Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (10)
- Law and Politics (10)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Law and Gender (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
-
- Legislation (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Arts and Humanities (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Procedure (1)
- Family Law (1)
- Intellectual Property Law (1)
- International Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Education (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- Philosophy (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Rule of Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Democracy (9)
- Philosophy (8)
- Politics (8)
- Religion (8)
- Government (7)
-
- History (7)
- Law (7)
- Theology (7)
- United States (7)
- Liberalism (3)
- Morality (3)
- Governance (2)
- Hans-Georg Gadamer (2)
- Hermeneutics (2)
- Legal philosophy (2)
- Loyalty (2)
- Political philosophy (2)
- Statutory interpretation (2)
- Textual interpretation (2)
- 1991 Civil Rights Act (1)
- Abuse of power (1)
- Adultery (1)
- Alexander Aleinikoff (1)
- American constitutional history (1)
- American legal history (1)
- Autonomous text (1)
- Beliefs (1)
- Blackmail (1)
- Book review (1)
- Brown v. Board of Education (1)
- Publication
-
- Ledewitz Papers (7)
- Michigan Law Review (4)
- Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (2)
- Publications (2)
-
- Reviews (2)
- Articles (1)
- Cardozo Law Review (1)
- Connecticut Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- San Diego Law Review (1)
- Scholarship Chronologically (1)
- UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review (1)
- Washington Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 31 of 31
Full-Text Articles in Law and Philosophy
Review Of Willful Liberalism: Voluntarism And Individuality In Political Theory And Practice, Donald J. Herzog
Review Of Willful Liberalism: Voluntarism And Individuality In Political Theory And Practice, Donald J. Herzog
Reviews
This is an elegant and studied little volume, rather more difficult than it lets on. Flathman wants to argue that liberals are sorely in need of a more robust understanding of the will and individuality than they now possess, that they (or we) should be enthusiastically embracing what might seem to be some tendentious commitments about the partial but inescapable opacity of other selves. He does so by working through a large number of texts and authors-some only contentiously called liberal (Hobbes); others not conceivably liberal (William of Ockham, Augustine, Nietzsche); and still others not obviously interested in anything narrowly …