Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (210)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (74)
- University of Michigan Law School (70)
- University of Colorado Law School (68)
-
- UIC School of Law (56)
- Georgetown University Law Center (47)
- University of Richmond (40)
- Pepperdine University (39)
- Duke Law (33)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (32)
- Roger Williams University (32)
- BLR (31)
- Fordham Law School (29)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (29)
- William & Mary Law School (25)
- University of Georgia School of Law (23)
- Cornell University Law School (22)
- New York Law School (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (21)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (17)
- Notre Dame Law School (17)
- Cleveland State University (16)
- Columbia Law School (14)
- University of the Pacific (14)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (13)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (12)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (12)
- Keyword
-
- Supreme Court (176)
- Judges (154)
- Constitution (149)
- Constitutional law (117)
- Constitutional Law (114)
-
- Judicial review (81)
- Courts (77)
- Federal (62)
- Jurisprudence (60)
- Judge (49)
- State (48)
- United States Supreme Court (48)
- Due process (46)
- New York (44)
- Constitutional interpretation (41)
- Court (40)
- Federalism (40)
- First Amendment (40)
- Congress (38)
- Law (38)
- Separation of powers (38)
- Judiciary (34)
- Originalism (34)
- Fourteenth Amendment (31)
- Court of Appeals (30)
- Defendant (30)
- Politics (30)
- Supreme court (30)
- Legislation (29)
- Constitutional (27)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (208)
- Touro Law Review (134)
- Faculty Scholarship (77)
- UIC Law Review (52)
- Michigan Law Review (51)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (44)
- Cardozo Law Review (43)
- Publications (38)
- University of Richmond Law Review (34)
- Articles (31)
- ExpressO (29)
- Northwestern University Law Review (26)
- Faculty Publications (23)
- Pepperdine Law Review (23)
- Water as a Public Resource: Emerging Rights and Obligations (Summer Conference, June 1-3) (21)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (20)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (17)
- Scholarly Works (17)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (16)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (16)
- Fordham Law Review (15)
- Indiana Law Journal (14)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (13)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (13)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (12)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (11)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (11)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (10)
- McGeorge Law Review (10)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 1498
Full-Text Articles in Judges
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Abrams V. United States: Remembering The Authors Of Both Opinions, James F. Fagan Jr.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
Freedom Of Speech And The Press
The Jurisdiction To Do Justice: Florida's Jury Override And The State Constitution, Michael Mello
The Jurisdiction To Do Justice: Florida's Jury Override And The State Constitution, Michael Mello
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
My Pizza With Ninó, Alex Kozinski
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Tradition, Precedent, And Justice Scalia, David A. Strauss
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Scalia And The Commerce Clause: Reflections Of A State Tax Lawyer, Walter Hellerstein
Justice Scalia And The Commerce Clause: Reflections Of A State Tax Lawyer, Walter Hellerstein
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Judging In The Good Society: A Comment On The Jurisprudence Of Justice Scalia, Stephen Wizner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Fourth, Fifth, And Sixth Amendments, William E. Hellerstein
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Justice Brennan And The First Amendment Minefield: In Respectful Appreciation, Ralph Michael Stein
Justice Brennan And The First Amendment Minefield: In Respectful Appreciation, Ralph Michael Stein
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
It is a special privilege, and a personal joy, for me to have the opportunity to contribute a piece honoring such a revered figure. I make no claim to scholarly objectivity. My premise is simple: William J. Brennan has given us a legacy of first amendment decisions, concurrences, and dissents that reflect great honor on the jurist. My portion of this Festschrift provides selected examples of Justice Brennan's contribution, and concludes by thanking him for serving, through his opinions, as a mentor for me throughout my career as a teacher of constitutional law.
Federal Habeas Review Of New York Convictions: Relieving The Tensions, Roger J. Miner '56
Federal Habeas Review Of New York Convictions: Relieving The Tensions, Roger J. Miner '56
Bar Associations
No abstract provided.
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Dichotomy In Constitutional Analysis, Roger J. Miner '56
Justice Harlan And The Bill Of Rights: A Dichotomy In Constitutional Analysis, Roger J. Miner '56
Endowed/named Lectures and Keynote Addresses
No abstract provided.
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Impeachment Exception To The Exclusionary Rules: Policies, Principles, And Politics, The , James L. Kainen
Faculty Scholarship
The exclusionary evidence rules derived from the Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments continue to play an important role in constitutional criminal procedure, despite the intense controversy that surrounds them. The primary justification for these rules has shifted from an "imperative of judicial integrity" to the "deterrence of police conduct that violates... [constitutional] rights." Regardless of the justification it uses for the rules' existence, the Supreme Court continues to limit their breadth "at the margin," when "the acknowledged costs to other values vital to a rational system of criminal justice" outweigh the deterrent effects of exclusion. The most notable limitation on …
Right-To-Die, Bruce Morton
Jurisdiction Of The County Court
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
"I Vote This Way Because I'M Wrong": The Supreme Court Justice As Epimenides, John M. Rogers
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
Possibly the most unsettling phenomenon in the Supreme Court's 1988 term was Justice White's decision to vote contrary to his own exhaustively stated reasoning in Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. His unexplained decision to vote against the result of his own analysis lends support to those who argue that law, or at least constitutional law, is fundamentally indeterminate. Proponents of the indeterminacy argument sometimes base their position on the allegedly inescapable inconsistency of decisions made by a multi-member court. There is an answer to the inconsistency argument, but it founders if justices sometimes vote, without explanation, on the basis of …
The Role Of Legal Scholars In The Confirmation Hearings For Supreme Court Nominees—Some Reflections, Thomas B. Mcaffee
The Role Of Legal Scholars In The Confirmation Hearings For Supreme Court Nominees—Some Reflections, Thomas B. Mcaffee
Scholarly Works
Until recently legal scholars have traditionally not been much involved in the process of confirming Justices. As the legal and political ideology of prospective Justices have come to play an important role in the process of nomination and confirmation, however, it is perhaps inevitable that legal scholars would also become more involved. At least since the nomination of Judge Bork, legal scholars have contributed in unprecedented numbers both to the Senate's deliberation process and to the public debate over the fitness of the nominees to the Court. The Bork hearings themselves were, of course, the watershed, and they remain, for …