Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law and Psychology Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Criminal Procedure

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 421 - 426 of 426

Full-Text Articles in Law and Psychology

Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi Jan 1977

Competency To Stand Trial In Federal Courts: Conceptual And Constitutional Problems, William T. Pizzi

Publications

No abstract provided.

Go to article

Constitutional Law—Due Process Requires That Limits Be Placed On Psychiatric Confinement Commensurate With The Procedural Safeguards Employed In Obtaining That Confinement., Christopher B. Ashton Jan 1973

Constitutional Law—Due Process Requires That Limits Be Placed On Psychiatric Confinement Commensurate With The Procedural Safeguards Employed In Obtaining That Confinement., Christopher B. Ashton

Buffalo Law Review

McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution, 407 U.S. 245 (1972).

Go to article

Personality Tests For Prospective Jurors, C. David Emerson Jan 1968

Personality Tests For Prospective Jurors, C. David Emerson

Kentucky Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Go to article

The Psychiatrist As An Expert Witness: Some Ruminations And Speculations, Bernard L. Diamond, David W. Louisell Jun 1965

The Psychiatrist As An Expert Witness: Some Ruminations And Speculations, Bernard L. Diamond, David W. Louisell

Michigan Law Review

Consider the difference between the expert testimony of an orthopedic surgeon in a personal injury suit and the testimony of a psychiatrist in a murder trial in which some elements of the mens rea are at issue. In both instances an expert opinion is received in evidence, providing the trier of fact with technical, specialized information which must, or should, be available in order to permit a rational decision-making process. Well-established rules govern the nature of expert evidence and its mode of presentation. In legal theory, the orthopedic surgeon and the psychiatrist are both experts-physicians-who perform comparable functions in the …

Go to article

Drug Induced Statements, Gilbert Geis, Ernest R. Kamm Jan 1961

Drug Induced Statements, Gilbert Geis, Ernest R. Kamm

Cleveland State Law Review

No serious attempt appears to have been made to check the opinions of scientific authorities in regard to drug-induced statements, beyond a cursory survey in 1941, and the courts have gone their way without much information, often, as has been charged in other areas involving forensic psychiatry, substituting the claims of the more articulate and aggressive members of the profession for the consensus of knowledgeable opinion within the entire group. This paper, therefore, is an attempt to learn from a sample of psychiatrists the present state of professional belief about the legal value and reliability of barbiturate drugs in forensic …

Go to article

Irresistible Impulse And Criminal Liability, John Barker Waite Mar 1925

Irresistible Impulse And Criminal Liability, John Barker Waite

Michigan Law Review

Do you believe in free-will, or mechanistic determinism, or fore-ordination, or fatalism? What do you mean by 'irresistible impulse'? What is the purpose of this prosecution against which you advocate, or deny, irresistible impulse as a defense; and just what do you mean by 'defense'? If, instead of one question, "is irresistible impulse a defense", we should ask these other questions of counsel, judge and medical expert, how often would their answers be in accord? Yet the one question can never be intelligently discussed in the absence of certainty and agreement as to the other premises. There are certain combinations …

Go to article

First Prev