Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (236)
- American University Washington College of Law (173)
- University of Colorado Law School (96)
- University of Montana (80)
- University of Michigan Law School (42)
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (39)
- Fordham Law School (31)
- BLR (18)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (18)
- Pace University (14)
- University of Maine School of Law (14)
- Pepperdine University (10)
- UIC School of Law (9)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (8)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (7)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- Georgetown University Law Center (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (5)
- Cleveland State University (4)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (3)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- St. John's University School of Law (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Fifth Amendment (46)
- United States (45)
- Land use (43)
- Eminent domain (42)
- Constitutional Law (39)
-
- Zoning (36)
- Takings (34)
- Environmental law (30)
- Supreme Court (29)
- Constitutional law (28)
- Public lands (28)
- Constitution (25)
- Colorado (24)
- Just compensation (24)
- BLM (23)
- Land Use Planning (21)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (21)
- FLPMA (20)
- Law (19)
- Property rights (19)
- Takings clause (19)
- California (18)
- Climate change (18)
- Property (17)
- Regulatory takings (17)
- Property-Personal and Real (16)
- Congress (15)
- Environmental Law (15)
- Fifth amendment (15)
- Public trust doctrine (15)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (195)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (172)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (80)
- Michigan Law Review (41)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (29)
-
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- Touro Law Review (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (25)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (23)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- ExpressO (17)
- American Indian Law Journal (14)
- Faculty Scholarship (13)
- Maine Law Review (13)
- Scholarly Works (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (11)
- Articles (8)
- Cardozo Law Review (8)
- Colorado Water Issues and Options: The 90's and Beyond: Toward Maximum Beneficial Use of Colorado's Water Resources (October 8) (8)
- Pepperdine Law Review (8)
- UIC Law Review (8)
- Buffalo Law Review (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Works (3)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 751 - 780 of 904
Full-Text Articles in Land Use Law
“A One Way Ticket To Palookaville”: Supreme Court Takings Jurisprudence After Dolan And Its Implication For New York City’S Waterfront Zoning Resolution, Jill Illan Berger Inbar
“A One Way Ticket To Palookaville”: Supreme Court Takings Jurisprudence After Dolan And Its Implication For New York City’S Waterfront Zoning Resolution, Jill Illan Berger Inbar
Cardozo Law Review
This Note will use the Waterfront Ordinance as a vehicle for examining the new heightened scrutiny standard introduced in Dolan. Part I provides an overview of takings jurisprudence and the traditional pre-Nollan and pre-Dolan standards, which were applied to determine whether an exercise of police power oversteps its bounds and interferes with private property rights guaranteed under the Fifth Amendment. Part II reviews the new standards espoused by the Supreme Court in Nollan and Dolan. Part III describes the purpose of New York City's 1993. Waterfront Zoning Ordinance and discusses its history, objectives, and provisions. Part …
The Supreme Court's Land Use Decisions (Symposium - The Supreme Court And Local Government Law, 1993-94 Term), Leon D. Lazer
The Supreme Court's Land Use Decisions (Symposium - The Supreme Court And Local Government Law, 1993-94 Term), Leon D. Lazer
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Has The U.S. Supreme Court Finally Drained The Swamp Of Takings Jurisprudence? The Impact Of Lucas V. South Carolina Coastal Council On Wetlands And Coastal Barrier Beaches, Hope M. Babcock
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This article argues that the Court's reliance on the law of property neither creates an internal inconsistency in takings law nor necessarily leads to further destruction of natural resources. Background principles of property law, such as custom and public trust, have long provided a basis for government protection of the public's interest in certain types of land, like the barrier beach David Lucas sought to develop.
Thus, the Lucas case need not be perceived as casting a constitutional cloud over laws protecting important ecosystems like wetlands and barrier beaches. The decision may not place these resources in greater danger from …
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Letting The Fox Into The Henhouse Under Cover Of Section 5 Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Marci A. Hamilton
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act: Letting The Fox Into The Henhouse Under Cover Of Section 5 Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Marci A. Hamilton
Cardozo Law Review
The Religious Freedom Restoration Act ("RFRA") has now been in effect for over a year. RFRA is an understandable, but unconstitutional, attempt to supplement the contemporary Supreme Court's crabbed reading of the Free Exercise Clause. In a nutshell, RFRA sets the standard of review-the "compelling interest" test-to be applied to federal and state law burdening the free exercise of religious conduct. RFRA has already been employed to decide a series of cases, most of which were brought by prison inmates. The time rapidly approaches when the courts of appeals, and even the Supreme Court, will be asked to pass on …
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings: A Growing Battlefield, Barton H. Thompson, Jr.
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings: A Growing Battlefield, Barton H. Thompson, Jr.
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
43 pages.
Contains references.
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Management Approaches To Addressing Takings Issues: Endangered Species Protection, I. Michael Heyman
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulation Of Water Use And Takings—The Government Lawyer’S Perspective, Richard M. Frank
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
11 pages.
Contains 3 pages of references.
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Private Property Rights Protection Legislation Across The Nation, Nancie G. Marzulla
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages (includes 1 map).
Contains footnotes.
Takings And Water Rights [Includes Unsigned Annotations By David Getches], David H. Getches
Takings And Water Rights [Includes Unsigned Annotations By David Getches], David H. Getches
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
13 pages (includes 1 illustration).
Includes unsigned annotations by David Getches.
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, John D. Echeverria
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, John D. Echeverria
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages.
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Searching For Basinwide Solutions To Endangered Species Problems Of The South Platte Of Colorado, James S. Lochhead
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
42 pages (includes illustrations and map).
Contains endnotes.
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Taking Of Public Water And Land Resource Development Rights After Lucas, Jerome C. Muys
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
7 pages.
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
“Takings” And The Endangered Species Act, Oliver A. Houck
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
3 pages.
Mining Regulation And Takings, Mark Squillace
Mining Regulation And Takings, Mark Squillace
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
10 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Mining Regulation(S) And Takings, Lawrence G. Mcbride
Mining Regulation(S) And Takings, Lawrence G. Mcbride
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
12 pages.
Contains footnotes.
The Fifth Amendment And The Retained Sovereignty Doctrine: A Study Of The Endangered Species Act And The Central Valley Project Improvement Act As Applied To Central Valley Project Water Service Contracts, Brian E. Gray
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
12 pages.
What A Federal Natural Resource Management Agency Can Do To Avoid Takings, John D. Leshy
What A Federal Natural Resource Management Agency Can Do To Avoid Takings, John D. Leshy
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
6 pages.
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
The Endangered Species Act And Constitutional Takings, Robert Meltz
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
18 pages.
Contains references.
Mining Regulation And Takings, L. Thomas Galloway
Mining Regulation And Takings, L. Thomas Galloway
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Property Rights And Public Resources, Mark L. Pollot
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
City Of Tigard And Takings Law, Richard D. Lazarus
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
10 pages.
Contains 1 page of references.
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, Virginia S. Albrecht
Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, Virginia S. Albrecht
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
52 pages.
Contains footnotes.
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Agenda: Regulatory Takings And Resources: What Are The Constitutional Limits?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center, Byron R. White Center For The Study Of American Constitutional Law
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
Sponsored by the University of Colorado's Natural Resources Law Center and the Byron R. White Center for American Constitutional Study.
Conference organizers, faculty and/or moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Gene R. Nichol, Jr. and Mark Squillace.
Governmental regulation for environmental protection and other important public purposes can affect the manner in which land and natural resources are developed and used. The U.S. constitution (and most state constitutions) prohibit the government from "taking" property without payment of compensation. Originally intended to apply to situations where the government physically seized private property …
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Takings And Retroactivity, Jan G. Laitos
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
25 pages.
Contains references.
The Law Of Takings: An Introduction: Property, Takings And The Evolution Of Resource Regulation, Carol M. Rose
The Law Of Takings: An Introduction: Property, Takings And The Evolution Of Resource Regulation, Carol M. Rose
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
7 pages.
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Floodplain And Wetland Regulatory “Takings”, Jon A. Kusler
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
4 pages.
The Regulatory Takings Doctrine: A Critical Overview, J. Peter Byrne
The Regulatory Takings Doctrine: A Critical Overview, J. Peter Byrne
Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15)
15 pages.
Due Process: Unification Theological Seminary V. City Of Poughkeepsie
Due Process: Unification Theological Seminary V. City Of Poughkeepsie
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seqra’S Too Valuable To Trash: A Reply To Stewart Sterk, Philip Weinberg
Seqra’S Too Valuable To Trash: A Reply To Stewart Sterk, Philip Weinberg
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.