Judges Commons^™

Justice Without Justices, John O. Mcginnis

Articles

No abstract provided.

Buried Voices, Dominant Themes: Justice Hans Linde And The Move To Structural Constitutional Interpretation, Marci A. Hamilton

Articles

No abstract provided.

The Judges V. The People: Judicial Independence And Democratic Ideals, Abner J. Mikva

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Literary Formalism, Legal Formalism, Jeffrey Malkan

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg: The First Jewish Woman On The United States Supreme Court, Malvina Halberstam

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg And The Virginia Military Institute: A Culmination Of Strategic Success, Scott M. Smiler

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines Justice Ginsburg's pivotal role in shaping the Supreme Court's approach to gender-based discrimination, particularly through her advocacy for heightened scrutiny of such classifications. It highlights how her efforts culminated in the landmark decision of United States v. Virginia, where the Court ruled that Virginia Military Institute's (VMI) exclusion of women violated the Equal Protection Clause. The decision reinforced the requirement that gender-based classifications must meet an exceedingly persuasive justification, aligning with Ginsburg's long-standing commitment to dismantling gender stereotypes and advancing equal protection principles.

To Resign Or Not To Resign, Stephen Ellmann

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justice Stillborn: Lies, Lacunae, Incommensurability, And The Judicial Role, E. Nathaniel Gates

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Preface, Norman L. Greene

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Tribute To Justice William J. Brennan, Jr., Clifton S. Elgarten

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Judge's Dilemma: Duty Or Conscience?, Robert W. Sweet

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Justices At Work: An Introduction, Michel Rosenfeld

Cardozo Law Review

"Justices at Work," a day long conference which took place on September 19, 1995 at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, brought together Justices and constitutional scholars from seven different countries to consider a hypothetical constitutional case dealing with fundamental rights. This issue of the Law Review includes the facts of the hypothetical case, the applicable hypothetical statute, the briefs submitted to the International Moot Courtall of which were the product of a collaborative effort among the seven scholars involved-as well as a transcript of the proceedings and of the deliberations of the seven Justices: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg …

Minority Protection In Residential Private Governments, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

The article explores the balance between majority rule and minority protections in community associations, drawing parallels with corporate governance to address conflicts and self-dealing issues. It argues that while market forces and self-interest often mitigate harmful majority actions, legal safeguards are necessary to protect minority interests, particularly when idiosyncratic value is at stake. The article advocates for express protections in governing documents and the use of supermajorities to limit association power, emphasizing that courts should invalidate redistributive actions without compensation.

Judicial Plagiarism: It May Be Fair Use But Is It Ethical?, Jaime S. Dursht

Cardozo Law Review

Plagiarism is the intentional appropriation of the creative product or scholarship of another without attribution. Judicial plagiarism arises when judges author opinions that employ materials from copyrighted sources such as law journals or books, but neglect to give credit to the author. In opinion writing-a form of writing in which use and citation to authority is customary-the offense of plagiarism lies simply in neglecting to identify the source. In the academic world, plagiarism is considered to be a "capital offense, punishable by academic death for student or faculty," and it is treated no more favorably in professions in which responsible …

Property, Parenthood, And Peonage: Reflections On The Return To Status Quo Antebellum, Margaret A. Burnham

Cardozo Law Review

Cheryl Harris demonstrates how intertwining racial and gender boundaries, whose shadows are long, longstanding, and ominous, were initially constructed around the legal principle of human chattel as personal property. She insightfully argues that slavery inextricably linked the concepts of race and property in the American legal imagination; that property originates from rules that are "racially coded" and determined. Cheryl Harris's contribution to this Symposium is a continuation of her project of illuminating how law ratifies and implements a racialized conception of property. This comment considers the application of Professor Harris's argument, that property, in the context of race-based slavery, is …

Freestanding Legal Pragmatism, Thomas C. Grey

Cardozo Law Review

John Rawls has recently presented liberalism as a political philosophy that can stand free of the comprehensive moral and metaphysical views with which it has been associated. You don't have to be a neo-Kantian like Rawls, so he argues, to accept his Kantiansounding theory of justice. Millian utilitarians, Aristotelian perfectionists, and Thomistic theists can also commit to the basic liberal rights: democratic government, freedom of speech and religion, equal opportunity, the rule of law, private property, and a welfare safety net. Rawls believes that there is no need for citizens to resolve their deepest philosophical disagreements in order to be …

Pragmatism And Realism, Hilary Putnam

Cardozo Law Review

Let me begin by asking what will undoubtedly seem to many, if not all of you, a most peculiar question: How did it happen that the first philosopher to present a completely worked out version of direct realism in the entire history of modem philosophy was none other than the American pragmatist, William James?

Pragmatic Adjudication, Richard A. Posner

Cardozo Law Review

Pragmatism is at one level a philosophical position, just as scientific realism, transcendental idealism, existentialism, utilitarianism, and logical positivism are. It is the level well illustrated by a recently published book in which Richard Rorty and his critics go at each other hammer and tongs over such questions as whether language reflects reality, whether free will is compatible with a scientific outlook, and whether such questions are even meaningful. It is not the level at which this paper is pitched. My concern is with an issue in "applied" pragmatism, although after listening to Professor Grey's talk at the conference about …

Pragmatism And Law: A Response To David Luban, Richard Rorty

Cardozo Law Review

Judge Posner's "Pragmatic Adjudication" is enormously refreshing. It cuts through an immense amount of tiresome and pointless talk about "the nature of law" and "the relation of law to politics" and gets down to the question: how should appellate court judges in a particular country at a particular time do their work? It not only argues lucidly for a particular answer to that question, but it also gives a good sense of what it must be like to be in Judge Posner's shoes. Posner helps you understand what sorts of things judges have to worry about, and what sorts of …

It’S A Positivist, It’S A Pragmatist, It’S A Codifier! Reflections On Nietzsche And Stendhal, Richard H. Weisberg

Cardozo Law Review

Richard Rorty writes that "[n]owadays, Allan Bloom and Michael Moore seem to be the only people who still think pragmatism is dangerous to the moral health of our society." Given the source, I would not contest the generalization. Nor would I seek to correct the adjective about pragmatism used more than once by Professors Rorty and Grey: "banal." Indeed, the popularity of pragmatism may reflect its banality. Its amorphous nature has produced strange alliances. For example, the same Stanley Fish who once declared Richard Posner's humanistic forays to be "execrable" now joins Posner's pragmatic program almost without qualification. If Pragmatism's …

Constitutional Adjudication In Light Of Discourse Theory, András Sajó

Cardozo Law Review

In the last one hundred years the empirical consequences of applied rationality have destroyed the last remnants of the trust in reason (Vernunftvertrauen). Postmodern law suffers from its own contradictory trends, which may be cured according to social practices indicated by discourse theory. In Between Facts and Norms, Jurgen Habermas applies the theoretical scheme of communicative action in a specific argumentation context, namely to legal discourse.

"Do Justice!": Variations Of A Thrice-Told Tale, Michael Herz

Articles

Although recent debates would suggest that narrative scholarship is brand new,4 lawyers, judges, and law professors, like all humankind, have always offered stories for illustration or support or to make a point in an indirect, and often more effective, way. Learned Hand's story about telling Justice Holmes to "do justice" is one widely-used example, offered by many writers in addition to Judge Bork and Professor Chayes. Its popularity is easy to understand. The story has a substantive message, pithily expressed, on a basic jurisprudential issue; it involves two members of the pantheon; and it crams a lot of human interest …

The Journey Into Activism, Bernhard Schlink

Cardozo Law Review

In Anna Karenina, Leo Tolstoy teaches us that all happy families are alike and only unhappy families are different. It is the same with courts that engage in constitutional review. All happy constitutional courts, that is, all happily activist constitutional courts are alike and only those that do not play an activist role are different.

Constitutional Justice And Democracy, Michel Troper

Cardozo Law Review

The issue of the compatibility of constitutional justice and democracy is considered in a particular way in France, for reasons relating both to the history of the legal culture and tothe peculiarities of the Constitutional Council, the institution which reviews the constitutionality of legislation.

The One True Sense, Georgia Warnke

Cardozo Law Review

In his Legal and Political Hermeneutics, Francis Lieber claims that "No sentence, or form of words, can have more than one 'true sense,' and this is the only one we have to inquire for." He criticizes efforts to write all possible specifications into the laws and regulations with which a legal and political hermeneutics is concerned, as if the necessity of interpretation could simply be avoided. "Men," he writes, "have at length found out that little or nothing is gained by attempting to speak with absolute clearness and endless specifications, but that human speech is clearer, the less we …

Legal And Political Hermeneutics, Or Principles Of Interpretation And Construction In Law And Politics, With Remarks On Precedents And Authorities, Francis Lieber

Cardozo Law Review

The second edition of the Hermeneutics was published in 1839, and has now been out of print for almost forty years. In 1860 Dr. Lieber carefully revised it, and made additions to both text and notes, expecting to publish a third edition, with a second part, of "Special Hermeneutics, or Legal Rules of Interpretation and Construction," by an eminent member of the New York Bar, Mr. William Curtis Noyes. This plan, however, was not carried out, and Mr. Noyes died December 25, 1863, without having written his proposed part. The text of the present edition, and Dr. Lieber's own notes, …

"Fetch Some Soupmeat", William N. Eskridge Jr.

Cardozo Law Review

Although first published over 150 years ago, Francis Lieber's Legal and Political Hermeneutics remains broadly influential, and the soupmeat hypothetical in particular has been reproduced in the most widely read twentieth-century legal texts for teaching statutory interpretation. The directive, "fetch some soupmeat," seems straightforward in most situations, because the housekeeper and the servant are operating under the same assumptions, and because their shared assumptions are borne out as the servant goes about his task. Lieber's project-and the project of any sophisticated theoretical treatment of statutory interpretation-was to explore the many ways in which "fetch some soupmeat" proves susceptible to surprising …

Judicial Drag: An Essay On Wigs, Robes And Legal Change, Charles M. Yablon

Articles

The article explores the persistence of judicial wigs and robes in England, arguing that their continued use is not based on practical reasons but on historical and cultural path dependency. The tradition, despite its anachronistic nature, endures due to factors like dignity, anonymity, and economic interests, rather than any functional necessity. The author suggests that such legal customs often persist because of historical context rather than optimal design.

Some Implications Of Daubert And Its Potential For Misuse: Misapplication To Environmental Tort Cases And Abuse Of Rule 706(A) Court-Appointed Experts, Ellen Relkin

Cardozo Law Review

This Commentary will address an array of issues underlying and emerging from the disputes in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and its inevitable progeny, from a practitioner's perspective representing plaintiffs in toxic tort litigation. It is intended to provide real examples that debunk the quaint but unrealistic notion that science is pure and insulated from economics and politics, the propagandized suggestion that it is the plaintiff's expert who promotes "fringe" or "junk" science, and the belief that epidemiology is the sine qua non of proving causation of a disease. It will also address the potential perils of the …

Should Federal Evidence Rules Trump State Tort Policy? The Federalism Values Daubert Ignored, Michael H. Gottesman

Cardozo Law Review

I want to explore issues that the Supreme Court should have addressed in Daubert but did not. The Court decided that Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence ("FRE") assigns a "gatekeeping" function to federal trial judges, who are to exclude expert scientific opinions that do not meet a standard of "reliability" vaguely sketched out in the Court's opinion.

The Daubert case involved exclusively state substantive law issues and was in federal court only because the defendant removed it from state court on the basis of diversity of citizenship. The Court held the gatekeeping function applicable in diversity actions, …