International Law Commons^™

Rising Sea Levels And Rising State Interest: How The Arctic Council Should Respond To The Realities Of Climate Change And The Resulting Rise In State Interest In A Navigable Arctic, Jack Kirkpatrick

Emory International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Promoting And Reforming Kenya’S Customary Justice Systems In Criminal Cases, Daniel S. Mcconkie Jr.

Emory International Law Review

Kenya’s indigenous customary justice systems developed over time to administer African justice rooted in local community harmony. British Colonialists imposed a foreign legal system, and Kenya formally retained that system even after gaining independence in 1963. Nevertheless, ordinary Kenyans today continue to resort to customary justice systems for their legal problems, including many crimes. The 2010 Constitution requires the judiciary to promote customary justice systems because they are trustworthy and accessible. Paradoxically, though, the Constitution also forbids these customary justice systems from contravening other constitutional provisions. Therein lies the difficulty. Customary justice systems’ procedures do not always comport with …

Introduction To The Special Issue Of The Emory International Law Review, Magdalena Tulibacka

Emory International Law Review

No abstract provided.

Thunder Road: The Implementation Of The Representative Actions Directive In Europe, Alexandre Biard-Denieul

Emory International Law Review

In December 2020, the European Union adopted breakthrough legislation setting out new rules for collective redress—better known as “representative actions”—in Europe. EU Directive 2020/1828 gives representative entities the possibility to seek injunctive and/or compensatory measures on behalf of groups of consumers affected by mass harm situations. The EU Member States had until December 25, 2022 to transpose the European rules into their national legal systems. The transposition phase was expected to be key as the Directive gives significant leeway to the Member States to decide on several important procedural aspects likely to influence the overall functioning and effectiveness of representative …

The Quest For Funding Under The Dutch Wamca: Third Party Funding And The Viability Of A Procedural Fund, Xandra Kramer

Emory International Law Review

A new chapter started for collective actions with the 2020 Dutch Mass Damage Settlement in Collective Actions Act (WAMCA) and the E.U. Directive on representative actions for consumer cases. The expansion of the class action mechanism has not only raised procedural and practical questions but has also triggered debates on the funding of inherently expensive collective claims for damages. Absent appropriate public legal aid schemes, third-party litigation funding has been on the rise and commercial funding has become one of the most discussed and controversial topics in European civil justice. Developments in collective actions and funding have prompted the Dutch …

The Digitalization Of Litigation, Manuel A. Gómez

Emory International Law Review

The development of digital tools that enhance communications, security and decision making have caught the attention of international development agencies, national governments, civil society organizations, and the private sector. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has highlighted the importance of digital tools as a means “to improve justice sector efficiency, transparency and access to justice[,]” while the European Commission has aligned them with “a new push for European democracy in line with the political priority of a Europe fit for the digital age[.]” With these observations in mind, this article focuses on the unique advantages and challenges presented by the …

From Uniforms To Robes: Unveiling Judicial Review Practices Of The Supreme Court Of Israel In Cases Adjudicated In Military Tribunals, Yotam Berger

Emory International Law Review

While the Supreme Court of Israel has been, historically, perceived to be inclined to intervene in national security matters, this Article reveals a notable restraint in its review of criminal cases originating in military-operated tribunals. These tribunals include courts-martial (CMs), where soldiers are prosecuted, and occupied territory courts (OTCs), where Palestinians face charges. The study examines a database designed to encompass all available relevant cases decided by the Supreme Court of Israel from 2002 to 2021. It concludes that, despite its interventionist reputation, the Court exhibits a restricted, perhaps conservative stance toward criminal cases previously adjudicated by military judges. Notably, …

States, Firms, And Their Legal Fictions: Attributing Identity And Responsibility To Artificial Entities, Melissa (M.J.) Durkee

Scholarship@WashULaw

This volume offers a new point of entry into questions about how the law conceives of states and firms. Because states and firms are fictitious constructs rather than products of evolutionary biology, the law dictates which acts should be attributed to each entity, and by which actors. Those legal decisions construct firms and states by attributing identity and consequences to them. As the volume shows, these legal decisions are often products of path dependence or conceptual metaphors like “personhood” that have expanded beyond their original uses. Focusing on attribution, the volume considers an array of questions about artificial entities that …

Introduction To The Symposium On Digital Evidence, Melissa (M.J.) Durkee, Tamar Megiddo

Scholarship@WashULaw

The past few decades have seen radical advances in the availability and use of digital evidence in multiple areas of international law. Witnesses snap cellphone photos of unfolding atrocities and post them online, while others share updates in real time through messaging apps. Immigration officers search cell phones. Private citizens launch open-source online investigations. Investigators scrape social media posts. Digital experts verify authenticity with satellite geolocation. These new types of evidence and digitally facilitated methods and patterns of evidence gathering and analysis are revolutionizing the everyday practice of international law, drawing in an ever-wider circle of actors who can contribute …

Book Review: Rethinking Participation In Global Governance: Voice And Influence After Stakeholder Reforms In Global Finance And Health, Melissa (M.J.) Durkee

Scholarship@WashULaw

Who is entitled to contribute to rulemaking at the international or transnational levels? "Rethinking Participation in Global Governance takes an empirical tack," confronting the important and understudied—but methodologically confounding—question of how effectively to improve the representativeness of global governance. The volume’s carefully constructed qualitative studies offer a wealth of insights but few systematic or easily generalizable answers. Nevertheless, the book has much to offer, describing models and techniques to expand participation, offering examples of how various actors in the Global South were able to make use of them, then embedding this description in the push and pull of a scholarly …

Private Sector Participants In International Rulemaking: Governance Models, Melissa (M.J.) Durkee

Scholarship@WashULaw

International organizations seeking to develop a principled approach to stakeholder participation in rulemaking processes should consider for-profit stakeholders, which can be influential participants. This chapter evaluates potential governance models for their effectiveness in facilitating the benefits and restraining the harms of for-profit influence in rulemaking processes, recommending a balanced approach. A successful governance model should also acknowledge that for-profit stakeholders can use a variety of channels to communicate their input, including individual business entities, trade and industry associations, other non-governmental groups, academics and think tanks, and domestic officials. Because of these sometimes invisible links between for-profit actors and other kinds …

Key Un Committee Clears Path For Crimes Against Humanity Treaty Negotiations, Leila Nadya Sadat, Akila Radhakrishnan

Scholarship@WashULaw

On Friday, Nov. 22, 2024, the United Nations Sixth (Legal) Committee took a pivotal decision to advance toward negotiations on a global treaty regarding the prevention and punishment of crimes against humanity. The move is the latest in a series of discussions that has taken place over the past six years and brings States one step closer to finally closing the nearly 80-year-old gap in international law to comprehensively address these grave crimes.

We have been tracking this process together since 2021 in a Just Security series on the potential draft treaty, and in a recent article we chronicled the …

Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied: Moving Forward With A New Crimes Against Humanity Treaty, Leila Nadya Sadat, Akila Radhakrishnan

Scholarship@WashULaw

Eleven years after the International Law Commission (ILC) began considering the topic of crimes against humanity, and nearly 80 years after the London Charter was negotiated in the ashes of World War II, will States finally begin negotiating a new crimes against humanity treaty next year? The answer is not yet clear, although an overwhelming majority of the States expressing themselves last week said “yes.” This essay is a snapshot of the current state of play and is based on our firsthand observation of the plenary debate as well as discussions with State delegates and members of civil society. Negotiations …

A Draft Treaty On Crimes Against Humanity Draws More Engagement From States, Leila Nadya Sadat

Scholarship@WashULaw

The world’s first treaty on crimes against humanity inched closer to reality as the U.N. General Assembly’s Sixth (Legal) Committee recently wrapped up the last of a series of “resumed sessions” before States decide this October whether to proceed to formal negotiations on the document. Significantly more States and regional groups intervened during the most recent session, held last month, than in 2023, and the number that support the draft increased. Representatives of civil society also were present in much higher numbers, issuing a “Joint Statement in Support of Progress toward a Crimes Against Humanity Treaty” from more than 400 …

Fragmented Futures: Publication Choices And The Evolution Of International Legal Scholarship, Melissa (M.J.) Durkee

Scholarship@WashULaw

How we produce and disseminate international legal scholarship affects can affect how international law itself develops. Fragmentation and siloing of international legal scholarship can diminish the coherence of international law as a shared social practice across national borders. It can also diminish the perceived salience of international law within the United States, contributing to U.S. propensities toward exceptionalism and isolationism. Non-traditional publication formats have equalizing and connecting functions, but there is still room for growth when it comes to aggregating scholarship across regional, linguistic, and disciplinary divides. Finding ways to do that will help international lawyers better accomplish the field’s …

Belief In War, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Introductory Statement

Belief in war dominates our world. From Ukraine to Sudan to America’s ‘war on terror’, extraordinary resources are poured into militaries and arms races. The explanation for why belief in war has become prominent in foreign and security policy in Russia, the United States., China, NATO states and many other places is linked to the influence of Realist political theory. Pope St. John XXIII’s encyclical Pacem in Terris argued for honoring the alternatives to Realism – international law and institutions. It is time for an encyclical that responds directly to Realism and teaches belief in the authentic natural …

Rebalancing International Investment Law, Vera Korzun

Akron Law Faculty Publications

Several reform initiatives are currently ongoing seeking to cure international investment law from its inherent pro-investor bias. To achieve this goal, recent investment treaties contain enhanced provisions on the right to regulate and seek to increase investor compliance in such areas as environmental protection, sustainable development, and corporate social responsibility. Yet, how to reconcile the ongoing reform efforts at the international and regional levels seeking to create a new, rebalanced system of international investment law? How to achieve this proverbial system where interests of foreign investors are protected without encroaching on the rights of the host states? The answers to …

Xenophobia, The Global War On Terror, And Refugee Policy In The United States, Canada, And Western Europe, Chloe Lopez

UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations

Xenophobia has oscillated in intensity in the United States, Canada, and Western Europe since the late eighteenth century. This pattern of fear of immigrants and refugees being harbingers of violence and criminal activity establishes itself throughout the modern history of the United States, Canada, and Western Europe despite much evidence to the contrary. In the twentieth century, the prevailing argument surrounding the creation of xenophobia centered around economics. This divergence from twenty-first century patterns can be attributed to the Global War on Terror increasing alienation of refugees and immigrants through mythmaking and the structural securitization of immigration in the United …

Green Colonialism: Sidelined While On The Front Lines, M. Alexander Pearl

Faculty Articles

No abstract provided.

The Geoeconomics Of Belt And Road Disputes: A Case Study On The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, Mark Mclaughlin

Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law

This article argues that the dovetailing economic, geopolitical, and security interests that underpin the Belt and Road Initiative demands a dispute resolution mechanism that focuses on broader interests and legal rights. Using the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as a case study, it identifies the conditions in which Chinese investors could have initiated an investment arbitration but did not. This can be explained by the rights-based orientation of investment treaties failing to reflect the interests of multi-project initiatives. Instead, alternative methods of home state intervention, such as state-funded political risk insurance, are used to protect investors. In other words, the political …

Introduction To The Symposium On Rabiat Akande, "An Imperial History Of Race-Religion In International Law", S. James Anaya, Adrien K. Wing

Publications

No abstract provided.

Aggressor Status And Its Impact On International Criminal Law Case Selection, Nancy Amoury Combs

Faculty Publications

The laws of war apply equally to all parties to a conflict; thus, a party that violates international law by launching a war is granted the same international humanitarian law rights as a party that is required to defend against the illegal war. This doctrine—known as the equal application doctrine—has been sharply critiqued, particularly by philosophers, who claim the doctrine to be morally indefensible. Lawyers and legal academics, by contrast, defend the equal application doctrine because they reasonably fear that applying different rules to different warring parties will sharply reduce states’ willingness to comply with the international humanitarian law system …