popular vote. This enactment was in response to the drafters’ desire to limit government intervention during the Reconstruction era. Although the suitability of popular election …
Would You Like More Salt With That Wound - Post-Sentence Victim Allocution In Texas Comment., Keith D. Nicholson
Would You Like More Salt With That Wound - Post-Sentence Victim Allocution In Texas Comment., Keith D. Nicholson
St. Mary's Law Journal
A majority of states permit victim allocution of some sort, with victim impact statements made during the pre-sentencing stage, but Texas is currently the only state which permits victim allocution after sentencing. Since 1991, no one has seriously challenged the Texas practice of allowing such victim statements. Yet, scenes of violence between families of the defendants and the victims following such statements has ignited a movement to reassess the utility of allowing victims to address defendants who have already received their sentences. Originally, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 42.03 provided victims the chance to present a statement after the …
Federalism Revisited: The Supreme Court Resurrects The Notion Of Enumerated Powers By Limiting Congress's Attempt To Federalize Crime Comment., Larry E. Gee
St. Mary's Law Journal
This Comment argues the federal system must be preserved and the Supreme Court should build upon the interpretation of the Commerce Clause in United States v. Lopez to reinstate the Framers’ vision of federalism. The social justifications for the Court’s expansive construction of the Commerce Clause during the past sixty years no longer existed to justify the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. Part II of this Comment traces the background of Commerce Clause jurisprudence, focusing on social justifications for traditional rubber stamping of Congress’s broad exercises of power. Part III reviews the Fifth Circuit’s reasoning in deeming the Gun-Free …
The Texas Homestead: The Last Bulwark Of Liberty Forum., Henry B. Gonzalez
The Texas Homestead: The Last Bulwark Of Liberty Forum., Henry B. Gonzalez
St. Mary's Law Journal
For more than 155 years Texans have adamantly supported the principle that the fundamental need for shelter justifies strict constitutional protection of homes from creditors in all but a few situations. This Article discusses where homestead protection came from and why it should not be lightly discarded. The Texas Constitution contains many rights and liberties for the protection and benefit of the state’s citizens. Unique among these treasured liberties is the protection of a person’s homestead from forced sale or foreclosure by creditors. A group of bankers and other financiers—for whom a homestead is nothing more than collateral and a …