Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Criminal Law (10)
- Law and Society (9)
- Constitutional Law (5)
- Criminal Procedure (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (4)
- Family Law (4)
- Juvenile Law (4)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Law and Race (4)
- Psychology (4)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- Legal Education (3)
- Property Law and Real Estate (3)
- Social Welfare Law (3)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Courts (2)
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Judges (2)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Legal Profession (2)
- Legal Studies (2)
- Litigation (2)
- Religion Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- New York Law School (4)
- UIC School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (3)
-
- Cleveland State University (2)
- Georgetown University Law Center (2)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (2)
- University of Connecticut (2)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (2)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of San Diego (1)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (1)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Death penalty (3)
- Decision making (3)
- Bias (2)
- Confession (2)
- Criminal law (2)
-
- Empirical (2)
- Empirical studies (2)
- International human rights law (2)
- Interrogation (2)
- Law and psychology (2)
- Mental disability law (2)
- Mental states (2)
- Model Penal Code (2)
- Probability (2)
- Race (2)
- Race and law (2)
- Sentencing (2)
- Therapeutic jurisprudence (2)
- Abuse (1)
- Actuarial risk assessment (1)
- Adolescence (1)
- Anger (1)
- Antitrust (1)
- Applicant-flow analysis (1)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal (1)
- Assessment (1)
- Atkins (1)
- Attribution (1)
- Behavioral law and economics (1)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (1)
- Publication
-
- Articles (4)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Publications (3)
- Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal (2)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (2)
-
- Psychology Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (2)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Cleveland State Law Review (1)
- College of Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Department of Psychology: Faculty Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Lectures and Presentations (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Graduate Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Journal of Law and Health (1)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (1)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (1)
- Michigan Law Review (1)
- Nebraska College of Law: Faculty Publications (1)
- Other Publications (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 48 of 48
Full-Text Articles in Law and Psychology
Parenting By The Clock: The Best-Interest-Of-The-Child Standard, Judicial Discretion, And The American Law Institute's "Approximation Rule", Richard A. Warshak
Parenting By The Clock: The Best-Interest-Of-The-Child Standard, Judicial Discretion, And The American Law Institute's "Approximation Rule", Richard A. Warshak
University of Baltimore Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Need To Overrule Mapp V. Ohio, William T. Pizzi
The Need To Overrule Mapp V. Ohio, William T. Pizzi
Publications
This Article argues that it is time to overrule Mapp v. Ohio. It contends that the exclusionary rule is outdated because a tough deterrent sanction is difficult to reconcile with a criminal justice system where victims are increasingly seen to have a stake in criminal cases. The rule is also increasingly outdated in its epistemological assumption which insists officers act on "reasons" that they can articulate and which disparages actions based on "hunches" or "feelings." This assumption runs counter to a large body of neuroscience research suggesting that humans often "feel" or "sense" danger, sometimes even at a subconscious …
Lying In The Scanner: Covert Countermeasures Disrupt Deception Detection By Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Giorgio Ganis, J. Peter Rosenfeld, John B. Meixner Jr., Rogier Kievit, Haline Schendan
Lying In The Scanner: Covert Countermeasures Disrupt Deception Detection By Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Giorgio Ganis, J. Peter Rosenfeld, John B. Meixner Jr., Rogier Kievit, Haline Schendan
Scholarly Works
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have documented differences between deceptive and honest responses. Capitalizing on this research, companies marketing fMRI-based lie detection services have been founded, generating methodological and ethical concerns in scientific and legal communities. Critically, no fMRI study has examined directly the effect of countermeasures, methods used by prevaricators to defeat deception detection procedures. An fMRI study was conducted to fill this research gap using a concealed information paradigm in which participants were trained to use countermeasures. Robust group fMRI differences between deceptive and honest responses were found without, but not with countermeasures. Furthermore, in single participants, …
Guardianship For Persons With Mental Illness - A Legal And Appropriate Alternative?, Leslie Salzman
Guardianship For Persons With Mental Illness - A Legal And Appropriate Alternative?, Leslie Salzman
Articles
The article critiques the U.S. guardianship system for individuals with psychosocial disabilities, arguing that it often unnecessarily restricts their autonomy by removing their legal right to make decisions. It advocates for supported decision-making models as a less restrictive alternative, aligning with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). The analysis emphasizes the importance of maximizing integration and participation in social, economic, and civic life, while highlighting the need for safeguards to ensure effective support without undue bureaucratic complexity.
Capital Punishment, Psychiatrists And The Potential Bottleneck Of Competence , Jacob M. Appel
Capital Punishment, Psychiatrists And The Potential Bottleneck Of Competence , Jacob M. Appel
Journal of Law and Health
The purpose of this paper is to merge two largely separate bodies of writing on the subject of psychiatric participation in capital punishment. Much has already been written from the perspective of legal academics regarding the rights of prisoners to be free from unwanted medical care if the purpose of providing such care is to render them fit for execution. Medical ethicists have also written much on the degree to which physicians, and specifically psychiatrists, may participate in facilitating the death penalty before they become so complicit as to violate accepted standards of professional ethics. Surprisingly, these two fields of …
Economics, Behavioral Biology, And Law, Owen D. Jones, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Jeffrey Evans Stake
Economics, Behavioral Biology, And Law, Owen D. Jones, Erin O'Hara O'Connor, Jeffrey Evans Stake
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
The article first compares economics and behavioral biology, examining the assumptions, core concepts, methodological tenets, and emphases of the two fields. Building on this, the article then compares the applied interdisciplinary fields of law and economics, on one hand, with law and behavioral biology, on the other - highlighting not only the most important similarities, but also the most important differences.
The article subsequently explores ways that biological perspectives on human behavior may prove useful, by improving economic models and the behavioral insights they generate. The article concludes that although there are important differences between the two fields, the overlaps …
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Excluding Unemployed Workers From Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Michelle Oberman’S And Cheryl L. Meyer’S “When Mothers Kill: Interviews From Prison”, Michael L. Perlin
Book Review Of Michelle Oberman’S And Cheryl L. Meyer’S “When Mothers Kill: Interviews From Prison”, Michael L. Perlin
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Torture In The Eyes Of The Beholder, Mary-Hunter M. Mcdonnell, Loran F. Nordgren, George Loewenstein
Torture In The Eyes Of The Beholder, Mary-Hunter M. Mcdonnell, Loran F. Nordgren, George Loewenstein
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
This Article draws upon recent social psychological research to demonstrate the psychological difficulty of distinguishing between torture and enhanced interrogation. We critique the accuracy of evaluations made under the current torture standard using two constructs--reliability and validity--that are employed in the social sciences to assess the quality of a construct or metric. We argue that evaluations of interrogation tactics using the current standard are both unreliable and invalid. We first argue that the torture standard is unreliable because of the marked variation in the manner in which different jurisdictions interpret and employ it. Next, we draw on recent social psychological …
Abandoned Love: The Impact Of Wyatt V. Stickney On The Intersection Between International Human Rights And Domestic Mental Disability Law, Michael L. Perlin
Abandoned Love: The Impact Of Wyatt V. Stickney On The Intersection Between International Human Rights And Domestic Mental Disability Law, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
Wyatt v. Stickney - the first case to find (40 years ago) a constitutional right to treatment for persons institutionalized because of mental disability - is the most important institutional rights case litigated in the history of domestic mental disability law. It spawned “copycat” litigation in multiple federal district courts and state superior courts, led directly to the creation of “Patients’ Bills of Rights” in most states, and inspired the creation of the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act, the Mental Health Systems Act Bill of Rights, and the federally-funded Protection and Advocacy System. Its direct influence on …
Online, Distance Legal Education As An Agent Of Social Change, Michael L. Perlin
Online, Distance Legal Education As An Agent Of Social Change, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
New York Law School (NYLS) created its online, distance learning mental disability law program in an effort to provide education in an area of the law that remains hidden in most law school curricula. Since 2000, it has offered its mental disability law courses in an online, distance learning format to its own students, to law students from other US-based law schools, to mental health professionals, to students in all the allied mental health professions and in the fields of criminology and criminal justice, and to activists and advocates (including members of the psychiatric survivor movement). It has offered the …
Considering Pathological Altruism In The Law From Therapeutic Jurisprudence And Neuroscience Perspectives, Michael L. Perlin
Considering Pathological Altruism In The Law From Therapeutic Jurisprudence And Neuroscience Perspectives, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Beyond Common Sense: A Social Psychological Study Of Iqbal's Effect On Claims Of Race Discrimination, Victor D. Quintanilla
Articles by Maurer Faculty
This article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937 (2009) from a social psychological perspective, and empirically studies Iqbal’s effect on claims of race discrimination.
In Twombly and then Iqbal, the Court recast Rule 8 from a notice-based rule into a plausibility standard. Under Iqbal, federal judges must evaluate whether each complaint contains sufficient factual matter “to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” When doing so, Iqbal requires judges to draw on their “judicial experience and common sense.” Courts apply Iqbal at the pleading stage, before evidence has been …
The Principle Of Subsidiarity Applied: Reforming The Legal Framework To Capture The Psychological Abuse Of Children, Jessica Dixon Weaver
The Principle Of Subsidiarity Applied: Reforming The Legal Framework To Capture The Psychological Abuse Of Children, Jessica Dixon Weaver
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
Psychological abuse is the most prevalent type of child abuse. It lies at the core of child maltreatment because it is embedded in and interacts with physical and sexual abuse, as well as physical neglect. It also has a more extensive and destructive impact on the development of children than any other type of abuse. Yet, the current child protection system fails to adequately address the problem because the normative framework of the child protection system does not always include the psychological abuse of children. For the majority of states, the physical health, safety, and well-being of children are focal …
The Behavioral Economics Of Mergers And Acquisitions, Donald C. Langevoort
The Behavioral Economics Of Mergers And Acquisitions, Donald C. Langevoort
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
The world of mergers and acquisitions seems like a setting in which rationality necessarily dominates. There are high stakes, focused and sustained attention, and expert advisers who are repeat players. In the economics and management literature, however, there has been a great deal of research on what might be called “behavioral M&A”—using insights from psychology to explain observed patterns of behavior in the acquisitions marketplace. To date, the law has largely been uninterested in the psychological dynamics of corporate acquisitions. This essay looks at recent research on such issues as the role of overconfidence, hubris, anchoring, etc. in explaining buy-side …
Moral Disengagement Among Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Longitudinal Study Of The Relations Between Morally Disengaged Attitudes And Offending, Jeffrey Fagan, Elizabeth P. Shulman, Elizabeth Cauffman, Alex R. Piquero
Moral Disengagement Among Serious Juvenile Offenders: A Longitudinal Study Of The Relations Between Morally Disengaged Attitudes And Offending, Jeffrey Fagan, Elizabeth P. Shulman, Elizabeth Cauffman, Alex R. Piquero
Faculty Scholarship
The present study investigates the relation between moral disengagement – one’s willingness to conditionally endorse transgressive behavior – and ongoing offending in a sample of adolescent male felony offenders (N=1,169). In addition, the study attempts to rule out callous-unemotional traits as a third variable responsible for observed associations between moral disengagement and offending. A bivariate latent change score analysis suggests that reduction in moral disengagement helps to speed decline in self-reported antisocial behavior, even after adjusting for the potential confound of callous-unemotional traits. Declines in moral disengagement are also associated with declining likelihood of offending, based on official records. Given …
Legal Reasoning And Scientific Reasoning, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Legal Reasoning And Scientific Reasoning, Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Articles
In my presentation for the 2010 Meador Lectures on Rationality, I chose to compare legal reasoning and scientific reasoning. Both law and science pride themselves on the rationality of their intellectual methods and believe that those methods are designed to analyze questions and reach the correct conclusions by means of reason, free from cognitive or emotional biases. Of course, both law and science often fall short of this ideal at all levels, from the decisions about individual legal cases or scientific studies to the acceptance of general theories. In many ways, the biases that mislead legal and scientific thinkers are …
Losing It, William I. Miller
Losing It, William I. Miller
Articles
You are in your sixties, even fifties, and you are walking by a shop window, or in some area in which a security monitor shows a scan of the line you are in. You sneak a look. You see someone in the space where you should be but you do not recognize the interloper. Then, after an unseemly lag of a second or two you are forced to remake your own acquaintance; it seems you no longer know yourself at first sight. The you behind your eyes believes you look like you did twenty years ago, and it assumes that …