Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (3)
- Ad hoc (1)
- Administrative (1)
- Appellate (1)
- Approach (1)
-
- Balancing (1)
- Codification (1)
- Congress (1)
- Contempt (1)
- Corporation (1)
- Cumulative (1)
- Defendant (1)
- Exception (1)
- Finality (1)
- Foreign (1)
- General (1)
- Gillespie (1)
- Interlocutory (1)
- Interpretation (1)
- Judge (1)
- Judicial (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Justiciability (1)
- Legislative (1)
- Ministerial (1)
- Morrison v. Olson (1)
- Personal (1)
- Plaintiff (1)
- Policy (1)
- Political question doctrine (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Jurisdiction
Of Hats And Robes: Judicial Review Of Nonadjudicative Article Iii Functions, Jeffrey L. Rensberger
Of Hats And Robes: Judicial Review Of Nonadjudicative Article Iii Functions, Jeffrey L. Rensberger
University of Richmond Law Review
We are accustomed to thinking of Article III courts and judges deciding cases and controversies. But, federal judges and courts have historically also engaged in official but nonadjudicative activities. In addition to a history of federal judges serving on nonjudicial commissions, federal judges and the Supreme Court participate in the rulemaking process for the federal procedural and evidentiary rules. Although some argue to the contrary, the Supreme Court has approved such arrangements in the face of separation of powers objections. Since Article III officers and courts perform nonadjudicative duties, the question arises of how federal courts who address a challenge …
When Is It Necessary For Corporations To Be Essentially At Home?: An Exploration Of Exceptional Cases, Priscilla Heinz
When Is It Necessary For Corporations To Be Essentially At Home?: An Exploration Of Exceptional Cases, Priscilla Heinz
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Dizzying Gillespie: The Exaggerated Death Of The Balancing Approach And The Inescapable Allure Of Flexibility In Appellate Jurisdiction, Bryan Lammon
University of Richmond Law Review
In Part I, I provide necessary background on the current re- gime of federal appellate jurisdiction before turning to the rise and fall of Gillespie and the balancing approach. Part I concludes by explaining how inconsistent Gillespie and the balancing approach are with the Supreme Court's current approach to appellate jurisdiction. Part II turns to five areas in which the balancing approach persists in the courts of appeals and demonstrates the influence of the balancing approach, and the often case-by-case nature of decision-making, in each of these areas. And in Part III, I explore the implications of the balancing approach's …
The Complexities Of Judicial Takings, D. Benjamin Barros
The Complexities Of Judicial Takings, D. Benjamin Barros
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Independent Of The Constitution?--Issues Raised By An Independent Federal Legislative Ethics Commission With Independent Enforcement Authority, Paul Taylor
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.