Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (218)
- Jurisprudence (214)
- Constitutional Law (210)
- Law and Society (209)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (203)
-
- Jurisdiction (203)
- State and Local Government Law (203)
- Legal History (202)
- Legal Profession (202)
- Supreme Court of the United States (202)
- Legal Education (200)
- Legislation (200)
- Law and Politics (199)
- Rule of Law (199)
- Other Law (198)
- Criminal Law (197)
- Law and Race (197)
- Legal Biography (196)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (196)
- Criminal Procedure (195)
- Evidence (195)
- Civil Procedure (194)
- Common Law (194)
- Law and Economics (193)
- Law and Gender (193)
- Legal Remedies (193)
- Litigation (192)
- Civil Law (191)
- Keyword
-
- Law (12)
- Seattle University Law Review (10)
- Washington (10)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
-
- Constitution (6)
- Diversity (6)
- ESG (6)
- Supreme Court (6)
- Black Law Student Association (5)
- Black Law Students (5)
- Black Laywers (5)
- First Amendment (5)
- Privacy (5)
- Seattle University (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Symposium (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Criminal Justice (4)
- Federalism (4)
- Public health (4)
- Regulation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Technology (4)
- Article III (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Corporate Law (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 241 - 241 of 241
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Judging The Judges: A Case Study In Judicial Responsibility, Maximilian J.B. Welker, Jr.
Judging The Judges: A Case Study In Judicial Responsibility, Maximilian J.B. Welker, Jr.
Seattle University Law Review
Scholarly and professional perceptions of the role of the judiciary, and hence of the responsibility of judges, have undergone radical change since the early 1900's, and judicial opinions have both reflected and been influenced by those perceptions. At the turn of the century, conceptual abstraction and logical consistency held sway. Formalism, however, gave way to Legal Realism in the 1920's and 30's. Of the many important contributions that Realism made to the way we think about law, the most fundamental was its recognition that formal rules do not mechanically govern the resolution of legal disputes. Under this conception, the dominant …