Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (31)
- Law and Society (29)
- Criminal Law (15)
- Law and Gender (13)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
-
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Education Law (7)
- Legal History (7)
- International Law (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Legal Education (6)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Immigration Law (4)
- Labor and Employment Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Courts (3)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (3)
- Family Law (3)
- Litigation (3)
- President/Executive Department (3)
- Social Welfare Law (3)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Food and Drug Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Race (23)
- Law and race (13)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Criminal justice (8)
- Criminal law (7)
-
- Criminal procedure (6)
- Discrimination (5)
- Education Law (5)
- Law and Society (5)
- States (5)
- Gender (4)
- Legal Profession (4)
- Politics (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Criminal defense (3)
- Diversity (3)
- Equity (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Parents and Children (3)
- Police (3)
- Poverty law (3)
- Schools (3)
- Sex (3)
- Age (2)
- Athletics (2)
- Comparative Law (2)
- Courts (2)
- Employment Practice (2)
Articles 61 - 71 of 71
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Gender Hate Propaganda And Sexual Violence In The Rwandan Genocide: An Argument For Intersectionality In International Law, Llezlie Green
Gender Hate Propaganda And Sexual Violence In The Rwandan Genocide: An Argument For Intersectionality In International Law, Llezlie Green
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article explores the gendered dimensions of genocidal hate propaganda before and during the Rwandan genocide and proposes that the international tribunal consider these cases with an intersectional approach that attempts to fully appreciate the harm inflicted upon Tutsi women.
I Want A Black Lawyer To Represent Me: Addressing A Black Defendant's Concerns With Being Assigned A White Court-Appointed Lawyer, Kenneth P. Troccoli
I Want A Black Lawyer To Represent Me: Addressing A Black Defendant's Concerns With Being Assigned A White Court-Appointed Lawyer, Kenneth P. Troccoli
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
"I want a Black lawyer to represent me." These are the first words you hear after you introduce yourself to your new client. You have been appointed to represent this man on a criminal charge. You are white. He is Black. You answer that you are an experienced criminal lawyer and will represent him to the best of your ability, regardless of his or your race. He responds that he too is experienced with the criminal justice system-a system that targets Black men, like himself, for prosecution far more than whites, that sentences Black men to prison more frequently and …
From Buchanan To Button: Legal Ethics And The Naacp (Part Ii), Susan Carle
From Buchanan To Button: Legal Ethics And The Naacp (Part Ii), Susan Carle
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
The Bill Of Rights And The Constitution: Facing The Challenge Of The Future, Stephen Wermiel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Prosecution And Race: The Power And Privilege Of Discretion, Angela J. Davis
Prosecution And Race: The Power And Privilege Of Discretion, Angela J. Davis
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article examines prosecutorial discretion and argues it is a major cause of racial inequality in the criminal justice system. It asserts that prosecutorial discretion may instead be used to construct effective solutions to racial injustice. The article maintains that since prosecutors have more power than any other criminal justice officials, with practically no corresponding accountability to the public they serve, they have the responsibility to use their discretion to help eradicate the discriminatory treatment of African Americans in the criminal justice system.
Part I of the Article explains the importance and impact of the prosecution function. Part II discusses …
Wielding The Double-Edge Sword: Charles Hamilton Houston And Judicial Activism In The Age Of Legal Realism, Roger Fairfax
Wielding The Double-Edge Sword: Charles Hamilton Houston And Judicial Activism In The Age Of Legal Realism, Roger Fairfax
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
A new progressive movement in the law profoundly affected the American judicial climate of the 1930s and 1940s. The jurisprudence of American Legal Realism, which sprang from the progressive American sociological jurisprudence, boasted the adherence of some of America's most influential legal minds. Legal Realism, which complemented the New Deal reform legislation emerging in the 1930s, advocated judicial deference to legislative and administrative channels on matters of social and economic policy. Judicial activism, which had been used as a tool for the protection of economic rights since the late nineteenth century, was seen as inimical to progressive social reform and, …
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Race, Cops, And Traffic Stops, Angela J. Davis
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article discusses the Supreme Court's failure to provide a clear and effective remedy for discriminatory pretextual traffic stops. The first part explores the discretionary nature of pretextual stops and their discriminatory effect on African-Americans and Latinos. Then, the article examines Whren v. United States, a Supreme Court case in which the petitioners claimed that these “pretextual stops” violate the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution and are racially discriminatory. The Supreme Court rejected the claim, upholding the constitutionality of pretextual stops based on probable cause and noting that claims of racial discrimination must be challenged under the Equal Protection Clause. …
Crime And Punishment: Benign Neglect Of Racism In The Criminal Justice System, Angela J. Davis
Crime And Punishment: Benign Neglect Of Racism In The Criminal Justice System, Angela J. Davis
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
This article is a literary review and analysis of Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America by Michael Tonry (1995). Part I of this review describes Tonry's analysis of the crime policies of the Reagan and Bush administrations. Part II discusses Tonry's indictment of the War on Drugs and criticizes his failure to acknowledge the effects of discriminatory prosecutorial practices and sentencing laws. Part III critiques Tonry's trivialization of the significance of race discrimination in the criminal justice system more generally. Part IV summarizes Tonry's proposals for change and stresses the importance of documenting, examining, and eliminating racial bias …
Who Shall Rule And Govern? Local Legislative Delegations, Racial Politics, And The Voting Rights Act, Binny Miller
Who Shall Rule And Govern? Local Legislative Delegations, Racial Politics, And The Voting Rights Act, Binny Miller
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
O'Connor: A Dual Role - An Introduction, Stephen Wermiel
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Proving Discrimination After Price Waterhouse And Wards Cove, Candace Kovacic-Fleischer
Proving Discrimination After Price Waterhouse And Wards Cove, Candace Kovacic-Fleischer
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
INTRODUCTION Anyone involved in litigation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 19641 or similar state statutes may wonder what is entailed in proving or disproving discrimination after the United States Supreme Court's October 1988 Term. In fact, in the pending Civil Rights Act of 1990, Congress is considering reversing some of what the Supreme Court did during that Term. One of the issues that the Supreme Court addressed during the 1988 Term involved allocating burdens of proof in two major types of Title VII claims, dis- parate-treatment and disparate-impact. Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, dealt with a disparate-treatment …