Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law and Philosophy Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Supreme Court

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 121 - 135 of 135

Full-Text Articles in Law and Philosophy

January 9, 2009: So Help Me God?, Bruce Ledewitz Jan 2009

January 9, 2009: So Help Me God?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “So Help Me God?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


December 22, 2008: A New Kind Of Faith, Bruce Ledewitz Dec 2008

December 22, 2008: A New Kind Of Faith, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “A New Kind of Faith“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


December 7, 2008: The Conclusion Of For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz Dec 2008

December 7, 2008: The Conclusion Of For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Conclusion of For the Establishment of Religion “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


November 25, 2008: Pleasant Grove City V. Summum, Bruce Ledewitz Nov 2008

November 25, 2008: Pleasant Grove City V. Summum, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “ Pleasant Grove City v. Summum“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


September 23, 2008: Excerpt From For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz Sep 2008

September 23, 2008: Excerpt From For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Excerpt from For the Establishment of Religion“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


August 3, 2008: Is There A Common Core To Religion?, Bruce Ledewitz Aug 2008

August 3, 2008: Is There A Common Core To Religion?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “Is There a Common Core to Religion?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


July 6, 2008: For The Establishment Of Religion: Where Are We Now?, Bruce Ledewitz Jul 2008

July 6, 2008: For The Establishment Of Religion: Where Are We Now?, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “For the Establishment of Religion: Where Are We Now?“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


June 28, 2008: The Kennedy Court On Religion, Bruce Ledewitz Jun 2008

June 28, 2008: The Kennedy Court On Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “The Kennedy Court on Religion“ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


May 21, 2008: For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz May 2008

May 21, 2008: For The Establishment Of Religion, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

Blog post, “For the Establishment of Religion “ discusses politics, theology and the law in relation to religion and public life in the democratic United States of America.


October 19, 2007: World Magazine Interview With Bruce Ledewitz, Bruce Ledewitz Oct 2007

October 19, 2007: World Magazine Interview With Bruce Ledewitz, Bruce Ledewitz

Hallowed Secularism

World Magazine interview with Bruce Ledewitz


Umpires At Bat: On Integration And Legitimation, Neil S. Siegel Oct 2007

Umpires At Bat: On Integration And Legitimation, Neil S. Siegel

Faculty Scholarship

During his confirmation hearings. Chief Justice Roberts captured the public's imagination when he offered an interpretation of the role that judges play in our society when interpreting the Constitution. Judges and Justices are servants of the law, not the other way around, he said. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don't make the rules, they apply them. The role of an umpire and a judge is critical. They make sure everybody plays by the rules, but it is a limited role. Nobody ever went to a ball game to see an umpire.

In this inquiry, I identify some tensions between the …


A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel Aug 2005

A Theory In Search Of A Court, And Itself: Judicial Minimalism At The Supreme Court Bar, Neil S. Siegel

Faculty Scholarship

Cass Sunstein has prominently and provocatively advocated a theory of judicial minimalism. He has claimed that minimalism provides both an accurate descriptive account of how the Supreme Court decides constitutional cases and a persuasive normative theory of how the Justices should exercise their power of judicial review. In fact, he has written that the October 2003 Term demonstrates the Court's commitment to judicial minimalism.

In this Article, I demonstrate a deep tension between Professor Sunstein's aspiration that minimalism serve as an empirically testable (and thus descriptively accurate) account of the Supreme Court's work, and his ambition that minimalism provide a …


Torture, Marcy Strauss Jan 2004

Torture, Marcy Strauss

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.


Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes Jan 1990

Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes

Law Faculty Publications

This article considers the abortion controversy in the context of intellectual history and political theory. It does not analyze the Supreme Court's recent abortion cases, rely upon formal legal reasoning, or predict how the Court will decide any cases currently pending on its docket. Instead, it examines the Court's current options in light of the intersecting and pliable traditions of liberalism and republicanism. ...


Review Essay: Liberalism And The Supreme Court, Donald P. Kommers Jan 1987

Review Essay: Liberalism And The Supreme Court, Donald P. Kommers

Journal Articles

In Liberalism and American Constitutional Law, Rogers M. Smith of Yale University takes stock of the American liberal tradition and its impact on the Supreme Court's constitutional jurisprudence. It argues that the tradition's political vision lacks philosophical coherence and that our constitutional law, by reflecting this incoherence, has failed to provide the legal community with a public philosophy suited to the needs of American society in the late twentieth century.His goal is to demonstrate the superiority of "rational liberty," both as a philosophical theory and practical guide to constitutional policymaking, over three major competing versions of liberal constitutionalism. To wit: …