Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (12)
- Law and Economics (7)
- Economics (6)
- Banking and Finance (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
-
- Corporations (4)
- Patents (4)
- Commercial Law (3)
- ITC (3)
- International Law (3)
- International Trade (3)
- International Trade Commission (3)
- Trade Regulation (3)
- Actavis (2)
- Agriculture Law (2)
- Antidumping (2)
- Antitrust law (2)
- Authorized generics (2)
- China (2)
- Civil Law (2)
- Competition (2)
- Conflict of Laws (2)
- Contracts (2)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Countervailing duties (2)
- Courts (2)
- EEC (2)
- Energy and Utilities Law (2)
- Environmental Law (2)
- Escape clause (2)
- Publication
-
- All Faculty Scholarship (6)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (6)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (2)
- Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (1)
-
- Camilo Ossa (1)
- Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment Staff Publications (1)
- Críspulo Marmolejo (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Herbert Hovenkamp (1)
- Jarrod Tudor (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Lynn A. Stout (1)
- Melanie S. Williams (1)
- Miguel Martínez (1)
- Nehal A. Patel (1)
- Sang Yop Kang (1)
- Scholarly Works (1)
- Seattle University Law Review (1)
- Shi-Ling Hsu (1)
- Tom Campbell (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 31 - 33 of 33
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
A Market-Oriented Analysis Of The 'Terminating Access Monopoly' Concept, Jonathan E. Nuechterlein, Christopher S. Yoo
A Market-Oriented Analysis Of The 'Terminating Access Monopoly' Concept, Jonathan E. Nuechterlein, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
Policymakers have long invoked the concept of a “terminating access monopoly” to inform communications policy. Roughly speaking, the concept holds that a consumer-facing network provider, no matter how small or how subject to retail competition, generally possesses monopoly power vis-à-vis third-party senders of communications traffic to its customers. Regulators and advocates have routinely cited that concern to justify regulatory intervention in a variety of contexts where the regulated party may or may not have possessed market power in any relevant retail market.
Despite the centrality of the terminating access monopoly to modern communications policy, there is surprisingly little academic literature …
Markets, Morals, And Limits In The Exchange Of Human Eggs, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Markets, Morals, And Limits In The Exchange Of Human Eggs, Kimberly D. Krawiec
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The E-Books Conspiracy: Crossing The Line Between Applying And Creating Law, Tom Campbell
The E-Books Conspiracy: Crossing The Line Between Applying And Creating Law, Tom Campbell
Tom Campbell
This article responds to John Kirkwood’s Collusion to Control a Powerful Customer: Amazon, E-Books, and Antitrust Policy. Professor Kirkwood argued that in a monopsonistic market (i.e., one where there exists one powerful buyer and many less powerful sellers), or a market in which a buyer has significantly more power than the sellers, collusion on the part of the sellers might be justified, and ought to be a defense to antitrust claims, under certain conditions. This article summarizes Kirkwood’s proposed requirements for invoking this defense and argues that they are overly prescriptive, failing to allow certain instances of beneficial collusion, imposing …