Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (448)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (222)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (128)
-
- New York Law School (113)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- Duke Law (87)
- Roger Williams University (86)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- UIC School of Law (82)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (68)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (60)
- Fordham Law School (51)
- University of Maine School of Law (48)
- University of Georgia School of Law (47)
- William & Mary Law School (47)
- BLR (46)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (43)
- American University Washington College of Law (41)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (33)
- Cornell University Law School (32)
- Washington University in St. Louis (31)
- St. Mary's University (30)
- Brooklyn Law School (28)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (27)
- Cleveland State University (26)
- Pace University (24)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (390)
- Courts (250)
- Supreme Court (236)
- Constitution (110)
- Judge (98)
-
- Judiciary (87)
- Federal courts (86)
- Court (85)
- Federal (76)
- United States Supreme Court (69)
- Jurisprudence (59)
- Constitutional law (58)
- Judicial review (56)
- Justice (56)
- Constitutional Law (55)
- Due process (54)
- New York (54)
- Law (51)
- Litigation (51)
- State (51)
- Congress (50)
- Jurisdiction (50)
- Judicial selection (47)
- Judicial process (46)
- Politics (45)
- Roger J Miner (44)
- Diversity (40)
- Court of Appeals (39)
- Defendant (39)
- Supreme court (38)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (357)
- Seattle University Law Review (214)
- Faculty Scholarship (154)
- Touro Law Review (151)
- Indiana Law Journal (140)
-
- Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (67)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Pepperdine Law Review (57)
- Michigan Law Review (56)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (53)
- Articles (49)
- Faculty Publications (48)
- Northwestern University Law Review (47)
- ExpressO (43)
- Maine Law Review (43)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Cardozo Law Review (37)
- Nevada Law Journal (34)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (32)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (32)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (31)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Fordham Law Review (28)
- Committees (27)
- Faculty Articles (25)
- Scholarly Articles (24)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (23)
- American University Law Review (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1951 - 1980 of 3135
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Comments On Who Appoints D.C. Judges, Daniel A. Rezneck
Comments On Who Appoints D.C. Judges, Daniel A. Rezneck
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Thirty-Year Retrospective. Comments Of The Honorable Gregory E. Mize (Ret.), Gregory E. Mize
A Thirty-Year Retrospective. Comments Of The Honorable Gregory E. Mize (Ret.), Gregory E. Mize
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Prologue To District Of Columbia Democracy And The Third Branch Of Government, John W. Nields, Timothy J. May
Prologue To District Of Columbia Democracy And The Third Branch Of Government, John W. Nields, Timothy J. May
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Why does the President of the United States appoint the judges of the District of Columbia's local court system? Why is the District of Columbia's local court system funded and overseen by the United States Congress? Why does the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia and not the Attorney General for the District of Columbia function as a local prosecutor, prosecuting most D.C. Code crimes in the District of Columbia's courts? The four essays which follow this introduction explore the rich history behind these unusual structural features of the District of Columbia government; they present the arguments for …
The Myth Of The Generalist Judge, Edward K. Cheng
The Myth Of The Generalist Judge, Edward K. Cheng
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Conventional judicial wisdom assumes and indeed celebrates the ideal of the generalist judge, but do judges really believe in it? This Article empirically tests this question by examining opinion assignments in the federal courts of appeals from 1995-2005. It reveals that opinion specialization is a regular part of circuit court practice, and that a significant number of judges specialize in specific subject areas. The Article then assesses the desirability of opinion specialization. Far from being a mere loophole, opinion specialization turns out to be an important development in judicial practice that promises to increase judicial expertise without incurring many of …
Reasonable Suspicion Or Real Likelihood: A Question Of Semantics? Re Shankar Alan S/O Anant Kulkarni, Lionel Leo, Siyuan Chen
Reasonable Suspicion Or Real Likelihood: A Question Of Semantics? Re Shankar Alan S/O Anant Kulkarni, Lionel Leo, Siyuan Chen
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
The law on apparent bias has been mired in some controversy following the High Court decision of Re Shankar Alan s/o Anant Kulkarni, where Sundaresh Menon J.C. seemingly departed from the tentative views of Andrew Phang J.C. (as he then was) in Tang Kin Hwa v. Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners Board on the issue of whether there were any material differences between the “reasonable suspicion of bias” test and the “real likelihood of bias” test, the two formulations of the test for apparent bias that have been variously adopted by different jurisdictions in the common law world. In Tang Kin …
"The Threes": Re-Imagining Supreme Court Decisionmaking, Chris Guthrie, Tracey E. George
"The Threes": Re-Imagining Supreme Court Decisionmaking, Chris Guthrie, Tracey E. George
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In this Essay--the first in a series of essays designed to reimagine the Supreme Court--we argue that Congress should authorize the Court to adopt, in whole or part, panel decision making... With respect to the prospect of different Court outcomes, we demonstrate empirically in this Essay that the vast majority of cases decided during the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries--including "Grutter", "Roe", and "Bush v. Gore" --would have come out the same way if the Court had decided them in panels rather than as a full Court.
Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study Of Claim Construction Reversal Rates In Patent Cases, David L. Schwartz
Practice Makes Perfect? An Empirical Study Of Claim Construction Reversal Rates In Patent Cases, David L. Schwartz
Michigan Law Review
This Article examines whether U.S. district court judges improve their skills at patent claim construction with experience, including the experience of having their own cases reviewed by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In theory, higher courts teach doctrine to lower courts via judicial decisions, and lower courts learn from these decisions. This Article tests the teaching-and-learning premise on the issue of claim construction in the realities of patent litigation. While others have shown that the Federal Circuit reverses a large percentage of lower court claim constructions, no one has analyzed whether judges with more claim construction appeal …
Solidifying Judicial Discretion Through Statutory Interpretation: The Implications Of United States V. Nelson On Criminal Sentencing, Tashama Williams
Solidifying Judicial Discretion Through Statutory Interpretation: The Implications Of United States V. Nelson On Criminal Sentencing, Tashama Williams
North Carolina Central Law Review
No abstract provided.
Only Skin Deep?: The Cost Of Partisan Politics On Minority Diversity Of The Federal Bench, Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas
Only Skin Deep?: The Cost Of Partisan Politics On Minority Diversity Of The Federal Bench, Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas
Indiana Law Journal
Symposium: Latinos and Latinas at the Epicenter of Contemporary Legal Discourses. Indiana University School of Law-Bloomington, March 2007.
Limiting The Federal Pardon Power, Kristen H. Fowler
Limiting The Federal Pardon Power, Kristen H. Fowler
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Common Law Court Of The United States, Jack M. Beermann
The Supreme Common Law Court Of The United States, Jack M. Beermann
Faculty Scholarship
The U.S. Supreme Court's primary role in the history of the United States, especially in constitutional cases (and cases hovering in the universe of the Constitution), has been to limit Congress's ability to redefine and redistribute rights in a direction most people would characterize as liberal. In other words, the Supreme Court, for most of the history of the United States since the adoption of the Constitution, has been a conservative force against change and redistribution. The Court has used five distinct devices to advance its control over the law. First, it has construed rights-creating constitutional provisions narrowly when those …
Extra-Legal Characteristics And Sentencing Disparity Among Federal Drug Offenders, Justin D. Galasso
Extra-Legal Characteristics And Sentencing Disparity Among Federal Drug Offenders, Justin D. Galasso
Sociology & Criminal Justice Theses & Dissertations
The development of the federal sentencing guidelines was made as an attempt to provide a uniform standard of sentencing procedure for defendants convicted within the federal legal system. Unfortunately, such unvarying policy has over the years birthed a system of sentencing that lacks equality among like defendants. The Supreme Court, in 2005, ruled that the sentencing guidelines were no longer to be compulsory during sentencing procedures, but rather act as an ancillary tool. The present study examines multiple legal and extra-legal variables and their influence on two aspects of imprisonment probability for federal drug offenders for the years of 1999-2006: …
Book Review Of The Nine: Inside The Secret World Of The Supreme Court, Eric J. Segall
Book Review Of The Nine: Inside The Secret World Of The Supreme Court, Eric J. Segall
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
Judicial Selection: It's More About The Choices Than Who Does The Choosing, Honorable Lavenski R. Smith
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Amendment 80 Judicial Politics In Arkansas: Have The Changes Undermined The Argument For Selection By Appointment?, Jay Barth
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
Family Law & Civil Procedure - Daddy Dilemma: Should The Truth Matter? Martin V. Pierce, No. 06-950, 2007 Wl 1447911 (Ark. May 17, 2007), Katie S. Allen
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law - The Supreme Court Expands The Witt Principles To Exclude A Juror Who Would Follow The Law. Uttecht V. Brown, 127 S. Ct. 2218 (2007)., Brooke A. Thompson
Criminal Law - The Supreme Court Expands The Witt Principles To Exclude A Juror Who Would Follow The Law. Uttecht V. Brown, 127 S. Ct. 2218 (2007)., Brooke A. Thompson
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
[Tru/Fals]Isms: A Statistical Analysis Of Several Arkansas Judicial Election Bromides, Honorable Timothy Davis Fox
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray
The Style Of A Skeptic: The Opinions Of Chief Justice Roberts, Laura Krugman Ray
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Letter From Lifers Committee, Roger J. Miner '56
Gender, Race, And Intersectionality On The Federal Appellate Bench., Todd Collins, Laura Moyer
Gender, Race, And Intersectionality On The Federal Appellate Bench., Todd Collins, Laura Moyer
Faculty and Staff Scholarship
While theoretical justifications predict that a judge’s gender and race may influence judicial decisions, empirical support for these arguments has been mixed. However, recent increases in judicial diversity necessitate a reexamination of these earlier studies. Rather than examining individual judges on a single characteristic, such as gender or race alone, this research note argues that the intersection of individual characteristics may provide an alternative approach for evaluating the effects of diversity on the federal appellate bench. The results of cohort models examining the joint effects of race and gender suggest that minority female judges are more likely to support criminal …
A Rodent In Robes, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
A Rodent In Robes, Donald E. Wilkes Jr.
Popular Media
Because of the credible (but ultimately unresolved) sexual harassment charges leveled against him by Anita Hill and others at his confirmation hearings, as well as his creepy-crawly anti-individual rights voting record on the Supreme Court, nearly every time U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas visits a university campus there are protests by faculty and students, and now Michael Adams' decision to invite Thomas to be the commencement speaker at the upcoming UGA graduation ceremony has created a furor. For years, UGA administrators appear to have tolerated sexual harassment on campus, and in recent months there have been startling revelations of …
Brennan V. Scalia, Justice Or Jurisprudence? A Moderate Proposal, Travis A. Knobbe
Brennan V. Scalia, Justice Or Jurisprudence? A Moderate Proposal, Travis A. Knobbe
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Verdict On Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Neil Vidmar
The Verdict On Juries, Valerie P. Hans, Neil Vidmar
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
In reviewing debates and research evidence about jury trials for our book, American Juries: The Verdict (Prometheus Books, 2007), we have had the chance to reflect on the status of the jury system in the United States. High profile jury trials put the spotlight on the American practice of using its citizens as decision makers. When jury verdicts are at odds with public opinion, criticisms of the institution are common. The civil jury has been a lightning rod for those who want tort reform. This article draws together some of our reflections about the health of the jury system …