Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (222)
- Natural Resources Law (219)
- Administrative Law (203)
- Water Law (192)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (189)
-
- Energy and Utilities Law (187)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (178)
- Agriculture Law (171)
- Science and Technology Law (170)
- Cultural Heritage Law (169)
- Animal Law (162)
- Law and Race (126)
- Constitutional Law (80)
- Property Law and Real Estate (14)
- Agency (10)
- Civil Procedure (7)
- Supreme Court of the United States (6)
- Courts (5)
- Legislation (5)
- Litigation (5)
- State and Local Government Law (5)
- Law and Society (4)
- Civil Law (3)
- Government Contracts (3)
- Jurisdiction (3)
- Law and Economics (3)
- Legal Remedies (3)
- Religion Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Montana (11)
- Climate change (10)
- EPA (10)
- Environmental law (10)
- NEPA (9)
-
- BLM (8)
- Public lands (8)
- Clean Water Act (7)
- Environment (7)
- Indian law (7)
- Bureau of Land Management (6)
- CERCLA (6)
- Climate Change (6)
- Land use (6)
- Mining (6)
- Ninth Circuit (6)
- APA (5)
- Administrative law (5)
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (5)
- Conservation (5)
- Endangered Species Act (5)
- Environmental (5)
- Environmentalism (5)
- Natural resources law (5)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (5)
- Renewable energy (5)
- Water (5)
- Water law (5)
- EIS (4)
- ESA (4)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 150 of 241
Full-Text Articles in Land Use Law
The Other Non-Renewable Resource: Cultural Resource Protection In A Changing Energy Future, Wesley J. Furlong
The Other Non-Renewable Resource: Cultural Resource Protection In A Changing Energy Future, Wesley J. Furlong
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Epilogue: Progressive Populism’S Glory Days, Rick Applegate
Epilogue: Progressive Populism’S Glory Days, Rick Applegate
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Black Book, Rob Raney
History Of The Coal Tax, Thomas E. Towe
History Of The Coal Tax, Thomas E. Towe
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Wild River Bill: House Bill 133, Harrison Fagg
The Wild River Bill: House Bill 133, Harrison Fagg
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Stream Access Remembrance, Ron Waterman
Stream Access Remembrance, Ron Waterman
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Implementation Of Montana's Strip Mine Legislation, Leo Berry
Implementation Of Montana's Strip Mine Legislation, Leo Berry
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Water Use Act, Gary Wicks
The Water Use Act, Gary Wicks
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Little History And A Few Of Its Heroes, Daniel Kemmis
A Little History And A Few Of Its Heroes, Daniel Kemmis
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Retrospective: The Golden Years, Peter M. Meloy
A Retrospective: The Golden Years, Peter M. Meloy
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Hard Rock Mining Bill: House Bill 243, Harrison Fagg
The Hard Rock Mining Bill: House Bill 243, Harrison Fagg
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Senate Democratic Caucus Of 1975, Thomas E. Towe
The Senate Democratic Caucus Of 1975, Thomas E. Towe
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Epic Depate, Greg Jergeson
An Epic Depate, Greg Jergeson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
How House Bill 666 And Grass Roots Democracy Won Subdivision Reform For Montana, John Vincent
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
The Montana Environmental Information Center, Robin Nichols
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
The 1972 Montana State Constitution Declaration Of Rights And The Opportunities On The Bumpy Road Ahead, Rick Applegate
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
My Glory Days: How I Came To Be In The Right Place At The Right Time., Mae Nan Ellingson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
The Writing And Ratification Of The 1972 Montana Constitution, Bob Campbell
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Alice Creek, Dolores Colburg
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Montana (1959 – 1989) Political Evolution — Political Revolution, Ted Schwinden
Public Land & Resources Law Review
No abstract provided.
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Pakootas V. Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd., Connlan W. Whyte
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Throughout the twentieth century, Teck Cominco Metals leaked metal pollutants into the Upper Columbia River that ultimately entered the United States and the Colville Indian Reservation. In 2004, after almost a decade of working with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Colville Tribes initiated a citizen suit under CERCLA against Teck for damaging the ecosystem of the Upper Columbia River. In 2018, the Ninth Circuit affirmed judgment against Teck for recovery costs and attorney’s fees.
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Fmc Corp. V. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Seth T. Bonilla
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In 1998, FMC Corporation agreed to submit to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes’ permitting processes, including the payment of fees, for clean-up work required as part of consent decree negotiations with the Environmental Protection Agency. Then, in 2002, FMC refused to pay the Tribes under a permitting agreement entered into by both parties, even though the company continued to store hazardous waste on land within the Shoshone-Bannock Fort Hall Reservation in Idaho. FMC challenged the Tribes’ authority to enforce the $1.5 million permitting fees first in tribal court and later challenged the Tribes’ authority to exercise civil regulatory and adjudicatory jurisdiction over …
Preview—Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company: Allocation Of Remediation Costs Under Cercla, Nyles G. Greer
Preview—Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company: Allocation Of Remediation Costs Under Cercla, Nyles G. Greer
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals originally scheduled oral arguments in this matter for Tuesday, March 31, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in the William K. Nakamura Courthouse in Seattle, Washington. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Ninth Circuit has postponed oral arguments in this matter. While still subject to change due to the pandemic, the court has rescheduled oral arguments for April 27, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2 of the William K. Nakamura Courthouse in Seattle, Washington. Shannon Wells Stevenson will likely appear on behalf of the Appellant. Gregory Evans will likely appear on behalf of the Appellee.
Juliana V. United States, Anthony Reed
Juliana V. United States, Anthony Reed
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Plaintiffs sued the United States government for promoting activities that were known to pollute the atmosphere and cause climate change. They claimed the government’s policies violated their rights under the substantive due process clause of the Fifth Amendment, the equal protection clause of the Ninth Amendment, and the public trust doctrine. The Ninth Circuit held it was not within the court’s Article III power to create and oversee a comprehensive plan capable of redressing the Plaintiffs’ injuries and, therefore, Plaintiffs lacked standing.
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Navajo Nation V. United States Department Of The Interior, Adam W. Johnson
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Navajo Nation sued the United States government alleging the government breached its trust obligation over the allocation of water rights in the Colorado River Basin. On remand, the district court denied the Navajo Nation leave to file its third amended complaint for futility, holding that the general trust relationship was insufficient to support the Nation’s breach of trust claim.
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24, 2020, at 10 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will likely argue for the United States. In a divided oral argument, Paul D. Clement will likely appear for Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, the petitioner in consolidated case No. 18-1587, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association. Michael K. Kellogg will likely appear for the Respondents.