International Law Commons^™

The End Of Legitimacy, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

IRAQ: ONE YEAR LATER

INTRODUCTORY REMARKS by Mary Ellen O'Connell, 261

THE USE OF FORCE IN IRAQ: ILLEGAL AND ILLEGITIMATE by Anne-Marie Slaughter, 262-63

THE IRAQ WAR AND THE FUTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW by Richard Falk, 263-66

THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE UN AFTER IRAQ by Thomas M Franck, 266-69

THE END OF LEGITIMACY by Mary Ellen O'Connell, 269-70

THE PROBLEMS OF LEGITIMACY-SPEAK by James Crawford, 271-73

Iraq: One Year Later, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Almost exactly one year ago, during her presidential speech at the 2003 Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law, Anne-Marie Slaughter spoke of the use of force that began in Iraq shortly before that Annual Meeting. She concluded that the war was unlawful but nevertheless potentially legitimate. That conclusion provoked a great debate from the moment her speech ended. Our purpose today is to take up that debate.

Universal Criminal Jurisdiction, Douglass Cassel

Journal Articles

Universal criminal jurisdiction is an important tool in the worldwide struggle to end impunity for serious international crimes.

Universal criminal jurisdiction is the principle of international law that permits any nation to prosecute certain serious international crimes, regardless of where they are committed, by whom or against whom, or any other unique tie to the prosecuting nation. The Recommendation applies whether or not an accused is in custody and does not address the separate topics of universal jurisdiction in civil cases or the immunities of senior government officials before foreign national courts.

Universal criminal jurisdiction developed over time as a …

Misusing International Sources To Interpret The Constituion, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

This article addresses the trend toward using international sources to interpret the Constitution. While recognizing that international sources may be appropriately used as persuasive authority in certain types of constitutional analysis, this article argues that such reliance is inappropriate if done improperly. There are four misuses of international sources that serve as the focus of the article.

The first misuse of international sources - particularly evident in death penalty litigation - occurs when the global opinions of humankind are ascribed constitutional value to thwart the domestic opinions of Americans. The article suggests that international norms cannot be internalized within our …

Unfunding Terror - Perspectives On Unfunding Terror (Panel One), Jimmy Gurulé

Journal Articles

According to the FBI, the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that claimed the lives of 2,973 innocent civilians required as much as $500,000 to stage. At the time, al Qaeda, the jihadi terrorist organization responsible for the mass killings, was operating on an annual budget between $30 and $50 million. However, despite the obvious fact that terrorists need money to support their terrorist operations and organizational infrastructure, prior to 9/11, preventing the financing of terrorism was not a priority for the United States or international community. Moreover, a comprehensive legal framework to …

Federal Courts, International Tribunals, And The Continuum Of Deference: A Postscript On Lawrence V. Texas, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Last year, in the pages of this journal, I published an article addressing the role of international tribunal decisions in federal courts.1 In that article, it was suggested that federal courts should confer varying degrees of deference to international tribunal decisions depending on the circumstances presented. Such degrees of deference were plotted along a "continuum of deference." See: Federal Courts, International Tribunals, and the Continuum of Deference

The purpose of this brief Postscript is to reconsider the "no deference" model in light of the Supreme Court's decisions in Bowers and Lawrence. The Postscript elucidates why Lawrence relied on an international …

International Legal Developments In Review: 2003 [Foreign Law Review], Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Introduction

Volume 38 Issues 2 (Summer) and 3 (Fall) are titled "International Legal Developments in Review: 2003." This Fall issue covers specific country laws. In previous volumes the Fall issue was titled "Foreign Law Year in Review..." and covered specific country laws.

International Legal Developments In Review: 2003, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Editor's Preface
• Introduction

Occupation Failures And The Legality Of Armed Conflict: The Case Of Iraqi Cultural Property, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

To wage war consistently with international law, a national leader must be able to answer at least three questions in the affirmative: Is there a right to resort to force? Is the use of force necessary? If it is necessary, can it be carried out in a way that the cost in terms of human lives, property, and damage to the natural environment will not outweigh the value of resorting to force? If the answer to any of these questions is no, the use of force is unlawful. International lawyers tend to focus on the first question, understandably. Why analyze …

Demos, Nomos And Globalization, Paolo G. Carozza

Book Chapters

It is a great privilege to comment on a paper that, like so much of Professor Weiler’s work, is brilliant not only in its intellectual scope but also in the underlying humanity of its vision. His basic thesis is indisputable. International law is indeed an exercise in governance that increasingly generates problems of legitimacy, especially because it governs without the ontological premises of democracy – it has no government and no demos. In the face of this problem, Weiler urges us to seek ‘alternative legitimating devices’. I would like to offer a modest comment on this thesis by making three …

Notre Dame Lawyer - Spring 2003, Notre Dame Law School

Notre Dame Lawyer

Reaching Beyond Borders
Encounter with Migrants
Reinforces Importance of Justice

Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law

Agent Orange Heads to the Supreme Court

A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis

Notre Dame Law School Faculty Focus: Professor Joseph Bauer

Friend-in-Law: Local Attorney Shares His Knowledge with Chilean Counterparts

Clynes Endowment Brings Chief Justice Rehnquist to Campus

Law School Announces Loan Repayment Assistance Program Established to Aid Those in Public Service

Law School Graduate Invested into the Sovereign Military Order of Malta

Introduction To The Symposium Issue On The Americanization Of International Dispute Resolution, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

With the end of the Cold War and the emergence of the United States as the world's only superpower, we have heard expressions of concern about the great weight of American influence in so many aspects of international life. One area of concern is America's influence on the law and processes of international dispute resolution (IDR). Of all the practice areas in IDR, practitioners and scholars of international arbitration have had the most detailed discussions on this theme to date. Their greatest worry is the growing tendency toward American litigation style in a process that is neither American nor litigation. …

Foreign Law Year In Review: 2002, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Introduction

La Doctrine Americaine Et L'Intervention En Iraq, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

In the days following the September 11 attacks on the United States, members of the Bush administration called for war against Iraq. When this call led to the development of an invasion plan, American legal scholars debated the legal arguments in favor of the war. By the time Operation Iraqi Freedom began on March 19, 2003, legal opinions fell into four categories:

- the invasion of Iraq is legal because there is no "viable" rule prohibiting the use of force;

- the invasion is legal because it was authorized by the Security Council and/or because it constitutes an exercise of …

Is There A New World Court?, Douglass Cassel

Journal Articles

I am pleased to introduce our conference on Human Rights and the Law of War: New Roles for the World Court? Why this conference? And why now? Our conference is prompted by two contrasting phenomena: The caseload of the ICJ seems to have been transformed in the post-Cold War period. The World Court is now busier than ever. It has more cases, increasingly involving questions of human rights or ongoing armed conflict. Yet these three inter-related phenomena—increased caseload, and more cases involving human rights or armed conflict—have been little analyzed or studied. Our purpose is to contribute to public and …

The American Influence On International Arbitration, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

It is indisputable that the international arbitration world is an identifiable epistemic community that transcends national borders, and whose members are shaped by their own experience. Increasingly, that experience reflects an American influence, be it heritage, training, affiliation, or client base. In these remarks, Professor Alford addresses three issues related to the Americanization of international arbitration. The first is whether international arbitration has, in fact, only recently become Americanized. He posits instead that there is always an ebb and flow to the level of the United States' involvement in international arbitration. During the drafting and signing of the 1958 New …

Subsidiarity As A Structural Principle Of International Human Rights Law, Paolo G. Carozza

Journal Articles

This article argues that the principle of subsidiarity should be recognized as a structural principle of international human rights law primarily because of the way that it mediates between the universalizing aspirations of human rights and the fact of the diversity of human communities in the world. The idea of subsidiarity is deeply consonant with the substantive vision of human dignity and the universal common good that is expressed through human rights norms. Yet, at the same time it promotes respect for pluralism by emphasizing the freedom of more local communities to realize their own ends for themselves.

Looking at …

Federal Courts, International Tribunals, And The Continuum Of Deference, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

The focus of the article is the degree of deference that federal courts should confer on the decisions of international tribunals. The Supreme Court has suggested that respectful consideration should be given to international tribunal decisions, but absent further guidance, federal courts have haphazardly addressed the question of what effect to give to their judgments. What is needed is a methodology for deference. For the first time in scholarly literature this article proposes such a methodology for all international tribunals based on seven models that have been applied to different international tribunals and should be applied to dozens of others. …

"My Friend Is A Stranger": The Death Penalty And The Global Ius Commune Of Human Rights, Paolo G. Carozza

Journal Articles

This article examines the judicial use of foreign jurisprudence in human rights adjudication, using as data a set of court decisions regarding the death penalty from over a dozen different tribunals in different parts of the world. The global human rights norms and judicial discourse on human rights in these cases can be understood and explained by comparing the contemporary practices to the medieval ius commune. The modern ius commune of human rights has three distinct characteristics which it shares with the historical example to which it is analogized: it is broadly transnational in scope and application; it is grounded …

Introductory Note To U.S. Court Of Appeals For The District Of Columbia Circuit: Nemariam, Et. Al. V. Ethiopia, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Nemariam v. Ethiopia is one of the most important United States decisions to date addressing whether an international tribunal may be an adequate forum for purposes of dismissing pending litigation based on forum non conveniens. The decision essentially suggests that diplomatic espousal claims before international tribunals can never afford claimants an adequate forum justifying dismissal based on forum non conveniens absent some guarantee of individual relief for meritorious claims.

International Legal Developments In Review: 2002, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

Contents

• Editor's Preface
• Introduction

Who Helps The Hegemon?, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Is the nature of the international legal system changing? Do we see developments in international relations that challenge the core concepts of international law, rendering the law dys-or non-functional. Professor Karl Zemanek sees indicators of just such change. He writes to arouse our attention to the dangers, urging us to act before it is too late. Professor Zemanek sees the United States tending toward hegemony or even imperialism and argues that these tendencies are already changing international law. I share his concerns for the ultimate health of international law, but urge a broader look at the dangers. Focus should be …

Re-Leashing The Dogs Of War, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Book review of International Law and the Use of Force. By Christine Gray. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Lawful Self-Defense To Terrorism, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

On October 7,2001, the United States and the United Kingdom launched operation Enduring Freedom. Enduring Freedom was a massive aerial and land operation on the territory of Afghanistan in response to the September 11 terror attacks on the United States. The two governments justified Enduring Freedom as an exercise of lawful self-defense. This article examines the elements of self-defense, applying them to Enduring Freedom. At the outset, Enduring Freedom did indeed meet the conditions of lawful self-defense, but later stages of the operation may have gone beyond the bounds of proportionality. The article also looks at the alternatives to self-defense …

Evidence Of Terror, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

In the hours after the 11 September attacks on the United States, some called for counterattacks on America's enemies, regardless of any evidence of wrong-doing. Those calls were rejected and some evidence was produced linking Osama bin Laden, his organization, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban regime of Afghanistan to the attacks. The United States and United Kingdom began a bombing campaign of Afghanistan on the strength of that evidence on 7 October 2001. This article explores the law of evidence in international law. It seeks to identify what evidence is sufficient for supporting a case of self-defence to clandestine terror attacks.

On War As Hell, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

This article addresses the question of the proper international standard for war reparations. War reparations are especially hard on the credibility and efficacy of international law. Wars are hard because the suffering is so great and reparations so onerous that often there is no mutuality of interest between the victorious governments and their own constituent victims. Wars force victorious States to make hard choices between looking backward to repair the harm caused to constituent victims and looking forward to a relationship with a potential strong and strategic ally. Just as the conduct of war, in its great features, is...policy itself, …

The Internationalization Of Legal Relations, Roger P. Alford

Journal Articles

What exactly does it mean to say that "legal relations" are becoming "internationalized"? For me, the concept is in large measure a vertical question: the degree to which international law is affecting (some might say encroaching on) traditional domestic law, particularly state law. This is particularly so with treaty law. In the United States at least, internationalization might be thought of as simply another arm of federalism, with Congress stipulating that certain sales of goods will be governed by international law, not the Uniform Commercial Code. Or that a certain category of child adoptions will be governed by federal treaty …

An Introduction: The Legalization Of International Relations/The Internationalization Of Legal Relations, Roger P. Alford, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

The Annual Meeting of the American Society of International Law is always an important gathering in the international legal community. It is a chance for everyone interested in international law to come together to deepen our understanding of the developments in the field. Ultimately, the aim of the discussion is to advance the international rule of law in the world.

To focus discussion at the 2002 Annual Meeting, we chose two intersecting developments that merited considered reflection: the legalization of international relations and the internationalization of legal relations. Representing two sides of the same coin, these twin themes, it was …

American Exceptionalism And The International Law Of Self-Defense, Mary Ellen O'Connell

Journal Articles

Following the September 11th attacks in the United States (U.S.), one could make a case for America's use of force in Afghanistan as a lawful exercise of the right of self-defense. But the proposals to invade Iraq following September 11th cannot be so defended. Those proposals did not concern defending the basic security of the U.S. in the sense that basic security defense is currently understood in the international community. They concerned, rather, defense of a more expansive concept of security, a concept wherein the U.S. need not tolerate antagonistic regimes with the potential to harm U.S. interests. The invasion …

International Remedies In National Criminal Cases: Icj Judgment In Germany V. United States, Douglass Cassel

Journal Articles

In Germany v. United States (2001), the International Court of Justice ruled that the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations confers judicially enforceable rights on foreign nationals detained for prolonged periods or sentenced to severe penalties without notice of their right to communicate with their consulates. The Court also ruled that states which fail to give timely notice cannot later invoke procedural default to bar individuals from judicial relief. However, the Court did not clearly address other issues, such as requiring individuals to show prejudice to the outcome of the trial, or denial of certain remedies for Convention violations, which may …