Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- International Law (83)
- Military, War, and Peace (52)
- National Security Law (39)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (27)
- International Humanitarian Law (24)
-
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (24)
- Terrorism Studies (24)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (22)
- Political Science (22)
- Criminal Law (21)
- International Relations (21)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- Constitutional Law (16)
- International and Area Studies (14)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (10)
- Jurisdiction (10)
- Courts (9)
- Criminal Procedure (8)
- Other Law (7)
- Immigration Law (6)
- Jurisprudence (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Near and Middle Eastern Studies (6)
- President/Executive Department (6)
- Law and Society (5)
- Rule of Law (5)
- Asian Studies (4)
- Fourteenth Amendment (4)
- Institution
-
- University of Denver (22)
- American University Washington College of Law (11)
- University of Michigan Law School (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Georgetown University Law Center (8)
-
- BLR (5)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Southern Methodist University (4)
- U.S. Naval War College (4)
- Notre Dame Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Duke Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Pace University (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of San Diego (2)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- American University in Cairo (1)
- Ateneo de Manila University (1)
- Brigham Young University (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Liberty University (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Human Rights & Human Welfare (22)
- Scholarly Works (10)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (8)
- ExpressO (5)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
-
- Articles (4)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- Human Rights Brief (4)
- International Law Studies (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Michigan Journal of International Law (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (3)
- Maryland Journal of International Law (2)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- Research Reports & White Papers (2)
- San Diego International Law Journal (2)
- Touro Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Appellate Briefs (1)
- Ateneo School of Government Publications (1)
- Brigham Young University Prelaw Review (1)
- Buffalo Human Rights Law Review (1)
- Cardozo Law News Archive (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Cornell Law School Inter-University Graduate Student Conference Papers (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 121 - 128 of 128
Full-Text Articles in Human Rights Law
The Modern Blood Feud: Thoughts On The Philosophy Of Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
The Modern Blood Feud: Thoughts On The Philosophy Of Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
Herman Melville brilliantly lets us feel, through Captain Ahab, the sensation of destructive rage, hatred and violence. Sadly, Melville's insight penetrates to the core of society, perhaps of each of us, in today's omnipresent terroristic melodrama. We have all suffered moments of vicarious terror and rage over the past few years as we watched news accounts of terrorist incidents, such as the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. The melodrama of terrorism has penetrated each of our lives. We see it and feel the rage nearly on a daily basis. Innocent children, women and men aboard Pan …
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Major Contemporary Issues In Extradition Law, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
In this piece Professor Blakesley provides remarks on high crimes in international law, and the ability to extradite state and high government officials for committing them.
Bearing Witness: The Art And Science Of Human Rights Fact-Finding, Diane Orentlicher
Bearing Witness: The Art And Science Of Human Rights Fact-Finding, Diane Orentlicher
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
No abstract provided.
Terrorism, Law, And Our Constitutional Order, Christopher L. Blakesley
Terrorism, Law, And Our Constitutional Order, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
We have all suffered moments of vicarious terror over the past few years as we watched news accounts of terrorist incidents, such as the downing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland. There, some institution, government, or group used innocent children, women, and men as fodder for their “war.” Some have claimed that the pusillanimous carnage was in retaliation for the slaughter of equivalent innocents aboard the Iranian Air Bus, similarly destroyed by American forces during the summer of 1988. Others suggested that it was committed by those interested in thwarting prospects of peace in the Middle East.
Jurisdiction As Legal Protection Against Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
Jurisdiction As Legal Protection Against Terrorism, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
On June 14, 1985, Robert Stethem was shot to death aboard a hijacked TWA airliner. On October 7, 1985, the Italian cruise-liner, Achille Lauro, was hijacked and the next day Leon Klinghofer was killed and thrown overboard. On Julyu 2, 1986, Rodrgio Rojas was mortally wounded when he was doused with gasoline and set afire while walking with protesters in Santiago, Chile. Soviets are said to leave booby-trapped dolls for Afghan Moujahadeen children. There is evidence that the United States government directly supports the Nicaraguan contras who, in waging their guerilla war, allegedly have killed innocent citizens. It is …
Panel Discussion, Professor Jonathan Charney, Professor Thomas Franck, Professor Jordan Paust, Professor John Murphy, Geoffrey Levitt, Professor Kenneth Abbott, Professor Robert Friedlander, Professor Alberto Coll, Professor Jerome Reichman
Panel Discussion, Professor Jonathan Charney, Professor Thomas Franck, Professor Jordan Paust, Professor John Murphy, Geoffrey Levitt, Professor Kenneth Abbott, Professor Robert Friedlander, Professor Alberto Coll, Professor Jerome Reichman
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
Kelsen, in his writings, took the position that in law, particularly international law, there are superior and inferior limits to the law; that is, when a norm is articulated and the society behaves in conformance with the norm, and it would do so even in the absence of the norm, the norm is not serving a legal function; it is not serving a normative function of encouraging behavior because the behavior would be in conformance with that norm in any event. There's also the inferior limit to the law; that is, a situation where a rule is articulated but the …
An Essay On Executive Branch Attempts To Eviscerate The Separation Of Powers, Christopher L. Blakesley
An Essay On Executive Branch Attempts To Eviscerate The Separation Of Powers, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
The Reagan Administration has been aggressively attempting to arrogate power to the Executive branch and to undermine the separation of powers in the realms of foreign affairs. To Chain the Dog of War shows that for decades the Executive branch has moved to appropriate Congress’ war powers. The Reagan Administration not only has continued that tradition, but also has attempted to erode the Judiciary’s power to decide questions of law and fact concerning human rights and liberty in international extradition cases involving political offenses. The underlying rationale for this shift has been that decisions to make war or to condemn …
The Evisceration Of The Political Offense Exception To Extradition, Christopher L. Blakesley
The Evisceration Of The Political Offense Exception To Extradition, Christopher L. Blakesley
Scholarly Works
The Supplementary Convention to the Extradition Treaty between the Government of the United States of American and the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, was signed on June 25, 1985, and transmitted to the U.S. Senate on July 17, 1985. This article will focus on the portion of the supplementary treaty which effectively eliminates the political offense exception, and on the statement made by the Legal Adviser to the Department of State, the honorable Judge Abraham D. Sofaer, made in favor of the Supplementary Treaty, on August 1, 1985. This article suggests that approval of …