Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (57)
- Constitutional Law (23)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Law and Politics (12)
- Legal History (12)
-
- Supreme Court of the United States (11)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (10)
- Civil Procedure (8)
- Legal Profession (8)
- Law and Society (7)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (7)
- Legislation (7)
- Litigation (6)
- President/Executive Department (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Criminal Procedure (4)
- Jurisdiction (4)
- Rule of Law (4)
- Family Law (3)
- Fourteenth Amendment (3)
- Legal Biography (3)
- Religion Law (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Election Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (19)
- United States Supreme Court (18)
- Judges (15)
- William Matthew Byrne Jr. (9)
- Attorney (8)
-
- Constitutional Law (8)
- Judge (7)
- Judicial process (7)
- Judiciary (7)
- Court (6)
- Judicial opinions (6)
- Lawyer (6)
- California (5)
- Constitutional law (5)
- Litigation (5)
- Politics (5)
- Judicial (4)
- Justices (4)
- Law (4)
- Trial (4)
- United States (4)
- Article III (3)
- Buck v. Bell (3)
- California. Supreme Court (3)
- Case (3)
- Constitution (3)
- Democracy (3)
- Discretion (3)
- Dred Scott v. Sandford (3)
- Due process (3)
Articles 61 - 90 of 99
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Korematsu V. United States: A Tragedy Hopefully Never To Be Repeated , Erwin Chemerinsky
Korematsu V. United States: A Tragedy Hopefully Never To Be Repeated , Erwin Chemerinsky
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Redeeming Erie: A Response To Suzanna Sherry , Donald Earl Childress Iii
Redeeming Erie: A Response To Suzanna Sherry , Donald Earl Childress Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wrong, Out Of Step, And Pernicious: Erie As The Worst Decision Of All Time, Suzanna Sherry
Wrong, Out Of Step, And Pernicious: Erie As The Worst Decision Of All Time, Suzanna Sherry
Pepperdine Law Review
This essay was written for “Supreme Mistakes: Exploring the Most Maligned Decisions in Supreme Court History.” A symposium on the worst Supreme Court decision of all time risks becoming an exercise best described by Claude Rains’s memorable line in Casablanca: “Round up the usual suspects.” Two things saved this symposium from that fate. First, each of the usual suspects was appointed defense counsel, which made things more interesting. Second, a new face found its way into the line-up: Erie Railroad v. Tompkins. My goal in this essay is to explain why Erie is in fact guiltier than all of the …
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Putting Buck V. Bell In Scientific And Historical Context: A Response To Victoria Nourse , Edward J. Larson
Pepperdine Law Review
In this article written for a law-review symposium in response to a presentation on the infamous 1927 U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Buck v. Bell, Edward J. Larson argues that, at the time that the case was decided, eugenics was on the incline, not the decline. In the 1920s, the American scientific and medical community broadly backed eugenic remedies for various forms of mental illness and retardation. Legislatures, lawyers, and jurists took their cue from this scientific and medical consensus. Absent any question that the statute at issue in Buck v. Bell was validly passed by the Virginia legislature or …
Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World, Victoria Nourse
Buck V. Bell: A Constitutional Tragedy From A Lost World, Victoria Nourse
Pepperdine Law Review
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, which dealt with the forced sterilization of people deemed unfit, such as intellectually disabled or mentally retarded individuals. Topics include the enforceability of unconstitutional judicial decisions, eugenic sterilization, and the application of substantive due process.
A Reluctant Apology For Plessy: A Response To Akhil Amar, Barry P. Mcdonald
A Reluctant Apology For Plessy: A Response To Akhil Amar, Barry P. Mcdonald
Pepperdine Law Review
A response to the article "Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon," by Akhil Amar, published in the November 2011 issue of the "Pepperdine Law Review," is presented. Topics include an examination of Justice Henry Billings Brown's decision in the case, the constitutionality of segregating U.S. citizens by race, and the impact of public opinion on U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Plessy V. Ferguson And The Anti-Canon, Akhil Reed Amar
Plessy V. Ferguson And The Anti-Canon, Akhil Reed Amar
Pepperdine Law Review
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, which dealt with the constitutionality of racial segregation in the U.S. Topics include the application of precedent in controversial U.S. Supreme Court cases, when the U.S. Constitution can overrule a court decision, and dissenting judicial opinions.
Coming To Terms With Dred Scott: A Response To Daniel A. Farber, Paul Finkelman
Coming To Terms With Dred Scott: A Response To Daniel A. Farber, Paul Finkelman
Pepperdine Law Review
When thinking about Dred Scott, the issue is not how do we “rehabilitate” the opinion. The goal of scholarship here is to understand the opinion, place it in the context of its own time, and explain its enduring significance. After that, we may praise or damn it, and rehabilitate it or condemn it. No one today likes the Dred Scott opinion or the result. But, this article argues that Professor Daniel A. Farber is so incensed by the opinion that he vastly overstates its historical significance including incorrectly blaming Chief Justice Taney for causing the Civil War. This article rejects …
Anti-Canonical Considerations, Edward J. Larson
Anti-Canonical Considerations, Edward J. Larson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
The Propriety Of Jury Questioning: A Remedy For Perceived Harmless Error, Laurie Forbes Neff
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Swing Votes On The Current Supreme Court: The Joint Opinion In Casey And Its Progeny, R. Randall Kelso, Charles D. Kelso
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley
The Rule Of Law For Judges, Thomas M. Reavley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Efficiency In Asbestos Litigation, Alfred Chiantelli
Judicial Efficiency In Asbestos Litigation, Alfred Chiantelli
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Filibuster Of Judicial Nominations: Constitutional Crisis Or Politics As Usual?, Arthur L. Rizer Iii
The Filibuster Of Judicial Nominations: Constitutional Crisis Or Politics As Usual?, Arthur L. Rizer Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Have We Come Full Circle? Judicial Sentencing Discretion Revived In Booker And Fanfan, Sandra D. Jordan
Have We Come Full Circle? Judicial Sentencing Discretion Revived In Booker And Fanfan, Sandra D. Jordan
Pepperdine Law Review
The much anticipated Supreme Court decision in United States v. Booker and Fanfan has both invalidated the mandatory nature of the federal Sentencing Guidelines as well as restored judicial discretion for federal judges. With the Booker decision there is a renewed opportunity to correct some of the imbalance that came about as a result of the mandatory guidelines and the sentencing policies of the past twenty years. Booker has implications for all future sentencing as the power between the judiciary and the jury has been realigned and the power of the government has been reduced. Sentencing cannot accomplish legitimate goals …
Judicial Recusal And Disqualification: The Need For A Per Se Rule On Friendship (Not Acquaintance), Jeremy M. Miller
Judicial Recusal And Disqualification: The Need For A Per Se Rule On Friendship (Not Acquaintance), Jeremy M. Miller
Pepperdine Law Review
Legal Ethics rules have become both more objective and more specific. There are already enemy rules for recusal. The recent debacle of the Antonin Scalia/Dick Cheney hunting trip when VP Cheney was a named defendant, and Scalia's refusal to disqualify himself shows there is a problem. But Scalia was correct, friendship does not mandate recusal. However, friendship, properly defined, as herein, must be added to the recusal factors. Former Chief Justice Rehnquist refusing to disqualify himself when he was involved in a lower court case as prosecutor caused an analogous change in the judicial conduct rules. This paper traces case …
"Of A Judiciary Nature": Observations On Chief Justice's First Opinions, Diane S. Sykes
"Of A Judiciary Nature": Observations On Chief Justice's First Opinions, Diane S. Sykes
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To Matt Byrne, John Van De Kamp
Friend, Mentor, Colleague: A Tribute To Judge Matt Byrne, Pamela Rymer
Friend, Mentor, Colleague: A Tribute To Judge Matt Byrne, Pamela Rymer
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judge William Matthew Byrne: An Irish Reflection, Mark H. Tuohey Iii
Judge William Matthew Byrne: An Irish Reflection, Mark H. Tuohey Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Remarks Matt Byrne Memorial June 23, 2006, Ron L. Olson
Remarks Matt Byrne Memorial June 23, 2006, Ron L. Olson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Lessons Learned From Matt, A. Howard Matz
The Judicial Appointment Process, John Tunney
The Judicial Appointment Process, John Tunney
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Matt Byrne, Michael Lightfoot
"Momentous Changes Taking Place" Matt Byrne's Leadership Role In Dialogue With The U.S.S.R., Weyman I. Lundquist
"Momentous Changes Taking Place" Matt Byrne's Leadership Role In Dialogue With The U.S.S.R., Weyman I. Lundquist
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Introduction, Warren Christopher
The Roberts Court & Executive Power, Jeffrey Rosen
The Roberts Court & Executive Power, Jeffrey Rosen
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Alito/O'Connor Switch, Joan Biskupic
Introduction To Symposium: An Enigmatic Court? Examining The Roberts Court As It Begins Year Three, Douglas W. Kmiec, Kenneth W. Starr
Introduction To Symposium: An Enigmatic Court? Examining The Roberts Court As It Begins Year Three, Douglas W. Kmiec, Kenneth W. Starr
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Inaugural William French Smith Memorial Lecture: A Look At Supreme Court Advocacy With Justice Samuel Alito, Samuel A. Alito Jr, Douglas W. Kmiec, Carter G. Phillips, Kenneth W. Starr
The Inaugural William French Smith Memorial Lecture: A Look At Supreme Court Advocacy With Justice Samuel Alito, Samuel A. Alito Jr, Douglas W. Kmiec, Carter G. Phillips, Kenneth W. Starr
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.