Human Rights Law Commons^™

Klausula Most-Favoured Nation Di Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Internasional, Sulaiman Nitiatma, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Upaya-Upaya Hukum Yang Dapat Digunakan Oleh Pencari Keadilan Menurut Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia, Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kemenangan Republik Indonesia Dan Negara-Negara Opec Dalam Perkara Bandingan Di Amerika Serikat (Suatu Keputusan Penting Untuk Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Internasional), Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Adopsi (Pengangkatan Anak) Di Pengadilan Negeri Belum Ada Unifikasi Hukumnya, H.P. Panggabean S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kasus Rajiyem Di Muka Pengadilan Negeri Bantul, Wahyu Afand, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pangkat Dan Kedudukan Hakim Sipil Dalam Persidangan Koneksitas, Bismar Siregar, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Penggunaan Dasar-Dasar Analisa Kausal Dalam Penelitian Sosiologi Hukum Yang Non Doktriner, Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Masalah Bunga Dan Perubahan Nilai Mata Uang, Ridwan Syahrani, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

The White-Colar Crime Sebuah Konsepsi Sosio-Kriminologi, I. Nyoman Nurjaya, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perjanjian Internasional Tak Tertulis Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Internasional, Wayan Parthiana, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pma Dan Uupma Harapan Dan Kenyataan (Sebuah Telaah Mengenai Kebijaksanaan Penanaman Modal), T. Mulya Lubis, S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Arbitrase International Mengenai Perselisihan Penanaman Modal, Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Desperate Crossings, Unjust Seas: Challenging The Interdiction And Forcible Return Of Asylum Seekers On The High Seas, Katarina Herring-Trott

Fordham Law Review Online

In the past two years, irregular maritime migration has reached levels not seen in decades. International human rights law requires that states screen migrants’ asylum claims and prohibits states from returning migrants to a place where they face persecution. However, due to recent trends in refugee securitization, states attempt to dodge their international obligations by going to the high seas and forcibly returning migrant vessels. States are not held accountable for these forced returns, owing to gray areas in overlapping provisions of maritime and human rights law. This Essay analyzes ambiguous maritime law provisions, interpreting them in accordance with relevant …

Hukum Perhubungan Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Kerjasama Asean, Dr. Sunaryati Hartono, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pembajakan Udara Dan Extradisi Pembajak, K. Martono S.H., Ll.M.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemakai Angkutan Dalam Hukum Perhubungan Indonesia, E. Suherman S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pengertian Keuangan Negara, A. Hamid S. Attamimi, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Pengoperasian Kapal Di Perairan Indonesia, Tamalia Alisyahbana

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Mengenal Perjanjian Multifiber : Praktek Di Negara-Negara Mee, Sook Young Yeu, Felik Oentoeng Soebagjo

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Obligasi Salah Satu Pilihan Untuk Ber-Investasi, M. Irsan Nasaruddin

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Tindakan-Tindakan Republik Indonesia Diuji Oleh Badan-Badan Peradilan Luar Negeri, Prof. Dr. Mr. Sudargo Gautama

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Reason Enough: The Wrongful Extension Of Asylum’S “One Central Reason” Nexus Standard To Withholding Of Removal, Elaine Hernandez Flores

Washington Law Review

Noncitizens often come to the United States seeking protection from violence, persecution, or life-threatening conditions in their home countries. However, upon arrival, many noncitizens are placed in removal proceedings and face deportation back to the very dangers they escaped. U.S. immigration law provides various forms of relief from deportation, most notably asylum and withholding of removal. Both forms require the applicant to show a connection—or “nexus”—between the persecutor’s motive for persecuting them and one of five protected grounds: race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.

Although asylum and withholding of removal both require a noncitizen …

Comparative Judicial Enforcement, Rosa Hayes, Angela Hefti

Washington Law Review

Almost immediately upon his second inauguration, President Trump took several actions that subvert longstanding norms, contravene long-settled Supreme Court precedent, and disrespect the authority of the coordinate branches to check executive branch excess. The Administration’s actions pose both immediate and long-term challenges to the American constitutional order, with many scholars and citizens believing that the United States is in the midst of a constitutional crisis. At minimum, the Trump Administration’s actions have illuminated sticking points in both functionalist and formalist conceptions of the separation of powers. For this model of shared but distributed power to function, each branch must give …

Our Eviction Court Clients Need This Treaty: The U.S. Must Finally Ratify The International Covenant On Economic, Social, And Cultural Rights, Fran Quigley

Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review

Anyone enduring poverty in the U.S. or working with persons enduring poverty–as we do in our law school eviction clinic–is aware that housing, healthcare, food, and sufficient income are essential to human survival and dignity. Yet those basic necessities are not rights guaranteed under U.S. law. Instead, discretionary, underfunded efforts to address economic needs have led to widespread U.S. poverty and a toxic one-step-forward/one-step-backward policy dance, characterized by safety net programs expanding only to be cut when political winds shift.

The U.S. should join nearly every other nation in the world by ratifying the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and …

Keynote: Going Forward After Grants Pass, Joseph W. Mead

William & Mary Law Review

In this keynote, I explain the decision—and the stakes—of City of Grants Pass v. Johnson. In Grants Pass, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment’s Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause posed no barrier to cities making it a crime for their homeless residents to sleep outdoors with as little as a blanket, even when those residents have no other option. Grants Pass, Oregon undertook an aggressive campaign to drive unhoused residents out of the city through punitive ordinances that criminalized unavoidable human conduct, such as sleeping with a blanket. The plaintiffs challenged the narrowest version of these …

Perkembangan Dan Ruang Lingkup Sosiologi Hukum, Mulyana W. Kusumah

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Masalah Voting Dalam Praktek Demokrasi Pancasila, Razali Abdullah, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Asas Patut Sebagai Asas Kerja Penyelesaian Perkara Menurut Hukum Adat Bali, Atmadja S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Kriminalistik, Pengungkap Materiele Waardheid, I Nyoman Nurjaya, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract

Strategi Pencegahan Kejahatan Dan Pembangunan Nasional, Prof. Abdul Karim Nasution, S.H.

Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan

Abstract