Land Use Law Commons^™

Lessons From The World Trade Center For Open Space Planning Generally And Boston's Big Data Specifically, Mary Clark

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

This paper looks to several land use planning issues at stake in both the World Trade Center redevelopment and Central Artery/ Tunnel Project, offering some lessons for the future of public open space planning with respect to the inºuence of the press, the centrality of politics, the urgency of addressing public and private claims of land ownership, the need to engage the public, and seizing the opportunity to create new public transportation links.

Comparative Land Use Law: Patterns Of Sustainability, John R. Nolon

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

Land use scholars and practitioners in the United States trace the development of domestic land use law to 1916, when the City of New York adopted the nation's first comprehensive zoning law, and then on to 1926 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared zoning constitutional in Euclid v. Ambler Realty. Some have studied European influences stemming from late nineteenth century regulations and the urban design principles imported from the great cities of the era. Others know about the catastrophic London fire of 1666 and how it transformed society's understanding of why individual property rights, to some degree, must be subject …

Regional Governance Reconsidered, Janice C. Griffith

Suffolk University Law School Faculty Works

The global economy’s regional scale of operation, social equity concerns, and environmental degradation that transcends local governmental boundary lines propel an examination of whether twenty-first century conditions call for the creation of regional governmental structures in the United States. This article argues that the need to spur economic competitiveness and metropolitan-wide planning and growth management will impel the formation of new regional governance structures. Forging stronger connections between central cities and surrounding suburban strongholds, however, will not be easy. The article discusses the many barriers that prevent fragmented local governments from reaping the benefits of regional cooperation, including localism, state …

Property And Environment: Thoughts On An Evolving Relationship, J. Peter Byrne

Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works

Private property is a necessary but insufficient tool for environmental regulation. Why is it necessary? There are several reasons. First, it settles who controls a resource, making rational management possible. While this may sound trivial, countries with weak or fragmented systems of ownership--or where enforcement of law is tainted by corruption--find it impossible even to begin to preserve resources or prevent pollution. This is especially the case when different individuals make conflicting claims to the same plot of land.

Second, private property owners have the incentive to preserve the capital value of their land. They can reap where they (or …

Questioning The Rule Of Capture Metaphor For Nineteenth Century Public Land Law: A Look At R.S. 2477, James R. Rasband

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Back To The Future Of Conservation: Changing Perceptions Of Property Rights & Environmental Protection, Jonathan H. Adler

Faculty Publications

Some environmental scholars and policymakers have been particularly critical of classical liberal conceptions of private property on both theoretical and practical grounds, suggesting that traditional notions of property rights are incompatible with the demands of environmental protection. Perceiving an environmental crisis borne from Lockean conceptions of property and capitalism, many environmental thinkers came to view the legal protection of private property as an obstacle to environmental sustainability. As a result, the development of command-and-control regulation in the 1960s and 1970s was influenced by the ecological critique of private property.

In recent years, however, the perception of private property's role in …

United States Court Of Federal Claims: Walker V. United States, Michael J. Graetz

Faculty Scholarship

Walker v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 222, (Fed. Cl. 2005) (granting motion for reconsideration upon finding that water, access and forage rights were legally distinct from surface estate rights determined in a prior action).