Internet Law Commons^™

Terminating The Termination Policy Requirement: Protecting Internet Users And Service Providers By Expanding The Dmca Section 512(A) Safe Harbor, Michael Kritzer

Cardozo Law Review

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) established “safe harbors” for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) against secondary liability for the copyright infringement perpetrated by their users. Among the requirements for eligibility for these safe harbors is a provision requiring ISPs to implement a policy for terminating repeat infringers. This Note proposes that Congress codify an exception to this termination requirement for a specific class of ISPs—“transitory” providers that solely provide internet access and do not control the information transmitted over their networks.

This Note examines the safe harbor and termination requirement through the lens of two recent secondary infringement …

Transformative Technology Or Blatant Theft: Reassessing Fair Use In The Era Of Generative Ai, Tsai-Lin Hsieh, Tsai-Fang Chen

Cardozo Law Review

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) applications in recent years has sparked a global “AI frenzy.” Yet, the rise of new AI technologies has also raised concerns about copyright infringement, particularly regarding whether generative AI developers should be held liable for using copyrighted works as training inputs and generating outputs that compete with original works. In response, AI developers have invoked a long line of technological fair use precedents to defend against any potential copyright infringement claims. The purpose of this Article is to offer insights into whether generative AI is a transformative technology that deserves fair use …

When The Internet Attacks, Craig Cowie

Cardozo Law Review

Courts have struggled with applying personal jurisdiction in cases involving intentional torts where the defendants act outside the forum, and the problem is particularly apparent and acute when the defendants use the internet to commit the tort. For example, is there jurisdiction when a defendant doxxes someone and calls for violence? What if they leave a bad Yelp review? Or tweet a defamatory statement? Courts have used many tests for determining whether personal jurisdiction is appropriate in these situations, but there has been relatively little recent scholarship on whether these tests are appropriate for analyzing personal jurisdiction in these contexts. …

Swiping Rights: Hidden Costs Of Hidden Laws, Rachel Landy

Articles

While many legal regimes have undergone fundamental shifts to account for the online economy, one lags behind: industry-specific mandatory contract rules. These rules, frequently buried in decades-old, nonintuitive statutes, are often overly prescriptive and come with draconian penalties, hampering the goals of entrepreneurship and impeding startup growth.

Much has been written about the intersection of regulation and entrepreneurship. But sparse attention has been paid to the unintended consequences on early-stage companies of more subtle regulatory interventions like contract rules — especially those with inconsistent or conflicting requirements among the states. This Article begins to fill that gap and uses as …

Digital Danger For People With Visual Disabilities: Online Adhesion Contracts And The Lack Of Web Accessibility Standards, Narmina Aliyev

Cardozo Law Review

Since Title III of the American with Disabilities Act was enacted, the landscape of where people with disabilities may experience discrimination has grown even larger. With the digital world expanding rapidly, people with visual disabilities face unique dangers presented by inaccessible websites and the lack of federal web accessibility standards. While courts across the nation scatter to find balance in protecting the rights of people with disabilities without overburdening businesses, Congress’s failure to legislate web accessibility standards, and the Department of Justice’s ineffective enforcement mechanisms propel misunderstanding and confusion among those affected by this legal gap. Specifically, the growing presence …

Shoot The Messenger: Why Section 230 Does Not Shield Suggestive Content Delivery, Alexander Heinkele

Cardozo Law Review de•novo

Internet companies have frequently relied on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 to avoid liability for third-party content hosted on their platforms. However, over time, companies began to take advantage of the broad cover of Section 230 in circumstances outside the statute’s original scope. This Note advocates for a more nuanced interpretation of the statute as it applies to suggestive algorithms and offers a proposal for amending Section 230 to better reflect the modern digital landscape.

Are Holocaust Denial Laws And Critical Race Theory Bans The Same?, Rob Kahn

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Florida's education rules list Holocaust denial and critical race theory ("CRT") as "theories that distort the past." This is not a fair comparison. Holocaust denial laws and CRT bans are analytically distinguishable. Holocaust denial laws were originally intended to fight hate, and this is the only reason they might be legitimate today. By contrast, CRT bans, for all their well-meaning language aboutprotecting childrenfrom race-based accusations of guilt, intend to silence the past. Indeed, the CRT bans are uncannily similar to the laws used in Turkey to ban discussion of the Armenian Genocide in schools. While one might reject both sets …

Artificial Intelligence And The Future Of Law, Cardozo Startup Society, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Law And Data Science Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Blockchain, The Superhero That The Healthcare Industry Needs, Victor Wang

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that blockchain technology holds significant potential for transforming the healthcare industry by enhancing data security and efficiency. However, its integration faces legal challenges due to conflicts with existing healthcare laws, particularly the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the HITECH Act. The note contends that blockchain's decentralized and immutable nature violates key HIPAA requirements, such as data disposal and accountability standards. It advocates for updating these laws to accommodate blockchain technology and ensure compliance, emphasizing the need for legal frameworks to evolve alongside technological advancements.

The Debate Surrounding The Company Purpose In The Post-Pandemic Age, Leon Anidjar

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The recent COVID-19 pandemic crisis produced many creative responses to confront its adverse results. Many companies worldwide were required to adopt innovative thinking by altering their business activities and revising their entire supply chain by attracting different types of resources delivered by various stakeholders. This Article explores the implications of this fundamental change on central theoretical assumptions of corporate governance. It articulates a new stakeholders-resources theory that explores governance norms as part of the firm's quest for inputs required to generate a competitive advantage. It applies this analytical framework in the debate on corporate purpose. This Article argues that companies …

The Law And Finance Of Infrastructure Investment, Daisuke Asaoka

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Institutional design facilitates the investment of private capital in infrastructure. The Article deals with concessions, which have been a major format for infrastructure privatization in Japan since their legislation in 2011. It argues that the Japanese government, faced with mounting public debt, walks a thin line between attracting private capital and securing public interest in infrastructure under private operation. By comparing concessions with stock sales, the mainstream form of privatization until the legislation, the Article shows that while concessions have advantages in terms of economics and public interest control, they may hinder the strategic growth of private enterprises by limiting …

Remedying Online Shaming, Miriam Marcowitz-Bitton, Hillel Sommer

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Shaming is an act of subjecting someone publicly to shame, disgrace, humiliation, or disrepute.1 This act has challenged many existing legal regimes. Its effects are devastating, and efforts to cope with it within the current legal framework have been largely unsuccessful, mainly due to the challenges posed by anonymous, online shaming. This article rethinks the remedies currently available to handle shaming. It touches upon both civil and criminal remedies and penalties, considering the role that the right to be forgotten can play in handling shaming effectively. The article argues that only by complementing existing remedies with victims' rights can we …

Crying Cda Immunity: Tech Companies' Knee-Jerk Defense To Child Sexual Exploitation & Product Liability Claims, Carrie Goldberg, Naomi Leeds

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act is being misapplied by tech companies like Omegle to avoid liability in cases involving child sexual exploitation and product liability. It contends that Section 230 immunity should not shield companies when claims pertain to product design flaws and trafficking, emphasizing the need for courts to recognize the distinction between content moderation and product-related harms.

Panel 1: Sexual Exploitation, Sex Workers, And Section 230, Mary Graw Leary, Kendra Albert, Carrie Goldberg, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the implications of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, focusing on its impact on sexual exploitation, sex workers, and online speech. Panelists discuss the unintended consequences of legislative changes like FOSTA-SESTA and propose reforms such as the EARN IT Act to address child sexual abuse material (CSAM). They emphasize the need to balance protecting victims with safeguarding legitimate speech, particularly for marginalized communities, and advocate for comprehensive reforms rather than piecemeal changes.

Intragovernmental Speech And Sanction, Katherine A. Shaw

Articles

This Essay, prepared as part of a symposium on Professor Helen Norton’s The Government’s Speech and the Constitution, asks what role, if any, we should understand the Constitution to play in mediating disputes over speech between and among government entities. Focusing on the examples of impeachment and censure, the piece considers scenarios in which one arm of government takes action in response to the speech of another arm or entity of government, exploring what role the Constitution should play in shaping or constraining those responses.

Adalah Legal Center For Arab Minority Rights In Israel V. State Attorney’S Office – Cyber Department, Hanan Melcer, Esther Hayut, Alex Stein

Translated Opinions

The petition addressed the question of the authority to conduct “voluntary enforcement” activity for the removal of harmful content from the internet, the manner and configuration of the activity of the Cyber Department of the State Attorney’s Office, and the lack of express statutory authority for the activity.

Background: In accordance with the Work Procedure established by the State Attorney’s Office, the Cyber Department initiates referrals to online platform operators, content providers, and other internet platforms (like Facebook and Google), reporting publications that the State Attorney’s Office deems as constituting an offense under Israeli criminal law, and that also …

Amazon Hq2 & The Nimby Movement: An Opportunity To Incorporate Deliberative Democracy Into New York's Land Use System, Jennifer Russnow

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note examines the failure of Amazon's HQ2 deal in Long Island City, attributing it to inadequate community engagement and the top-down approach by government officials. It argues that incorporating deliberative democratic methods into New York's land use system could mitigate such issues by fostering better dialogue between stakeholders, thus leading to more inclusive and equitable development projects.

The State Of Juvenile Diversion In Kosovo, Jason R. Tashea

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

Through original, in-country interviews and research, this Article will introduce Kosovo's current juvenile diversion system and the need for its continued improvement. Kosovo-Europe 's youngest country-has instituted juvenile diversion, mediation, and educational alternatives to the traditional criminal justice system. This is positive progress, since research shows that children are developmentally more susceptible to reform and reeducation than adults. Thus, rehabilitating a child instead ofpunishing him lessens the chance the child will recommit a crime. However, there is evidence-informed by interviews with national and local stakeholders-that there is still room for procedural and statutory changes to expand the adoption, use, and …

The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly Behavior, Michal Lavi

Cardozo Law Review

Shaming is usually referred to as the publication of perceived anti-social or illegal behavior of an individual in order to condemn or humiliate him. It has some virtues: it makes it harder for people to get away with wrongful behavior, and it promotes justice. It also promotes freedom of expression and enables efficient deterrence. By spreading information on the behavior of individuals, shaming encourages one to maintain his reputation and facilitates beneficial transactions. Finally, it helps the public to avoid inefficient services.

Yet shaming raises many problems. Anyone can shame another based on individual, as opposed to universal, values, thus …

Rethinking Social Media: An Expert Panel Discussion, Howard M. Squadron Program In Law, Media And Society, Bonavero Institute Of Human Rights, Cardozo Law Moot Court Honor Society

2018–2019 Flyers

This expert panel discussion, moderated by Professor Monroe Price, explored the evolving challenges and regulatory efforts related to social media. Held on Thursday, January 31st, from 6–8pm in the Moot Court Room at Cardozo School of Law, the event addressed pressing issues such as child pornography, cyberstalking, hate speech, terrorist content, and the impact of social media on U.S. elections. Panelists included Robyn Caplan (Data and Society), Jessa Lingel (University of Pennsylvania), and Cardozo Professor Felix Wu, whose work focuses on freedom of expression and cybersecurity. Presented by the Howard M. Squadron Program in Law, Media and Society in partnership …

A Brief Introduction To Digital Art & Blockchain, Jessica Bookout, Lauren Cimbol, Shannon Leigh Collins, Devin L. Newman

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

To Filter Or Not To Filter? That Is The Question In Eu Copyright Reform, Giancarlo Frosio

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

This article discusses the proposed introduction in EU law of an obligation for hosting providers to conclude licencing agreements with copyright holders and ensure they are taking effective technological measures, such as Content ID technologies, to prevent copyright infringement on online platforms. This proposal is included in Article 13 and accompanying Recitals of the European Commission's Draft Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market of September 14, 2016, which forms an important part of the ongoing EU copyright reform. This article highlights the shortcomings of this proposed reform, which may fall short in terms of clarity, consistency with the …

Progress Or Profit: Reconsidering The Shortened Statutory Period Scheme, Max Stul Oppenheimer

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

(Re)Defining Race: Addressing The Consequences Of The Law's Failure To Define Race, Destiny Peery

Cardozo Law Review

Modern lawmakers and courts have consistently avoided discussing how to define race for legal purposes even in areas of law tasked regularly with making decisions that require them. This failure to define what race is in legal contexts specifically requiring such determinations, and in the law more broadly, creates problems for multiple actors in the legal system, from plaintiffs deciding whether to pursue claims of discrimination, lawyers deciding how to argue cases, and legal decision-makers deciding cases where race is not only relevant but often central to the legal question at hand. This Article considers the hesitance to engage with …

Piecemeal State Legislation: The Wrong Way To Divide The Internet Poker Pie?, Peter T. Busch

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The Myth Of Obsolete Obscenity, Jennifer M. Kinsley

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Give Me Internet Or Give Me Death: Analyzing The Constitutionality Of Internet Restrictions As A Condition Of Supervised Release For Child Pornography Offenders, Laura Tatelman

Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice

The note argues that blanket bans on internet and internet-capable devices as a condition of supervised release for child pornography offenders are unconstitutional under the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. These bans infringe on fundamental liberties such as speech, association, and access to information, disproportionately affecting offenders’ ability to reintegrate into society. The analysis advocates for a balanced approach that prioritizes public safety while respecting constitutional rights, suggesting alternatives like supervised release rather than outright internet prohibition.

Trademark Protection In The New Internet Age: Template For Successful Legal Rights Objections In The Gtld Revolution, Kate Dolinska

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

The "Dot" Times They Are A-Changin': How New Generic Top Level Domains (Gtlds) Will Change Consumer Perception About The Internet, Eric J. Shimanoff

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Acum V. Emi, Daphne Barak-Erez, Zvi Zylbertal, Elyakim Rubinstein

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

In 2004 the Director-General of the Antitrust Authority determined that the activity of ACUM (a corporation that operates to manage its members’ copyrights in musical works in Israel) constitutes a monopoly on managing copyright over musical works. In 2011 the Antitrust Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) approved the activity of ACUM as a cartel, subject to a series of requirements (“the permanent requirements”), which would be …