Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (447)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (222)
- Seattle University School of Law (218)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (153)
- University of Michigan Law School (128)
-
- New York Law School (113)
- Pepperdine University (92)
- Duke Law (87)
- Roger Williams University (86)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (83)
- UIC School of Law (82)
- University of Colorado Law School (80)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (68)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (60)
- Fordham Law School (51)
- University of Maine School of Law (48)
- University of Georgia School of Law (47)
- William & Mary Law School (47)
- BLR (46)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (43)
- American University Washington College of Law (41)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (33)
- Cornell University Law School (32)
- Washington University in St. Louis (31)
- St. Mary's University (30)
- Brooklyn Law School (28)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (27)
- Cleveland State University (26)
- Pace University (24)
- Keyword
-
- Judges (391)
- Courts (251)
- Supreme Court (236)
- Constitution (110)
- Judge (98)
-
- Judiciary (87)
- Federal courts (86)
- Court (85)
- Federal (76)
- United States Supreme Court (69)
- Jurisprudence (59)
- Constitutional law (58)
- Constitutional Law (56)
- Judicial review (56)
- Justice (56)
- Due process (54)
- New York (54)
- Law (51)
- Litigation (51)
- State (51)
- Congress (50)
- Jurisdiction (50)
- Judicial selection (47)
- Judicial process (46)
- Politics (45)
- Roger J Miner (44)
- Diversity (40)
- Court of Appeals (39)
- Defendant (39)
- Supreme court (38)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- University of Richmond Law Review (356)
- Seattle University Law Review (214)
- Faculty Scholarship (154)
- Touro Law Review (151)
- Indiana Law Journal (140)
-
- Law Faculty Publications (79)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (67)
- UIC Law Review (59)
- Pepperdine Law Review (57)
- Michigan Law Review (56)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (53)
- Articles (49)
- Faculty Publications (48)
- Northwestern University Law Review (47)
- ExpressO (43)
- Maine Law Review (43)
- Scholarly Works (41)
- Cardozo Law Review (37)
- Nevada Law Journal (34)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (32)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (32)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (31)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (28)
- Fordham Law Review (28)
- Committees (27)
- Faculty Articles (25)
- Scholarly Articles (24)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (23)
- American University Law Review (22)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1441 - 1470 of 3132
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Practice And Precedent In Historical Gloss Games, Joseph Blocher, Margaret H. Lemos
Practice And Precedent In Historical Gloss Games, Joseph Blocher, Margaret H. Lemos
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Backlash Against International Courts In West, East And Southern Africa: Causes And Consequences, Karen J. Alter, James T. Gathii, Laurence R. Helfer
Backlash Against International Courts In West, East And Southern Africa: Causes And Consequences, Karen J. Alter, James T. Gathii, Laurence R. Helfer
Faculty Scholarship
This paper discusses three credible attempts by African governments to restrict the jurisdiction of three similarly-situated sub-regional courts in response to politically controversial rulings. In West Africa, when the ECOWAS Court upheld allegations of torture by opposition journalists in the Gambia, that country’s political leaders sought to restrict the Court’s power to review human rights complaints. The other member states ultimately defeated the Gambia’s proposal. In East Africa, Kenya failed in its efforts to eliminate the EACJ and to remove some of its judges after a decision challenging an election to a sub-regional legislature. However, the member states agreed to …
Inherent National Sovereignty Constitutionalism: An Original Understanding Of The U.S. Constitution, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Inherent National Sovereignty Constitutionalism: An Original Understanding Of The U.S. Constitution, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Diversifying State Judiciary, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Diversifying State Judiciary, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Extralegal Supreme Court Policy-Making, Joëlle Anne Moreno
Extralegal Supreme Court Policy-Making, Joëlle Anne Moreno
William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal
The Colbert Report aired its final episode on December 18, 2014.1 Nine years earlier, on the first episode, Stephen Colbert coined the word “truthiness.” Truthiness satirized contemporary disinterest in empirical information in a country increasingly “divided between those who think with their head and those who know with their heart.” Truthiness was not just the Merriam-Webster word of the year. Over the past decade, it has been the unspoken mantra of reporters who give equal time to climate science denialists, faith healers, and vaccine refusers. When Justices of the Supreme Court decide questions of scientific or empirical fact—such as whether …
Filling The D.C. Circuit Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Filling The D.C. Circuit Vacancies, Carl W. Tobias
Indiana Law Journal
Partisanship undermines judicial nominations to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. With three of eleven judgeships vacant during Barack Obama’s first term, he was the only President in a half century not to appoint a jurist to the nation’s second-most important court. Confirming accomplished nominees, thus, became imperative for the circuit’s prompt, economical, and fair case disposition. In 2013, Obama submitted excellent candidates. Patricia Millett had argued thirty-two Supreme Court appeals; Cornelia Pillard successfully litigated numerous path-breaking matters; and Robert Wilkins had served on the D.C. District bench for three years. The purportedly shrinking tribunal …
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Judge Investigation, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Yelnosky On Judge Investigation, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Praise Defenders, Not Just Prosecutors, Stephen Henderson
Praise Defenders, Not Just Prosecutors, Stephen Henderson
Other Faculty Publications
In this letter to the editor, I discuss the problems when a district court judge becomes a graduate and class spokesperson for a Citizens' Police Academy.See article here.See letter here.
A Look Back: Developing Indiana Law; Post-Bench Reflections Of An Indiana Supreme Court Justice; Selected Developments In Indiana Administrative Law (1989-2012), Frank Sullivan Jr.
A Look Back: Developing Indiana Law; Post-Bench Reflections Of An Indiana Supreme Court Justice; Selected Developments In Indiana Administrative Law (1989-2012), Frank Sullivan Jr.
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Striving For Efficiency In Administrative Litigation: North Carolina's Office Of Administrative Hearings, Julian Mann Iii
Striving For Efficiency In Administrative Litigation: North Carolina's Office Of Administrative Hearings, Julian Mann Iii
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Semi-Retirement Of Senior Supreme Court Justices: Examining Their Service On The Courts Of Appeals, Jon A. Gryskiewicz
The Semi-Retirement Of Senior Supreme Court Justices: Examining Their Service On The Courts Of Appeals, Jon A. Gryskiewicz
Seton Hall Circuit Review
No abstract provided.
Trending @ Rwulaw: Judge William E. Smith's Post: Rwu Law & The Federal Courts: A Unique Partnership, William E. Smith
Trending @ Rwulaw: Judge William E. Smith's Post: Rwu Law & The Federal Courts: A Unique Partnership, William E. Smith
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Trailblazers And Those That Followed : Personal Experiences, Gender, And Judicial Empathy., Laura P. Moyer, Susan B. Haire
Trailblazers And Those That Followed : Personal Experiences, Gender, And Judicial Empathy., Laura P. Moyer, Susan B. Haire
Faculty and Staff Scholarship
This paper investigates one causal mechanism that may explain why female judges on the federal appellate courts are more likely than men to side with plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases. To test whether personal experiences with inequality are related to empathetic responses to the claims of female plaintiffs, we focus on the first wave of female judges, who attended law school during a time of severe gender inequality. We find that female judges are more likely than their male colleagues to support plaintiffs in sex discrimination cases, but that this difference is seen only in judges who graduated law school …
Voir Dire: Strategy And Tactics In The Defense Of Social And Political Activists, Murray R. Bowes
Voir Dire: Strategy And Tactics In The Defense Of Social And Political Activists, Murray R. Bowes
Akron Law Review
With the courts increasingly being the forum for legal disputes between those who demand change in the superstructure and those who represent (or are) the structure, a rather unfortunate by-product has evolved: a feeling that the courts can no longer adequately dispense justice.8 This manifests itself in beliefs that if one is prosecuted for activities that were designed to advance social change, either in violation of the law or not, that the individual will not be afforded a fair trial; 9 a reflection that the social or political activist will not be judged by an impartial jury….For the purposes of …
Strategic Behavior And Variation In The Supreme Court’S Caseload Over Time, Kenneth W. Moffett, Forrest Maltzman, Karen Miranda, Charles R. Shipan
Strategic Behavior And Variation In The Supreme Court’S Caseload Over Time, Kenneth W. Moffett, Forrest Maltzman, Karen Miranda, Charles R. Shipan
SIUE Faculty Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activity
Over the past sixty years, the size of the Supreme Court’s docket has varied tremendously, growing at some points in time and shrinking at others. What accounts for this variation in the size of the docket? We focus on two key strategic factors – the predictability of outcomes within the Court, and whether justices consider the potential actions of other political institutions – and assess whether these factors help to explain the variation in docket size over time. We discover that uncertainty and institutional constraints prevent the Court from choosing cases with complete freedom, even after accounting for other potential …
Clouds In The Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations And The Unpredictable Behavior Of Supreme Court Appointees, Christopher E. Smith, Kimberly A. Beuger
Clouds In The Crystal Ball: Presidential Expectations And The Unpredictable Behavior Of Supreme Court Appointees, Christopher E. Smith, Kimberly A. Beuger
Akron Law Review
This article will analyze the pitfalls that presidents face in hoping that their nominees' judicial performance will comport with presidential expectations.
Veteran Treatment Courts, Honorable Robert T. Russell
Veteran Treatment Courts, Honorable Robert T. Russell
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sexually Exploited Youth: A View From The Bench, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Sexually Exploited Youth: A View From The Bench, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mental Health Courts: Bridging Two Worlds, Honorable Matthew J. D’Emic
Mental Health Courts: Bridging Two Worlds, Honorable Matthew J. D’Emic
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Adjudicating Cases Involving Adolescents In Suffolk County Criminal Courts, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Adjudicating Cases Involving Adolescents In Suffolk County Criminal Courts, Honorable Fernando Camacho
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Foreword, Honorable Judith S. Kaye
Foreword, Honorable Sol Wachtler
Newsroom: Logan On Justice Scalia's Vitriol, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Logan On Justice Scalia's Vitriol, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Judge James R. Browning: His Legacy For Montana And The Future Of The Federal Judiciary, The Honorable Sidney R. Thomas
Judge James R. Browning: His Legacy For Montana And The Future Of The Federal Judiciary, The Honorable Sidney R. Thomas
Montana Law Review
No abstract provided.
Trending@Rwu Law: Professor David Logan's Post: Diversity In The Rhode Island Judiciary, David A. Logan
Trending@Rwu Law: Professor David Logan's Post: Diversity In The Rhode Island Judiciary, David A. Logan
Law School Blogs
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Horwitz On Closed Courtroom Debate, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Horwitz On Closed Courtroom Debate, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Newsroom: Logan On Judicial Diversity, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Newsroom: Logan On Judicial Diversity, Roger Williams University School Of Law
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
#Snitches Get Stitches: Witness Intimidation In The Age Of Facebook And Twitter, John Browning
#Snitches Get Stitches: Witness Intimidation In The Age Of Facebook And Twitter, John Browning
Pace Law Review
In order to better understand witness intimidation in the age of social media, one must examine both the forms it has taken as well as the response by law enforcement and the criminal justice system. As this article points out, the digital age has brought with it a host of new ways in which witnesses may be subjected to online harassment and intimidation across multiple platforms, and those means have been used to target not only victims and fact witnesses but even prosecutors and expert witnesses as well. The article will also examine potential responses to the problem of witness …
Supreme Court Institute Annual Report, 2014-2015, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
Supreme Court Institute Annual Report, 2014-2015, Georgetown University Law Center, Supreme Court Institute
SCI Papers & Reports
During the 2014-2015 academic year-–corresponding to the U.S. Supreme Court’s October Term (OT) 2014-–the Supreme Court Institute (SCI) provided moot courts for advocates in 100% of the cases heard by the Supreme Court, offered a variety of programs related to the Supreme Court, and continued to integrate the moot court program into the education of Georgetown Law students. A list of all SCI moot courts held in OT 2014-–arranged by argument sitting and date of moot and including the name and affiliation of each advocate and the number of observers-–follows the narrative portion of this report.