Law and Philosophy Commons^™

Law, Politics, And The Claims Of Community, Stephen A. Gardbaum

Michigan Law Review

This article aims to provide this needed analysis and then to show how it illuminates many of the exchanges taking place within the legal academy. It argues that the first step toward understanding "the claims of community" - whether in law or moral and political theory - is to recognize that, as the phrase itself suggests, more than one claim is involved. Merely to observe that the various proponents of community have as yet failed to establish a common and coherent communitarian position, though certainly true, is to miss the more critical insight: they are not engaged in such an …

"Liberalism's Dangerous Supplements": Medieval Ghosts Of International Law, Anthony Carty

Michigan Journal of International Law

A book review of From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument by Martti Koskenniemi

Moralistic Liberalism And Legal Moralism, Robert P. George

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Harmless Wrongdoing: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law by Joel Feinberg

Happy Slaves: A Critique Of Consent Theory, Adam C. Sloane

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Happy Slaves: A Critique of Consent Theory by Don Herzog

Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes

Law Faculty Publications

This article considers the abortion controversy in the context of intellectual history and political theory. It does not analyze the Supreme Court's recent abortion cases, rely upon formal legal reasoning, or predict how the Court will decide any cases currently pending on its docket. Instead, it examines the Court's current options in light of the intersecting and pliable traditions of liberalism and republicanism. ...

Review Essay: Liberalism And The Supreme Court, Donald P. Kommers

Journal Articles

In Liberalism and American Constitutional Law, Rogers M. Smith of Yale University takes stock of the American liberal tradition and its impact on the Supreme Court's constitutional jurisprudence. It argues that the tradition's political vision lacks philosophical coherence and that our constitutional law, by reflecting this incoherence, has failed to provide the legal community with a public philosophy suited to the needs of American society in the late twentieth century.His goal is to demonstrate the superiority of "rational liberty," both as a philosophical theory and practical guide to constitutional policymaking, over three major competing versions of liberal constitutionalism. To wit: …

Reconstructing Public Philosophy, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Reconstructing Public Philosophy by William M. Sullivan

Liberalism, Radicalism, And Legal Scholarship, Steven H. Shiffrin

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

Book Review Of Furious Fancies: American Political Thought In The Post-Liberal Era, By Philip Abbott, Edward A. Purcell Jr.

Other Publications

No abstract provided.