Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (34)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (7)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- State and Local Government Law (6)
- Civil Procedure (4)
-
- Election Law (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Legal Writing and Research (4)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Legal History (3)
- Criminal Procedure (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Law and Politics (2)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Common Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Evidence (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Insurance Law (1)
- Legal Biography (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Property Law and Real Estate (1)
- Religion Law (1)
- Sexuality and the Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (20)
- Guthrie (7)
- Magistrate (6)
- Blinders (5)
- ADR (4)
-
- Feminism (4)
- Gender (4)
- Jurisprudence (4)
- Justice (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Judge (3)
- Hug (2)
- Mediation (2)
- Nevada (2)
- Opinions (2)
- Religion (2)
- Settlement (2)
- Abortion (1)
- Anastasoff (1)
- Appointment (1)
- Apprendi (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Arbitrator (1)
- Archie (1)
- Article I (1)
- Barrett (1)
- Bayesian (1)
- Behavior (1)
- Bernard (1)
- Bias (1)
Articles 31 - 60 of 67
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Lynch And The Lunacy Of Secularized Religion, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Lynch And The Lunacy Of Secularized Religion, Frederick Mark Gedicks
Nevada Law Journal
Any “worst opinion ever” essay must start with criteria of badness. I propose three: (i) failure to explain why existing doctrine dictated the result, (ii) failure to articulate a rule that judges can consistently apply in subsequent cases, and (iii) failure to protect the interests of the prevailing party. Few opinions win this trifecta, but Lynch v. Donnelly is one of them.1 Chief Justice Burger and the Lynch majority would have left the world of church and state immeasurably enriched—or at least immeasurably less screwed up—if they had not written an opinion at all.
This is, to be sure, a …
Nigro V. United States: The Most Disingenuous Supreme Court Opinion, Ever, A. Christopher Bryant
Nigro V. United States: The Most Disingenuous Supreme Court Opinion, Ever, A. Christopher Bryant
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Globe Refining Co. V. Landa Cotton Oil Co. And The Dark Side Of Reputation, Larry T. Garvin
Globe Refining Co. V. Landa Cotton Oil Co. And The Dark Side Of Reputation, Larry T. Garvin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Blackmun (And Scalia) At The Bat: The Court's Separation-Of-Powers Strike Out In Freytag, Tuan Samahon
Blackmun (And Scalia) At The Bat: The Court's Separation-Of-Powers Strike Out In Freytag, Tuan Samahon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tending To Potted Plants: The Professional Identity Vacuum In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Tending To Potted Plants: The Professional Identity Vacuum In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Circumstance And Strategy: Jointly Authored Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Krugman Ray
Circumstance And Strategy: Jointly Authored Supreme Court Opinions, Laura Krugman Ray
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Rethinking Judicial Disqualification Based On Campaign Contributions: A Practical Critique Of Post-Caperton Proposals And A Call For Greater Transparency, Ryan M. Mcinerney
Rethinking Judicial Disqualification Based On Campaign Contributions: A Practical Critique Of Post-Caperton Proposals And A Call For Greater Transparency, Ryan M. Mcinerney
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Independence: A Call For Reform, Terence J. Lau
Judicial Independence: A Call For Reform, Terence J. Lau
Nevada Law Journal
According to retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, judicial independence is threatened now more so than any other time throughout history. Attacks on the judiciary have crossed the line from legitimate criticism to partisan harangues that threaten the ability of judges to rule fairly and without bias. This Article begins with a historical look at judicial independence as it has shaped the Supreme Court, including the impeachment of Samuel Chase, Ex Parte McCardle and the court-packing plan and concludes with a call for reform to the judicial appointment process to permit greater transparency in judicial selection.
Thoughts On Misjudging Misjudging, Stephen N. Subrin
Thoughts On Misjudging Misjudging, Stephen N. Subrin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Misjudging, Chris Guthrie
Judging Judges And Dispute Resolution Processes, John Lande
Judging Judges And Dispute Resolution Processes, John Lande
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Nobody's Perfect, Stephan Landsman
Mis(Understanding)Judging, Philip M. Pro
Misjudging: Implications For Dispute Resolution, Donna Shestowsky
Misjudging: Implications For Dispute Resolution, Donna Shestowsky
Nevada Law Journal
In the lead symposium article, Chris Guthrie describes recent research demonstrating empirically that judges, just like other people, are affected by cognitive, informational, and attitudinal blinders. He argues that these blinders promote inaccurate trial outcomes and, as a result, disputants might find trials less desirable for resolving disputes. In her response, Shestowsky argues that these findings might not affect disputants in the way that Guthrie supposes because disputants are not primarily guided by outcome accuracy considerations when evaluating dispute resolution procedures. Rather, when choosing procedures, they prefer ones that they expect to deliver outcomes that will advance their self-interests. When …
Evidentiary Wisdom And Blinders In Perspective: Thoughts On Misjudging, Elaine W. Shoben
Evidentiary Wisdom And Blinders In Perspective: Thoughts On Misjudging, Elaine W. Shoben
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
On Misjudging And Its Implications For Criminal Defendants, Their Lawyers And The Criminal Justice System, Rodney J. Uphoff
On Misjudging And Its Implications For Criminal Defendants, Their Lawyers And The Criminal Justice System, Rodney J. Uphoff
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
But What Will They Do Without Unpublished Opinions?: Some Alternatives For Dealing With The Ninth Circuit's Massive Caseload Post F.R.A.P. 32.1, Bryan Wright
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Predilections, John Paul Stevens
Justice Miriam Shearing: Nevada's Trailblazing Minimalist, Mary Berkheiser
Justice Miriam Shearing: Nevada's Trailblazing Minimalist, Mary Berkheiser
Nevada Law Journal
Nevada Supreme Court Justice Miriam Shearing retired at the end of her second term on January 4, 2005. Over the nearly thirty years of her very public life on the bench, many have ,written of her accomplishments as the first woman to enter the brotherhood of the Nevada judiciary.' With Justice Shearing's retirement, the time is ripe for an examination of her judicial decisions during the twelve years she served on the Nevada Supreme Court. The analysis here provides one perspective on her body of work. It begins, as it must, with a glimpse into the person behind the work.
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Public Financing Of Judicial Campaigns: Practices And Prospects , Michael W. Bowers
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Malignant Democracy: Core Fallacies Underlying Election Of The Judiciary, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection And Evaluation, Center For Democratic Culture At Unlv
Judicial Selection And Evaluation, Center For Democratic Culture At Unlv
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Remedying Judicial Foot-In-Mouth Disease: Nevada's Prohibitions Against Judicial Commentary On Evidence And The Rule Of Harmless Error, Andrew F. Dixon
Remedying Judicial Foot-In-Mouth Disease: Nevada's Prohibitions Against Judicial Commentary On Evidence And The Rule Of Harmless Error, Andrew F. Dixon
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Judicial Mediation And Signaling, Edward J. Brunet
Judicial Mediation And Signaling, Edward J. Brunet
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Chief Judge Procter Hug, Jr. And The Split That Didn't Happen, Arthur D. Hellman
Chief Judge Procter Hug, Jr. And The Split That Didn't Happen, Arthur D. Hellman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tribute Foreword, Carl Tobias
A Tribute To The Honorable Procter Hug, Jr. , Mary M. Schroeder
A Tribute To The Honorable Procter Hug, Jr. , Mary M. Schroeder
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
A Tribute To The Honorable Procter Hug, Jr. , James R. Browning
A Tribute To The Honorable Procter Hug, Jr. , James R. Browning
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congratulations To Judge Procter R. Hug, Jr., Melvin J. Brunetti
Congratulations To Judge Procter R. Hug, Jr., Melvin J. Brunetti
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Congratulations To Judge Procter R. Hug, Jr., Barry G. Silverman
Congratulations To Judge Procter R. Hug, Jr., Barry G. Silverman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.