Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Jurisprudence (5)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (5)
- Law and Gender (4)
-
- Law and Society (4)
- Criminal Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- International Law (2)
- Law and Economics (2)
- Legal Education (2)
- Legal Writing and Research (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Supreme Court of the United States (2)
- Civil Law (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Judges (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Natural Law (1)
- State and Local Government Law (1)
- Torts (1)
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Democracy (4)
- United States (4)
- Government (3)
- History (3)
- Law (3)
-
- Liberalism (3)
- Morality (3)
- Philosophy (3)
- Political theory (3)
- Politics (3)
- Religion (3)
- Theology (3)
- Decisionmaking (2)
- Eclecticism (2)
- Equal Protection Clause (2)
- Equality (2)
- Integration (2)
- Interpretation (2)
- Law and feminism (2)
- Legal theory and contemporary law (2)
- Translation (2)
- Utilitarianism (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Abuse (1)
- Actual consent (1)
- Adam Smith (1)
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1)
- Administrative implementation (1)
- Aesthetics (1)
- Affirmative right (1)
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (17)
- Ledewitz Papers (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (2)
- Publications (2)
-
- Book Chapters (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles and Papers (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Research Publications (1)
- Scholarly Publications (1)
- University of Richmond Law Review Symposium (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 36 of 36
Full-Text Articles in Law and Philosophy
Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes
Liberalism Republicanism And The Abortion Controversy, Gary C. Leedes
Law Faculty Publications
This article considers the abortion controversy in the context of intellectual history and political theory. It does not analyze the Supreme Court's recent abortion cases, rely upon formal legal reasoning, or predict how the Court will decide any cases currently pending on its docket. Instead, it examines the Court's current options in light of the intersecting and pliable traditions of liberalism and republicanism. ...
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B): Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation? Part Ii, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B): Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation? Part Ii, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In Part A of this essay, "The Killing Fields", I developed a critique of the disciplinary impulses that underlie modern law and legal theory. Invoking a number of perspectives and a plurality of analyses, I proposed that male-stream legal theory and contemporary law both assume as inevitable, and legitimize as appropriate, the funnelling of violence through law. The problem with a funnel, however, is that it does not curtail or reduce that which is channelled through it. On the contrary, to funnel is to condense and to intensify. Viewed from this perspective, interpreted from the bottom up, law and legal …
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B): Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation? Part I, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Nomos And Thanatos (Part B): Feminism As Jurisgenerative Transformation, Or Resistance Through Partial Incorporation? Part I, Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
In Part A of this essay, "The Killing Fields", I developed a critique of the disciplinary impulses that underlie modern law and legal theory. Invoking a number of perspectives and a plurality of analyses, I proposed that male-stream legal theory and contemporary law both assume as inevitable, and legitimize as appropriate, the funnelling of violence through law. The problem with a funnel, however, is that it does not curtail or reduce that which is channelled through it. On the contrary, to funnel is to condense and to intensify. Viewed from this perspective, interpreted from the bottom up, law and legal …
Reasons, Authority, And The Meaning Of 'Obey': Further Thoughts On Raz And Obedience To Law, Donald H. Regan
Reasons, Authority, And The Meaning Of 'Obey': Further Thoughts On Raz And Obedience To Law, Donald H. Regan
Articles
I recently published a long article' discussing a variety of topics from Joseph Raz's The Morality of Freedom.2 The article was part of a symposium on Raz's work in the Southern California Law Review. Raz responded' to the articles in that symposium, including my own. From a perspective which surveys the whole range of views on political philosophy, Raz's view and mine look very similar. Even so, we find many things to disagree about, which neither of us would regard as merely matters of detail. For the most part, we at least share a common understanding of our disagreements. But …
Synthesizing Related Rules From Statutes And Cases For Legal Expert Systems, Layman E. Allen, Sallyanne Payton, Charles S. Saxon
Synthesizing Related Rules From Statutes And Cases For Legal Expert Systems, Layman E. Allen, Sallyanne Payton, Charles S. Saxon
Articles
Different legal expert systems may be incompatible with each other: A user in characterizing the same situation by answering the questions presented in a consultation can be led to contradictory inferences. Such systems can be ”synthesized’ to help users avoid such contradictions by alerting them that other relevant systems are available to be consulted as they are responding to questions. An example of potentially incompatible, related legal expert systems is presented here - ones for the New Jersey murder statute and the celebrated Quinlan case, along with one way of synthesizing them to avoid such incompatibility.
Probing Bork's Judicial Philosophy, Gerard V. Bradley
Probing Bork's Judicial Philosophy, Gerard V. Bradley
Journal Articles
Robert Bork: The Tempting of America. (New York: The Free Press, 1989. Pp. xiv, 432. $22.50.)
In the last third of The Tempting of America Robert Bork relives the painful ordeal of his lost nomination to the Supreme Court. Any sentient American then alive already knows that story: the campaign against him was full of half-truths, distortions, and just plain lies. Bork adds some confirming anecdotes, and I congratulate him for telling the tale candidly but without rancor. The loss is ours. In my opinion, Bork would have been among the two or three greatest justices of the last …